Hi Anson,
why did you resend the series?
On 02/07/2019 09:55, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
>
> More and more platforms use platform driver model for clock driver,
> so the clock driver is NOT ready during timer initialization phase,
> it will cause timer initialization failed.
>
> To support those platforms with upper scenario, introducing a new
> flag TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY which is mutually exclusive with
> TIMER_OF_CLOCK flag to support getting timer clock frequency from
> DT's timer node, the property name should be "clock-frequency",
> then of_clk operations can be skipped.
>
> User needs to select either TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY or TIMER_OF_CLOCK
> flag if want to use timer-of driver to initialize the clock rate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes since V3:
> - use hardcoded "clock-frequency" instead of adding new variable prop_name;
> - add pre-condition check for TIMER_OF_CLOCK and TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY, they MUST be exclusive.
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h | 7 ++++---
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c
> index 8054228..858f684 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c
> @@ -161,11 +161,30 @@ static __init int timer_of_base_init(struct device_node *np,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static __init int timer_of_clk_frequency_init(struct device_node *np,
> + struct of_timer_clk *of_clk)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 rate;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &rate);
> + if (!ret) {
> + of_clk->rate = rate;
> + of_clk->period = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate, HZ);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int __init timer_of_init(struct device_node *np, struct timer_of *to)
> {
> + unsigned long clock_flags = TIMER_OF_CLOCK | TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
> int flags = 0;
>
> + if ((to->flags & clock_flags) == clock_flags)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (to->flags & TIMER_OF_BASE) {
> ret = timer_of_base_init(np, &to->of_base);
> if (ret)
> @@ -180,6 +199,13 @@ int __init timer_of_init(struct device_node *np, struct timer_of *to)
> flags |= TIMER_OF_CLOCK;
> }
>
> + if (to->flags & TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY) {
> + ret = timer_of_clk_frequency_init(np, &to->of_clk);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_fail;
> + flags |= TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY;
> + }
> +
> if (to->flags & TIMER_OF_IRQ) {
> ret = timer_of_irq_init(np, &to->of_irq);
> if (ret)
> @@ -201,6 +227,9 @@ int __init timer_of_init(struct device_node *np, struct timer_of *to)
> if (flags & TIMER_OF_CLOCK)
> timer_of_clk_exit(&to->of_clk);
>
> + if (flags & TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY)
> + to->of_clk.rate = 0;
> +
> if (flags & TIMER_OF_BASE)
> timer_of_base_exit(&to->of_base);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h
> index a5478f3..a08e108 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h
> @@ -4,9 +4,10 @@
>
> #include <linux/clockchips.h>
>
> -#define TIMER_OF_BASE 0x1
> -#define TIMER_OF_CLOCK 0x2
> -#define TIMER_OF_IRQ 0x4
> +#define TIMER_OF_BASE 0x1
> +#define TIMER_OF_CLOCK 0x2
> +#define TIMER_OF_IRQ 0x4
> +#define TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY 0x8
>
> struct of_timer_irq {
> int irq;
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Hi, Daniel
> Hi Anson,
>
> why did you resend the series?
Previous patch series has build warning and I did NOT notice, sorry for that,
drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c: In function ‘timer_of_init’:
drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c:185:30: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
if (to->flags & clock_flags == clock_flags)
^
so I resend the patch series with below, sorry for missing mention of the changes in resent patch series.
+ if ((to->flags & clock_flags) == clock_flags)
Sorry for mail storm...
Thanks,
Anson
>
>
> On 02/07/2019 09:55, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
> >
> > More and more platforms use platform driver model for clock driver, so
> > the clock driver is NOT ready during timer initialization phase, it
> > will cause timer initialization failed.
> >
> > To support those platforms with upper scenario, introducing a new flag
> > TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY which is mutually exclusive with
> > TIMER_OF_CLOCK flag to support getting timer clock frequency from DT's
> > timer node, the property name should be "clock-frequency", then of_clk
> > operations can be skipped.
