Removed uneccessary parentheses from source file
Signed-off-by: Brandon Crain <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c
index 215fca4abb3a..2bf4661432a9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void r8712_recv_indicatepkt(struct _adapter *adapter,
skb->data = recvframe->u.hdr.rx_data;
skb->len = recvframe->u.hdr.len;
skb_set_tail_pointer(skb, skb->len);
- if ((attrib->tcpchk_valid == 1) && (attrib->tcp_chkrpt == 1))
+ if (attrib->tcpchk_valid == 1 && attrib->tcp_chkrpt == 1)
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
else
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
--
2.34.1
On 3/22/24 16:11, Brandon Crain wrote:
Please make your "Subject" line more unique. Consider that we may end up
with having dozen of commits like yours, all of them referring to
different removals and all without the necessary information to tell
what they differ in (except the driver/subsystem). So it would help if
you add the changed file or function to make it more unique.
> Removed uneccessary parentheses from source file
Please use a full sentences with final dot. Always consider that the why
is most important to answer. In your case the answer would be "because
it is unnecessary" My preferred proposal would be:
Remove unnecessary parentheses to increase readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brandon Crain <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c
> index 215fca4abb3a..2bf4661432a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void r8712_recv_indicatepkt(struct _adapter *adapter,
> skb->data = recvframe->u.hdr.rx_data;
> skb->len = recvframe->u.hdr.len;
> skb_set_tail_pointer(skb, skb->len);
> - if ((attrib->tcpchk_valid == 1) && (attrib->tcp_chkrpt == 1))
> + if (attrib->tcpchk_valid == 1 && attrib->tcp_chkrpt == 1)
I am not so happy with this proposal I need to know the exact rules that
the == has priority over &&. So I like to read it with brackets.
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> else
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
If you send in a second version of this patch please use a change
history. Description from Dan under:
https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/07/27/how-to-send-a-v2-patch/
Thanks for your support.
Bye Philipp
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 09:11:52AM -0600, Brandon Crain wrote:
> Removed uneccessary parentheses from source file
>
> Signed-off-by: Brandon Crain <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c
> index 215fca4abb3a..2bf4661432a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/recv_linux.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void r8712_recv_indicatepkt(struct _adapter *adapter,
> skb->data = recvframe->u.hdr.rx_data;
> skb->len = recvframe->u.hdr.len;
> skb_set_tail_pointer(skb, skb->len);
> - if ((attrib->tcpchk_valid == 1) && (attrib->tcp_chkrpt == 1))
> + if (attrib->tcpchk_valid == 1 && attrib->tcp_chkrpt == 1)
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> else
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- You sent a patch that has been sent multiple times in the past and is
identical to ones that has been recently rejected. Please always look
at the mailing list traffic to determine if you are duplicating other
people's work.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot