2023-02-02 02:18:59

by Zev Weiss

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] hwmon: (peci/cputemp) Fix off-by-one in coretemp_label allocation

The find_last_bit() call produces the index of the highest-numbered
core in core_mask; because cores are numbered from zero, the number of
elements we need to allocate is one more than that.

Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] # v5.18
Fixes: bf3608f338e9 ("hwmon: peci: Add cputemp driver")
---
drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c
index ec9851daf2e8..f13cc4170f58 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int create_temp_label(struct peci_cputemp *priv)
unsigned long core_max = find_last_bit(priv->core_mask, CORE_NUMS_MAX);
int i;

- priv->coretemp_label = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, core_max * sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ priv->coretemp_label = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, (core_max + 1) * sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv->coretemp_label)
return -ENOMEM;

--
2.39.1.236.ga8a28b9eace8



2023-02-03 00:02:40

by Winiarska, Iwona

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (peci/cputemp) Fix off-by-one in coretemp_label allocation

On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 18:18 -0800, Zev Weiss wrote:
> The find_last_bit() call produces the index of the highest-numbered
> core in core_mask; because cores are numbered from zero, the number of
> elements we need to allocate is one more than that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] # v5.18
> Fixes: bf3608f338e9 ("hwmon: peci: Add cputemp driver")

Thanks for catching it.

Reviewed-by: Iwona Winiarska <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c
> index ec9851daf2e8..f13cc4170f58 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int create_temp_label(struct peci_cputemp *priv)
>         unsigned long core_max = find_last_bit(priv->core_mask,
> CORE_NUMS_MAX);
>         int i;
>  
> -       priv->coretemp_label = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, core_max * sizeof(char
> *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       priv->coretemp_label = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, (core_max + 1) *
> sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!priv->coretemp_label)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>  

2023-02-03 15:28:06

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (peci/cputemp) Fix off-by-one in coretemp_label allocation

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 06:18:25PM -0800, Zev Weiss wrote:
> The find_last_bit() call produces the index of the highest-numbered
> core in core_mask; because cores are numbered from zero, the number of
> elements we need to allocate is one more than that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] # v5.18
> Fixes: bf3608f338e9 ("hwmon: peci: Add cputemp driver")
> Reviewed-by: Iwona Winiarska <[email protected]>

Applied.

Thanks,
Guenter

> ---
> drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c
> index ec9851daf2e8..f13cc4170f58 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int create_temp_label(struct peci_cputemp *priv)
> unsigned long core_max = find_last_bit(priv->core_mask, CORE_NUMS_MAX);
> int i;
>
> - priv->coretemp_label = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, core_max * sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + priv->coretemp_label = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, (core_max + 1) * sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!priv->coretemp_label)
> return -ENOMEM;
>