2024-04-02 02:15:35

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support

This patchset is a rework from Oleksii's RFC v5 patchset
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

This patchset introduces some changes based on RFC v5:
- introduce helper get_max_msg_size
- support compatible string
- iterate the id_table
- Support multiple configs in one command
- Added i.MX support
- Patch 5 firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support
is almost same as RFCv5 expect multiple configs support.
- Patch 4 the dt-bindings includes compatible string to support i.MX
- Rebased on 2023-12-15 linux-next/master

If any comments from RFC v5 are missed, I am sorry in advance.

This PINCTRL Protocol is following Version 3.2 SCMI Spec Beta release.

On ARM-based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control Processor
(SCP) provides control on pins, as well as with power, clocks, reset
controllers. So implement the driver to support such cases.

The i.MX95 Example as below:

Configuration:
The scmi-pinctrl driver can be configured using DT bindings.
For example:
/ {
sram0: sram@445b1000 {
compatible = "mmio-sram";
reg = <0x0 0x445b1000 0x0 0x400>;

#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x445b1000 0x400>;

scmi_buf0: scmi-sram-section@0 {
compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
reg = <0x0 0x80>;
};

scmi_buf1: scmi-sram-section@80 {
compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
reg = <0x80 0x80>;
};
};

firmware {
scmi {
compatible = "arm,scmi";
mboxes = <&mu2 5 0>, <&mu2 3 0>, <&mu2 3 1>;
shmem = <&scmi_buf0>, <&scmi_buf1>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;

scmi_iomuxc: protocol@19 {
compatible = "fsl,imx95-scmi-pinctrl";
reg = <0x19>;
};
};
};
};

&scmi_iomuxc {
pinctrl_tpm3: tpm3grp {
fsl,pins = <
IMX95_PAD_GPIO_IO12__TPM3_CH2(0x51e)
>;
};
};

This patchset has been tested on i.MX95-19x19-EVK board.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v7:
- Hope I not miss any comments. If any missed, please forgive. Since
i.MX95 SCMI firmware not support all the pinctrl features, I could only
do limited test.
- Version set to 0x10000
- Drop scmi_msg_func_set
- Use get_all to replace flag[0,1], not support flag 2 as of now.
- Add settings_get_one and settings_get_all ops to support get_all[false, true]
- PINCTRL_SET_PERMISSIONS is not included in this patchset
- Bail out if nr_pins is 0
- Add check nr_functions and nr_groups if they are 0.
- ext_name_flag changed to bool type
- Drop unrelated comment
- Use a central function for pin request and free
- Coding style optimization
- Use pinfunction to replace scmi_pinctrl_funcs
- For the devm_x APIs comments from Andy, I not update in the x/arm_scmi/pinctrl.c,
because it is correct usage.
- For included headers, I keep not change. I try to follow 80 max chars
for scmi driver, but with a few lines still exceed.
- Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v6:
- Update pinctrl driver following ARM SCMI 3.2 public release
- Addressed Dan's comments, and followed Dan's suggestions, thanks.
- Dropped R-b/T-b in patch 3/4 and patch 4/4,
- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v5:
- Rebased to linux-next next-20240313
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v4:
- Rebased to next-20240222
- Drop pinctrl-scmi-imx and compatible patches in V3
- Add T-b and R-b collected from v3
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v3:
- Add R-b for dt-binding patch
- Use 80 chars per line to align with other scmi drivers
- Add pinctrl_scmi_alloc_configs pinctrl_scmi_free_configs to replace
driver global config_value and config_type array to avoid in parrell
access issue. When num_configs is larger than 4, use alloc, else use
stack.
- Drop the separate MAITAINERS entry for firmware scmi pinctrl
- Use enum type, not u8 when referring the scmi or generic pin conf type
- Drop scmi_pinctrl_config_get_all which is not used at all for now.
- Update copyright year to 2024
- Move the enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type above pinctrl_proto_ops for consistency
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v2:
Added comments, and added R-b for Patch 1
Moved the compatile string and i.MX patch to the end, marked NOT APPLY
Patchset based on lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Addressed the binding doc issue, dropped i.MX content.
For the firmware pinctrl scmi driver, addressed the comments from Cristian
For the pinctrl scmi driver, addressed comments from Cristian

For the i.MX95 OEM stuff, I not have good idea, expect using compatbile
string. Maybe the firmware public an protocol attribute to indicate it is
VENDOR stuff or NXP use a new protocol id, not 0x19. But I think
current pinctrl-scmi.c not able to support OEM config, should we extend
it with some method? Anyway if patch 1-4 is good enough, they could
be picked up first.

