Remove the if condition check and else code section in
query_rx_phy_status(). As variable cck_highpwr is assign a value of '0'
after this assignment, if condition check !cck_highpwr is always
going to be true. So remove the if condition check as well as else
section which will be never true.
After removing the if condition there is no use of local variable
cck_highpwr. Remove the local variable cck_highpwr.
Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_recv.c | 75 +++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_recv.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_recv.c
index 0ffb30f1af7e..f04c454e16a6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_recv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_recv.c
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ static void query_rx_phy_status(struct _adapter *padapter,
s8 rx_pwr[4], rx_pwr_all;
u8 pwdb_all;
u32 rssi, total_rssi = 0;
- u8 bcck_rate = 0, rf_rx_num = 0, cck_highpwr = 0;
+ u8 bcck_rate = 0, rf_rx_num = 0;
struct phy_cck_rx_status *pcck_buf;
u8 sq;
@@ -723,55 +723,32 @@ static void query_rx_phy_status(struct _adapter *padapter,
* (2)PWDB, Average PWDB calculated by hardware
* (for rate adaptive)
*/
- if (!cck_highpwr) {
- report = pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt & 0xc0;
- report >>= 6;
- switch (report) {
- /* Modify the RF RNA gain value to -40, -20,
- * -2, 14 by Jenyu's suggestion
- * Note: different RF with the different
- * RNA gain.
- */
- case 0x3:
- rx_pwr_all = -40 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
- 0x3e);
- break;
- case 0x2:
- rx_pwr_all = -20 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
- 0x3e);
- break;
- case 0x1:
- rx_pwr_all = -2 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
- 0x3e);
- break;
- case 0x0:
- rx_pwr_all = 14 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
- 0x3e);
- break;
- }
- } else {
- report = ((u8)(le32_to_cpu(pphy_stat->phydw1) >> 8)) &
- 0x60;
- report >>= 5;
- switch (report) {
- case 0x3:
- rx_pwr_all = -40 - ((pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
- 0x1f) << 1);
- break;
- case 0x2:
- rx_pwr_all = -20 - ((pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
- 0x1f) << 1);
- break;
- case 0x1:
- rx_pwr_all = -2 - ((pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
- 0x1f) << 1);
- break;
- case 0x0:
- rx_pwr_all = 14 - ((pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
- 0x1f) << 1);
- break;
- }
+ report = pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt & 0xc0;
+ report >>= 6;
+ switch (report) {
+ /* Modify the RF RNA gain value to -40, -20,
+ * -2, 14 by Jenyu's suggestion
+ * Note: different RF with the different
+ * RNA gain.
+ */
+ case 0x3:
+ rx_pwr_all = -40 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
+ 0x3e);
+ break;
+ case 0x2:
+ rx_pwr_all = -20 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
+ 0x3e);
+ break;
+ case 0x1:
+ rx_pwr_all = -2 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
+ 0x3e);
+ break;
+ case 0x0:
+ rx_pwr_all = 14 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
+ 0x3e);
+ break;
}
+
pwdb_all = query_rx_pwr_percentage(rx_pwr_all);
/* CCK gain is smaller than OFDM/MCS gain,*/
/* so we add gain diff by experiences, the val is 6 */
--
2.33.0
On 10/28/21 07:31, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> Remove the if condition check and else code section in
> query_rx_phy_status(). As variable cck_highpwr is assign a value of '0'
> after this assignment, if condition check !cck_highpwr is always
> going to be true. So remove the if condition check as well as else
> section which will be never true.
>
> After removing the if condition there is no use of local variable
> cck_highpwr. Remove the local variable cck_highpwr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <[email protected]>
> ---
[code snip]
> + report = pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt & 0xc0;
> + report >>= 6;
> + switch (report) {
> + /* Modify the RF RNA gain value to -40, -20,
> + * -2, 14 by Jenyu's suggestion
> + * Note: different RF with the different
> + * RNA gain.
> + */
> + case 0x3:
> + rx_pwr_all = -40 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
> + 0x3e);
You can move "0x3e);" part on previous line, since it will fit even 80
characters boundary. It will improve readability, IMO
Same below.
> + break;
> + case 0x2:
> + rx_pwr_all = -20 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
> + 0x3e);
> + break;
> + case 0x1:
> + rx_pwr_all = -2 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
> + 0x3e);
> + break;
> + case 0x0:
> + rx_pwr_all = 14 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
> + 0x3e);
> + break;
> }
> +
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
On 28/10/21 4:56 pm, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> On 10/28/21 07:31, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
>> Remove the if condition check and else code section in
>> query_rx_phy_status(). As variable cck_highpwr is assign a value of '0'
>> after this assignment, if condition check !cck_highpwr is always
>> going to be true. So remove the if condition check as well as else
>> section which will be never true.
>>
>> After removing the if condition there is no use of local variable
>> cck_highpwr. Remove the local variable cck_highpwr.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> [code snip]
>
>> + report = pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt & 0xc0;
>> + report >>= 6;
>> + switch (report) {
>> + /* Modify the RF RNA gain value to -40, -20,
>> + * -2, 14 by Jenyu's suggestion
>> + * Note: different RF with the different
>> + * RNA gain.
>> + */
>> + case 0x3:
>> + rx_pwr_all = -40 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
>> + 0x3e);
>
> You can move "0x3e);" part on previous line, since it will fit even 80 characters boundary. It will improve readability, IMO
>
> Same below.
>
Yes, This is also can be done on same patch.
Thanks for review Pavel
>> + break;
>> + case 0x2:
>> + rx_pwr_all = -20 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
>> + 0x3e);
>> + break;
>> + case 0x1:
>> + rx_pwr_all = -2 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
>> + 0x3e);
>> + break;
>> + case 0x0:
>> + rx_pwr_all = 14 - (pcck_buf->cck_agc_rpt &
>> + 0x3e);
>> + break;
>> }
>> +
>
>
>
> With regards,
> Pavel Skripkin
Regards,
Saurav