> >
> > User needs to select either TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY or
> TIMER_OF_CLOCK
> > flag if want to use timer-of driver to initialize the clock rate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Changes since V3:
> > - use hardcoded "clock-frequency" instead of adding new variable
> prop_name;
> > - add pre-condition check for TIMER_OF_CLOCK and
> TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY, they MUST be exclusive.
> > ---
> > drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h | 7 ++++---
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c
> > b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c index 8054228..858f684 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c
> > @@ -161,11 +161,30 @@ static __init int timer_of_base_init(struct
> device_node *np,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static __init int timer_of_clk_frequency_init(struct device_node *np,
> > + struct of_timer_clk *of_clk) {
> > + int ret;
> > + u32 rate;
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &rate);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + of_clk->rate = rate;
> > + of_clk->period = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate, HZ);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > int __init timer_of_init(struct device_node *np, struct timer_of *to)
> > {
> > + unsigned long clock_flags = TIMER_OF_CLOCK |
> > +TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY;
> > int ret = -EINVAL;
> > int flags = 0;
> >
> > + if ((to->flags & clock_flags) == clock_flags)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > if (to->flags & TIMER_OF_BASE) {
> > ret = timer_of_base_init(np, &to->of_base);
> > if (ret)
> > @@ -180,6 +199,13 @@ int __init timer_of_init(struct device_node *np,
> struct timer_of *to)
> > flags |= TIMER_OF_CLOCK;
> > }
> >
> > + if (to->flags & TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY) {
> > + ret = timer_of_clk_frequency_init(np, &to->of_clk);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out_fail;
> > + flags |= TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (to->flags & TIMER_OF_IRQ) {
> > ret = timer_of_irq_init(np, &to->of_irq);
> > if (ret)
> > @@ -201,6 +227,9 @@ int __init timer_of_init(struct device_node *np,
> struct timer_of *to)
> > if (flags & TIMER_OF_CLOCK)
> > timer_of_clk_exit(&to->of_clk);
> >
> > + if (flags & TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY)
> > + to->of_clk.rate = 0;
> > +
> > if (flags & TIMER_OF_BASE)
> > timer_of_base_exit(&to->of_base);
> > return ret;
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h
> > b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h index a5478f3..a08e108 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h
> > @@ -4,9 +4,10 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/clockchips.h>
> >
> > -#define TIMER_OF_BASE 0x1
> > -#define TIMER_OF_CLOCK 0x2
> > -#define TIMER_OF_IRQ 0x4
> > +#define TIMER_OF_BASE 0x1
> > +#define TIMER_OF_CLOCK 0x2
> > +#define TIMER_OF_IRQ 0x4
> > +#define TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY 0x8
> >
> > struct of_timer_irq {
> > int irq;
On 02/07/2019 11:03, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Daniel
>
>> Hi Anson,
>>
>> why did you resend the series?
>
> Previous patch series has build warning and I did NOT notice, sorry for that,
>
> drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c: In function ‘timer_of_init’:
> drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c:185:30: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
> if (to->flags & clock_flags == clock_flags)
> ^
>
> so I resend the patch series with below, sorry for missing mention of the changes in resent patch series.
>
> + if ((to->flags & clock_flags) == clock_flags)
>
> Sorry for mail storm...
No problem at all, I prefer this caught and fixed early :)
Next time just send a V5 because 'resend' means there is no change but
there was a problem with the email (could be also interpreted as a
gentle ping).
>> On 02/07/2019 09:55, [email protected] wrote:
>>> From: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> More and more platforms use platform driver model for clock driver, so
>>> the clock driver is NOT ready during timer initialization phase, it
>>> will cause timer initialization failed.
>>>
>>> To support those platforms with upper scenario, introducing a new flag
>>> TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY which is mutually exclusive with
>>> TIMER_OF_CLOCK flag to support getting timer clock frequency from DT's
>>> timer node, the property name should be "clock-frequency", then of_clk
>>> operations can be skipped.
