Hi,
On 2023/8/25 21:18, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> [Public]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: amd-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Sui
>> Jingfeng
>> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 2:27 AM
>> To: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]; Sui Jingfeng <[email protected]>;
>> [email protected]; [email protected]; dri-
>> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Add the pci_get_base_class() helper and use it
>>
>> From: Sui Jingfeng <[email protected]>
>>
>> There is no function that can be used to get all PCI(e) devices in a system by
>> matching against its the PCI base class code only, while keep the sub-class code
>> and the programming interface ignored. Therefore, add the
>> pci_get_base_class() function to suit the need.
>>
>> For example, if an application want to process all PCI(e) display devices in a
>> system, it can achieve such goal by writing the code as following:
>>
>> pdev = NULL;
>> do {
>> pdev = pci_get_base_class(PCI_BASE_CLASS_DISPLAY, pdev);
>> if (!pdev)
>> break;
>>
>> do_something_for_pci_display_device(pdev);
>> } while (1);
>>
>> Sui Jingfeng (5):
>> PCI: Add the pci_get_base_class() helper
>> ALSA: hda/intel: Use pci_get_base_class() to reduce duplicated code
>> drm/nouveau: Use pci_get_base_class() to reduce duplicated code
>> drm/amdgpu: Use pci_get_base_class() to reduce duplicated code
>> drm/radeon: Use pci_get_base_class() to reduce duplicated code
>>
> Series is:
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Thanks a lot.
What to do next then?
By the way, Bjorn, what's your opinion?
I'm ask because I don't know what to do next with this series.
As they belong to different system of Linux kernel,
the rest of patch (0002 ~ 0005) depend on the first one.
I think, merge the 0001-patch firstly, then wait it arrive at drm-misc, alsa branch.
Or, to do something else?