Since I am only able to test the patch on i.MX95 which not support
geneirc pinconf, only OEM configs are tested in my side.

---
Peng Fan (4):
firmware: arm_scmi: introduce helper get_max_msg_size
dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support pinctrl protocol
firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support
pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver

.../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 50 ++
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 3 +-
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 17 +
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/pinctrl.c | 897 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h | 3 +
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c | 560 +++++++++++++
include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 83 ++
10 files changed, 1625 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
base-commit: 70ca90deeca172d343bd18bf7fb2f992214c23c0
change-id: 20231215-pinctrl-scmi-4c5b0374f4c6

Best regards,
--
Peng Fan <[email protected]>



2024-04-02 02:15:36

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 4/4] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

scmi-pinctrl driver implements pinctrl driver interface and using
SCMI protocol to redirect messages from pinctrl subsystem SDK to
SCMI platform firmware, which does the changes in HW.

Co-developed-by: Oleksii Moisieiev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oleksii Moisieiev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c | 560 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 573 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4b511a55101c..d8270ac6651a 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -21457,6 +21457,7 @@ F: drivers/cpufreq/sc[mp]i-cpufreq.c
F: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/
F: drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
F: drivers/hwmon/scmi-hwmon.c
+F: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c
F: drivers/pmdomain/arm/
F: drivers/powercap/arm_scmi_powercap.c
F: drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
index d45657aa986a..4e6f65cf0e76 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
@@ -450,6 +450,17 @@ config PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP
help
This support pinctrl and GPIO driver for Rockchip SoCs.

+config PINCTRL_SCMI
+ tristate "Pinctrl driver using SCMI protocol interface"
+ depends on ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL || COMPILE_TEST
+ select PINMUX
+ select GENERIC_PINCONF
+ help
+ This driver provides support for pinctrl which is controlled
+ by firmware that implements the SCMI interface.
+ It uses SCMI Message Protocol to interact with the
+ firmware providing all the pinctrl controls.
+
config PINCTRL_SINGLE
tristate "One-register-per-pin type device tree based pinctrl driver"
depends on OF
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
index 2152539b53d5..cc809669405a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_PIC32) += pinctrl-pic32.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_PISTACHIO) += pinctrl-pistachio.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_RK805) += pinctrl-rk805.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP) += pinctrl-rockchip.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SCMI) += pinctrl-scmi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE) += pinctrl-single.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ST) += pinctrl-st.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_STMFX) += pinctrl-stmfx.o
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..827d9ef8a209
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-scmi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,560 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * System Control and Power Interface (SCMI) Protocol based pinctrl driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 EPAM
+ * Copyright 2024 NXP
+ */
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
+
+#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
+#include "core.h"
+#include "pinconf.h"
+
+#define DRV_NAME "scmi-pinctrl"
+
+/* Define num configs, if not large than 4 use stack, else use kcalloc */
+#define SCMI_NUM_CONFIGS 4
+
+static const struct scmi_pinctrl_proto_ops *pinctrl_ops;
+
+struct scmi_pinctrl {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph;
+ struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev;
+ struct pinctrl_desc pctl_desc;
+ struct pinfunction *functions;
+ unsigned int nr_functions;
+ struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
+ unsigned int nr_pins;
+};
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+
+ return pinctrl_ops->count_get(pmx->ph, GROUP_TYPE);
+}
+
+static const char *pinctrl_scmi_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector)
+{
+ int ret;
+ const char *name;
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+
+ ret = pinctrl_ops->name_get(pmx->ph, selector, GROUP_TYPE, &name);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pmx->dev, "get name failed with err %d", ret);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return name;
+}
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector,
+ const unsigned int **pins,
+ unsigned int *num_pins)
+{
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+
+ return pinctrl_ops->group_pins_get(pmx->ph, selector, pins, num_pins);
+}
+
+static const struct pinctrl_ops pinctrl_scmi_pinctrl_ops = {
+ .get_groups_count = pinctrl_scmi_get_groups_count,
+ .get_group_name = pinctrl_scmi_get_group_name,
+ .get_group_pins = pinctrl_scmi_get_group_pins,
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_all,
+ .dt_free_map = pinconf_generic_dt_free_map,
+#endif
+};
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_get_functions_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+
+ return pinctrl_ops->count_get(pmx->ph, FUNCTION_TYPE);
+}
+
+static const char *pinctrl_scmi_get_function_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector)
+{
+ int ret;
+ const char *name;
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+
+ ret = pinctrl_ops->name_get(pmx->ph, selector, FUNCTION_TYPE, &name);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pmx->dev, "get name failed with err %d", ret);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return name;
+}
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector,
+ const char * const **p_groups,
+ unsigned int * const p_num_groups)
+{
+ struct pinfunction *func;
+ const unsigned int *group_ids;
+ unsigned int num_groups;
+ const char **groups;
+ int ret, i;
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+
+ if (!p_groups || !p_num_groups)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (selector >= pmx->nr_functions)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ func = &pmx->functions[selector];
+ if (func->ngroups)
+ goto done;
+
+ ret = pinctrl_ops->function_groups_get(pmx->ph, selector, &num_groups,
+ &group_ids);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pmx->dev, "Unable to get function groups, err %d", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ if (!num_groups)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ groups = kcalloc(num_groups, sizeof(*groups), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!groups)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_groups; i++) {
+ groups[i] = pinctrl_scmi_get_group_name(pctldev, group_ids[i]);
+ if (!groups[i]) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_free;
+ }
+ }
+
+ func->ngroups = num_groups;
+ func->groups = groups;
+done:
+ *p_groups = (const char * const *)func->groups;
+ *p_num_groups = func->ngroups;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_free:
+ kfree(groups);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_func_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector, unsigned int group)
+{
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+
+ return pinctrl_ops->mux_set(pmx->ph, selector, group);
+}
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+
+ return pinctrl_ops->pin_request(pmx->ph, offset);
+}
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_free(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+
+ return pinctrl_ops->pin_free(pmx->ph, offset);
+}
+
+static const struct pinmux_ops pinctrl_scmi_pinmux_ops = {
+ .request = pinctrl_scmi_request,
+ .free = pinctrl_scmi_free,
+ .get_functions_count = pinctrl_scmi_get_functions_count,
+ .get_function_name = pinctrl_scmi_get_function_name,
+ .get_function_groups = pinctrl_scmi_get_function_groups,
+ .set_mux = pinctrl_scmi_func_set_mux,
+};
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_map_pinconf_type(enum pin_config_param param,
+ enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type *type)
+{
+ u32 arg = param;
+
+ switch (arg) {
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_BUS_HOLD:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_BIAS_BUS_HOLD;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_BIAS_DISABLE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_BIAS_PULL_DOWN;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_BIAS_PULL_DEFAULT;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_BIAS_PULL_UP;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_SOURCE:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_DRIVE_OPEN_SOURCE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_DRIVE_STRENGTH;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH_UA:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_DRIVE_STRENGTH;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_DEBOUNCE:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_INPUT_DEBOUNCE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_INPUT_MODE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_INPUT_SCHMITT;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_INPUT_MODE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_MODE_LOW_POWER:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_LOW_POWER_MODE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_OUTPUT_VALUE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_ENABLE:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_OUTPUT_MODE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_OHMS:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_OUTPUT_VALUE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_POWER_SOURCE:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_POWER_SOURCE;
+ break;
+ case PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE:
+ *type = SCMI_PIN_SLEW_RATE;
+ break;
+ case SCMI_PIN_OEM_START ... SCMI_PIN_OEM_END:
+ *type = arg;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int _pin, unsigned long *config)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ enum pin_config_param config_type;
+ enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type type;
+ u32 config_value;
+
+ if (!config)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ config_type = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
+
+ ret = pinctrl_scmi_map_pinconf_type(config_type, &type);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = pinctrl_ops->settings_get_one(pmx->ph, _pin, PIN_TYPE, type,
+ &config_value);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ *config = pinconf_to_config_packed(config_type, config_value);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+pinctrl_scmi_alloc_configs(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, u32 num_configs,
+ u32 **p_config_value,
+ enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type **p_config_type)
+{
+ if (num_configs <= SCMI_NUM_CONFIGS)
+ return 0;
+
+ *p_config_value = kcalloc(num_configs, sizeof(**p_config_value), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!*p_config_value)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ *p_config_type = kcalloc(num_configs, sizeof(**p_config_type), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!*p_config_type) {
+ kfree(*p_config_value);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+pinctrl_scmi_free_configs(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, u32 num_configs,
+ u32 **p_config_value,
+ enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type **p_config_type)
+{
+ if (num_configs <= SCMI_NUM_CONFIGS)
+ return;
+
+ kfree(*p_config_value);
+ kfree(*p_config_type);
+}
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int _pin,
+ unsigned long *configs,
+ unsigned int num_configs)
+{
+ int i, ret;
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type config_type[SCMI_NUM_CONFIGS];
+ u32 config_value[SCMI_NUM_CONFIGS];
+ enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type *p_config_type = config_type;
+ u32 *p_config_value = config_value;
+ enum pin_config_param param;
+
+ if (!configs || !num_configs)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = pinctrl_scmi_alloc_configs(pctldev, num_configs, &p_config_type,
+ &p_config_value);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
+ param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
+ ret = pinctrl_scmi_map_pinconf_type(param, &p_config_type[i]);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pmx->dev, "Error map pinconf_type %d\n", ret);
+ goto free_config;
+ }
+ p_config_value[i] = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
+ }
+
+ ret = pinctrl_ops->settings_conf(pmx->ph, _pin, PIN_TYPE, num_configs,
+ p_config_type, p_config_value);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(pmx->dev, "Error parsing config %d\n", ret);
+
+free_config:
+ pinctrl_scmi_free_configs(pctldev, num_configs, &p_config_type,
+ &p_config_value);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int group,
+ unsigned long *configs,
+ unsigned int num_configs)
+{
+ int i, ret;
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type config_type[SCMI_NUM_CONFIGS];
+ u32 config_value[SCMI_NUM_CONFIGS];
+ enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type *p_config_type = config_type;
+ u32 *p_config_value = config_value;
+ enum pin_config_param param;
+
+ if (!configs || !num_configs)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = pinctrl_scmi_alloc_configs(pctldev, num_configs, &p_config_type,
+ &p_config_value);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
+ param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
+ ret = pinctrl_scmi_map_pinconf_type(param,
+ &p_config_type[i]);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pmx->dev, "Error map pinconf_type %d\n", ret);
+ goto free_config;
+ }
+
+ p_config_value[i] = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
+ }
+
+ ret = pinctrl_ops->settings_conf(pmx->ph, group, GROUP_TYPE,
+ num_configs, p_config_type,
+ p_config_value);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(pmx->dev, "Error parsing config %d", ret);
+
+free_config:
+ pinctrl_scmi_free_configs(pctldev, num_configs, &p_config_type,
+ &p_config_value);
+ return ret;
+};
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_group_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int group,
+ unsigned long *config)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+ enum pin_config_param config_type;
+ enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type type;
+ u32 config_value;
+
+ if (!config)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ config_type = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
+ ret = pinctrl_scmi_map_pinconf_type(config_type, &type);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(pmx->dev, "Error map pinconf_type %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = pinctrl_ops->settings_get_one(pmx->ph, group, GROUP_TYPE, type,
+ &config_value);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ *config = pinconf_to_config_packed(config_type, config_value);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct pinconf_ops pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_ops = {
+ .is_generic = true,
+ .pin_config_get = pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_get,
+ .pin_config_set = pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_set,
+ .pin_config_group_set = pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_group_set,
+ .pin_config_group_get = pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_group_get,
+ .pin_config_config_dbg_show = pinconf_generic_dump_config,
+};
+
+static int pinctrl_scmi_get_pins(struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx,
+ struct pinctrl_desc *desc)
+{
+ struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
+ unsigned int npins;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ npins = pinctrl_ops->count_get(pmx->ph, PIN_TYPE);
+ /*
+ * npins will never be zero, the scmi pinctrl driver has bailed out
+ * if npins is zero.
+ */
+ pins = devm_kmalloc_array(pmx->dev, npins, sizeof(*pins), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pins)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < npins; i++) {
+ pins[i].number = i;
+ ret = pinctrl_ops->name_get(pmx->ph, i, PIN_TYPE, &pins[i].name);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(pmx->dev, ret,
+ "Can't get name for pin %d", i);
+ }
+
+ desc->npins = npins;
+ desc->pins = pins;
+ dev_dbg(pmx->dev, "got pins %u", npins);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct scmi_device_id scmi_id_table[] = {
+ { SCMI_PROTOCOL_PINCTRL, "pinctrl" },
+ { }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(scmi, scmi_id_table);
+
+static int scmi_pinctrl_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct device *dev = &sdev->dev;
+ struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx;
+ const struct scmi_handle *handle;
+ struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph;
+
+ if (!sdev->handle)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ handle = sdev->handle;
+
+ pinctrl_ops = handle->devm_protocol_get(sdev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PINCTRL, &ph);
+ if (IS_ERR(pinctrl_ops))
+ return PTR_ERR(pinctrl_ops);
+
+ pmx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pmx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ pmx->ph = ph;
+
+ pmx->dev = dev;
+ pmx->pctl_desc.name = DRV_NAME;
+ pmx->pctl_desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ pmx->pctl_desc.pctlops = &pinctrl_scmi_pinctrl_ops;
+ pmx->pctl_desc.pmxops = &pinctrl_scmi_pinmux_ops;
+ pmx->pctl_desc.confops = &pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_ops;
+
+ ret = pinctrl_scmi_get_pins(pmx, &pmx->pctl_desc);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(dev, &pmx->pctl_desc, pmx,
+ &pmx->pctldev);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register pinctrl\n");
+
+ pmx->nr_functions = pinctrl_scmi_get_functions_count(pmx->pctldev);
+ pmx->functions = devm_kcalloc(dev, pmx->nr_functions,
+ sizeof(*pmx->functions), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pmx->functions)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ return pinctrl_enable(pmx->pctldev);
+}
+
+static struct scmi_driver scmi_pinctrl_driver = {
+ .name = DRV_NAME,
+ .probe = scmi_pinctrl_probe,
+ .id_table = scmi_id_table,
+};
+module_scmi_driver(scmi_pinctrl_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Oleksii Moisieiev <[email protected]>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Peng Fan <[email protected]>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ARM SCMI pin controller driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

--
2.37.1


2024-04-02 02:15:52

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support pinctrl protocol

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

Add SCMI v3.2 pinctrl protocol bindings and example.

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
index 4591523b51a0..e9d3f043c4ed 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
@@ -247,6 +247,37 @@ properties:
reg:
const: 0x18

+ protocol@19:
+ type: object
+ allOf:
+ - $ref: '#/$defs/protocol-node'
+ - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pinctrl.yaml
+
+ unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ const: 0x19
+
+ patternProperties:
+ '-pins$':
+ type: object
+ allOf:
+ - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml#
+ - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pinmux-node.yaml#
+ unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+ description:
+ A pin multiplexing sub-node describes how to configure a
+ set of pins in some desired function.
+ A single sub-node may define several pin configurations.
+ This sub-node is using the default pinctrl bindings to configure
+ pin multiplexing and using SCMI protocol to apply a specified
+ configuration.
+
+ required:
+ - reg
+
additionalProperties: false

$defs:
@@ -401,6 +432,25 @@ examples:
scmi_powercap: protocol@18 {
reg = <0x18>;
};
+
+ scmi_pinctrl: protocol@19 {
+ reg = <0x19>;
+
+ i2c2-pins {
+ groups = "g_i2c2_a", "g_i2c2_b";
+ function = "f_i2c2";
+ };
+
+ mdio-pins {
+ groups = "g_avb_mdio";
+ drive-strength = <24>;
+ };
+
+ keys_pins: keys-pins {
+ pins = "gpio_5_17", "gpio_5_20", "gpio_5_22", "gpio_2_1";
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
+ };
};
};


--
2.37.1


2024-04-02 13:59:34

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:22:24AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
>
> scmi-pinctrl driver implements pinctrl driver interface and using
> SCMI protocol to redirect messages from pinctrl subsystem SDK to
> SCMI platform firmware, which does the changes in HW.

..

> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>

Missing headers.

..

> + *p_groups = (const char * const *)func->groups;

Is this casting needed?

..

> +static int pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> + unsigned int _pin, unsigned long *config)

Why underscored parameter name?

..

> +static int pinctrl_scmi_get_pins(struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx,
> + struct pinctrl_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
> + unsigned int npins;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + npins = pinctrl_ops->count_get(pmx->ph, PIN_TYPE);
> + /*
> + * npins will never be zero, the scmi pinctrl driver has bailed out
> + * if npins is zero.
> + */

This is fragile, but at least it is documented.

> + pins = devm_kmalloc_array(pmx->dev, npins, sizeof(*pins), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pins)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < npins; i++) {
> + pins[i].number = i;
> + ret = pinctrl_ops->name_get(pmx->ph, i, PIN_TYPE, &pins[i].name);
> + if (ret)

How does the cleanup work for the previously assigned pin names? Is it needed?
Maybe a comment?

> + return dev_err_probe(pmx->dev, ret,
> + "Can't get name for pin %d", i);
> + }
> +
> + desc->npins = npins;
> + desc->pins = pins;
> + dev_dbg(pmx->dev, "got pins %u", npins);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}

..

> +static const struct scmi_device_id scmi_id_table[] = {
> + { SCMI_PROTOCOL_PINCTRL, "pinctrl" },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(scmi, scmi_id_table);

Move this closer to the user.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



2024-04-02 14:09:33

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:59:19PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:22:24AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:

..

> > > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > > +#include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > Missing headers.
>
> Not sure there is an easy way to filter out what is missed.

And?..

You are the author, not me. You know your code much better and
it will be quite easy to perform. I may miss things, but reading
briefly the 1000 lines and get what headers are required takes
no more than half an hour.

(Tools that help me, in case I don't remember by heart, are
`cscope` and `git grep ...`.)

..

> > > + ret = pinctrl_ops->name_get(pmx->ph, i, PIN_TYPE,
> > &pins[i].name);
> > > + if (ret)
> >
> > How does the cleanup work for the previously assigned pin names? Is it
> > needed?
>
> No need. The "name" memory region is allocated in firmware pinctrl
> Protocol init phase.
>
> > Maybe a comment?
>
> ok. As below.
> /*
> * The region for name is handled by the scmi firmware driver,
> * no need free here
> */

LGTM.

> > > + return dev_err_probe(pmx->dev, ret,
> > > + "Can't get name for pin %d", i);

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



2024-04-02 14:17:26

by Dan Carpenter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:22:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:22:24AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > +static int pinctrl_scmi_get_pins(struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx,
> > + struct pinctrl_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
> > + unsigned int npins;
> > + int ret, i;
> > +
> > + npins = pinctrl_ops->count_get(pmx->ph, PIN_TYPE);
> > + /*
> > + * npins will never be zero, the scmi pinctrl driver has bailed out
> > + * if npins is zero.
> > + */
>
> This is fragile, but at least it is documented.
>

It was never clear to me where the crash would happen if npins was zero.
Does some part of pinctrl internals assume we have at least one pin?