>>>
>>> User needs to select either TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY or
>> TIMER_OF_CLOCK
>>> flag if want to use timer-of driver to initialize the clock rate.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since V3:
>>> - use hardcoded "clock-frequency" instead of adding new variable
>> prop_name;
>>> - add pre-condition check for TIMER_OF_CLOCK and
>> TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY, they MUST be exclusive.
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h | 7 ++++---
>>> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c
>>> b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c index 8054228..858f684 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c
>>> @@ -161,11 +161,30 @@ static __init int timer_of_base_init(struct
>> device_node *np,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static __init int timer_of_clk_frequency_init(struct device_node *np,
>>> + struct of_timer_clk *of_clk) {
>>> + int ret;
>>> + u32 rate;
>>> +
>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &rate);
>>> + if (!ret) {
>>> + of_clk->rate = rate;
>>> + of_clk->period = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate, HZ);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int __init timer_of_init(struct device_node *np, struct timer_of *to)
>>> {
>>> + unsigned long clock_flags = TIMER_OF_CLOCK |
>>> +TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY;
>>> int ret = -EINVAL;
>>> int flags = 0;
>>>
>>> + if ((to->flags & clock_flags) == clock_flags)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> if (to->flags & TIMER_OF_BASE) {
>>> ret = timer_of_base_init(np, &to->of_base);
>>> if (ret)
>>> @@ -180,6 +199,13 @@ int __init timer_of_init(struct device_node *np,
>> struct timer_of *to)
>>> flags |= TIMER_OF_CLOCK;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (to->flags & TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY) {
>>> + ret = timer_of_clk_frequency_init(np, &to->of_clk);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto out_fail;
>>> + flags |= TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (to->flags & TIMER_OF_IRQ) {
>>> ret = timer_of_irq_init(np, &to->of_irq);
>>> if (ret)
>>> @@ -201,6 +227,9 @@ int __init timer_of_init(struct device_node *np,
>> struct timer_of *to)
>>> if (flags & TIMER_OF_CLOCK)
>>> timer_of_clk_exit(&to->of_clk);
>>>
>>> + if (flags & TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY)
>>> + to->of_clk.rate = 0;
>>> +
>>> if (flags & TIMER_OF_BASE)
>>> timer_of_base_exit(&to->of_base);
>>> return ret;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h
>>> b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h index a5478f3..a08e108 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-of.h
>>> @@ -4,9 +4,10 @@
>>>
>>> #include <linux/clockchips.h>
>>>
>>> -#define TIMER_OF_BASE 0x1
>>> -#define TIMER_OF_CLOCK 0x2
>>> -#define TIMER_OF_IRQ 0x4
>>> +#define TIMER_OF_BASE 0x1
>>> +#define TIMER_OF_CLOCK 0x2
>>> +#define TIMER_OF_IRQ 0x4
>>> +#define TIMER_OF_CLOCK_FREQUENCY 0x8
>>>
>>> struct of_timer_irq {
>>> int irq;
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Hi, Daniel
> On 02/07/2019 11:03, Anson Huang wrote:
> > Hi, Daniel
> >
> >> Hi Anson,
> >>
> >> why did you resend the series?
> >
> > Previous patch series has build warning and I did NOT notice, sorry
> > for that,
> >
> > drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c: In function ‘timer_of_init’:
> > drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c:185:30: warning: suggest parentheses
> around comparison in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
> > if (to->flags & clock_flags == clock_flags)
> > ^
> >
> > so I resend the patch series with below, sorry for missing mention of the
> changes in resent patch series.
> >
> > + if ((to->flags & clock_flags) == clock_flags)
> >
> > Sorry for mail storm...
>
> No problem at all, I prefer this caught and fixed early :)
>
> Next time just send a V5 because 'resend' means there is no change but
> there was a problem with the email (could be also interpreted as a gentle
> ping).
OK, will keep it in mind, thanks for sharing useful experience!
Thanks,
Anson