Use the new ports list instead of iterating over switches and their
ports to find a port from a given node.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <[email protected]>
---
net/dsa/dsa2.c | 17 +++--------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index 84afeaeef141..8b038cc56769 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -113,22 +113,11 @@ static bool dsa_port_is_user(struct dsa_port *dp)
static struct dsa_port *dsa_tree_find_port_by_node(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
struct device_node *dn)
{
- struct dsa_switch *ds;
struct dsa_port *dp;
- int device, port;
-
- for (device = 0; device < DSA_MAX_SWITCHES; device++) {
- ds = dst->ds[device];
- if (!ds)
- continue;
- for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
- dp = &ds->ports[port];
-
- if (dp->dn == dn)
- return dp;
- }
- }
+ list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
+ if (dp->dn == dn)
+ return dp;
return NULL;
}
--
2.23.0
On 10/19/2019 8:19 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Use the new ports list instead of iterating over switches and their
> ports to find a port from a given node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian