As the fixed voltage for the LDO is outside the range of the adjustable voltage mode,
the constraints for this scenario are not suitable to represent both modes.
Therefore, A property is added to specify the fixed LDO VOUT.
Examples of fixed LDO VOUT and adjustable LDO VOUT is also added to this version.
Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rtq2208.yaml | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rtq2208.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rtq2208.yaml
index 609c066..87accc6 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rtq2208.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rtq2208.yaml
@@ -75,6 +75,12 @@ properties:
description:
regulator description for ldo[1-2].
+ properties:
+ richtek,fixed-microvolt:
+ description: |
+ This property can be used to set a fixed operating voltage that lies outside
+ the range of the regulator's adjustable mode.
+
required:
- compatible
- reg
@@ -177,6 +183,8 @@ examples:
};
};
ldo1 {
+ /* Fixed LDO VOUT */
+ richtek,fixed-microvolt = <1200000>;
regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
regulator-always-on;
@@ -185,7 +193,8 @@ examples:
};
};
ldo2 {
- regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
+ /* Adjustable LDO VOUT */
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
regulator-always-on;
regulator-state-mem {
--
2.7.4
On 28/05/2024 08:01, Alina Yu wrote:
> As the fixed voltage for the LDO is outside the range of the adjustable voltage mode,
> the constraints for this scenario are not suitable to represent both modes.
> Therefore, A property is added to specify the fixed LDO VOUT.
>
> Examples of fixed LDO VOUT and adjustable LDO VOUT is also added to this version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <[email protected]>
Nothing improved. Where is the changelog and versioning? I already asked
about this.
Also,
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Best regards,
Krzysztof