It's nice to be able to allocate zero element arrays and generally it
works well in the kernel. The one common bug with zero element arrays
has to do with strings. Something like this (garbage) example:

str = kmalloc(n_char, GFP_KERNEL);
copy_from_user(str, user_ptr, n_char);
str[n_char - 1] = '\0';

If the str is zero bytes long it will lead to an Oops when we add a NUL
terminator.

regards,
dan carpenter


2024-04-02 14:29:38

by Peng Fan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 4/4] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-
> pinctrl driver
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:22:24AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> >
> > scmi-pinctrl driver implements pinctrl driver interface and using SCMI
> > protocol to redirect messages from pinctrl subsystem SDK to SCMI
> > platform firmware, which does the changes in HW.
>
> ...
>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > +#include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
>
> Missing headers.

Not sure there is an easy way to filter out what is missed.

>
> ...
>
> > + *p_groups = (const char * const *)func->groups;
>
> Is this casting needed?

This is no needed.

>
> ...
>
> > +static int pinctrl_scmi_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > + unsigned int _pin, unsigned long *config)
>
> Why underscored parameter name?

Underscore could be dropped.

>
> ...
>
> > +static int pinctrl_scmi_get_pins(struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx,
> > + struct pinctrl_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
> > + unsigned int npins;
> > + int ret, i;
> > +
> > + npins = pinctrl_ops->count_get(pmx->ph, PIN_TYPE);
> > + /*
> > + * npins will never be zero, the scmi pinctrl driver has bailed out
> > + * if npins is zero.
> > + */
>
> This is fragile, but at least it is documented.
>
> > + pins = devm_kmalloc_array(pmx->dev, npins, sizeof(*pins),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!pins)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < npins; i++) {
> > + pins[i].number = i;
> > + ret = pinctrl_ops->name_get(pmx->ph, i, PIN_TYPE,
> &pins[i].name);
> > + if (ret)
>
> How does the cleanup work for the previously assigned pin names? Is it
> needed?

No need. The "name" memory region is allocated in firmware pinctrl
Protocol init phase.

> Maybe a comment?

ok. As below.
/*
* The region for name is handled by the scmi firmware driver,
* no need free here
*/

>
> > + return dev_err_probe(pmx->dev, ret,
> > + "Can't get name for pin %d", i);
> > + }
> > +
> > + desc->npins = npins;
> > + desc->pins = pins;
> > + dev_dbg(pmx->dev, "got pins %u", npins);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > +static const struct scmi_device_id scmi_id_table[] = {
> > + { SCMI_PROTOCOL_PINCTRL, "pinctrl" },
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(scmi, scmi_id_table);
>
> Move this closer to the user.

ok. Fix in v8.

Thanks,
Peng.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>


2024-04-02 16:40:18

by Cristian Marussi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 05:09:34PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:22:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:22:24AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > +static int pinctrl_scmi_get_pins(struct scmi_pinctrl *pmx,
> > > + struct pinctrl_desc *desc)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
> > > + unsigned int npins;
> > > + int ret, i;
> > > +
> > > + npins = pinctrl_ops->count_get(pmx->ph, PIN_TYPE);
> > > + /*
> > > + * npins will never be zero, the scmi pinctrl driver has bailed out
> > > + * if npins is zero.
> > > + */
> >
> > This is fragile, but at least it is documented.
> >
>
> It was never clear to me where the crash would happen if npins was zero.
> Does some part of pinctrl internals assume we have at least one pin?

Dont think there were any possible crashes since at the protoocl layer
(not here) kcalloc returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR into pinfo->pins for a zero-bytes
allocation BUT it is indeed never accessed since any attempt to access a
pin will be considerd invalid (any u32 index >= (nr_pins=0))...

..but what is the point of loading protocol and drivers with zero pins ?
You can have zero grouos and zero functions, but zero pins ?

Thanks,
Cristian