2020-09-16 02:58:27

by Chunxin Zang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5] mm/vmscan: add a fatal signals check in drop_slab_node

From: Chunxin Zang <[email protected]>

On our server, there are about 10k memcg in one machine. They use memory
very frequently. We have observed that drop_caches can take a
considerable amount of time, and can't stop it.

There are two reasons:
1. There is somebody constantly generating more objects to reclaim
on drop_caches, result the 'freed' always bigger than 10.
2. The process has no chance to process signals.

We can get the following info through 'ps':

root:~# ps -aux | grep drop
root 357956 ... R Aug25 21119854:55 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 1771385 ... R Aug16 21146421:17 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

Add a bail out on the fatal signals in the main loop so that the
operation can be terminated by userspace.

Signed-off-by: Chunxin Zang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
---
changelogs in v5:
1) v4 patch used wrong branch, very apologies about that.

changelogs in v4:
changelogs in v3:
1) Fix some descriptive problems pointed out by Michal Hocko.
v2 named: mm/vmscan: fix infinite loop in drop_slab_node

changelogs in v2:
1) via check fatal signal break loop.

mm/vmscan.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index b6d84326bdf2..c3ed8b45d264 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -704,6 +704,9 @@ void drop_slab_node(int nid)
do {
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;

+ if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
+ return;
+
freed = 0;
memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
do {
--
2.11.0


2020-09-16 06:11:45

by Michal Hocko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm/vmscan: add a fatal signals check in drop_slab_node

On Wed 16-09-20 10:53:59, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Chunxin Zang <[email protected]>
>
> On our server, there are about 10k memcg in one machine. They use memory
> very frequently. We have observed that drop_caches can take a
> considerable amount of time, and can't stop it.
>
> There are two reasons:
> 1. There is somebody constantly generating more objects to reclaim
> on drop_caches, result the 'freed' always bigger than 10.
> 2. The process has no chance to process signals.
>
> We can get the following info through 'ps':
>
> root:~# ps -aux | grep drop
> root 357956 ... R Aug25 21119854:55 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> root 1771385 ... R Aug16 21146421:17 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> Add a bail out on the fatal signals in the main loop so that the
> operation can be terminated by userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunxin Zang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

> ---
> changelogs in v5:
> 1) v4 patch used wrong branch, very apologies about that.
>
> changelogs in v4:
> changelogs in v3:
> 1) Fix some descriptive problems pointed out by Michal Hocko.
> v2 named: mm/vmscan: fix infinite loop in drop_slab_node
>
> changelogs in v2:
> 1) via check fatal signal break loop.
>
> mm/vmscan.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index b6d84326bdf2..c3ed8b45d264 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -704,6 +704,9 @@ void drop_slab_node(int nid)
> do {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
>
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + return;
> +
> freed = 0;
> memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
> do {
> --
> 2.11.0
>

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

2020-09-16 19:03:40

by Chris Down

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm/vmscan: add a fatal signals check in drop_slab_node

[email protected] writes:
>From: Chunxin Zang <[email protected]>
>
>On our server, there are about 10k memcg in one machine. They use memory
>very frequently. We have observed that drop_caches can take a
>considerable amount of time, and can't stop it.
>
>There are two reasons:
>1. There is somebody constantly generating more objects to reclaim
> on drop_caches, result the 'freed' always bigger than 10.
>2. The process has no chance to process signals.
>
>We can get the following info through 'ps':
>
> root:~# ps -aux | grep drop
> root 357956 ... R Aug25 21119854:55 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> root 1771385 ... R Aug16 21146421:17 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
>Add a bail out on the fatal signals in the main loop so that the
>operation can be terminated by userspace.
>
>Signed-off-by: Chunxin Zang <[email protected]>
>Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Chris Down <[email protected]>

2020-09-16 19:10:29

by David Hildenbrand

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm/vmscan: add a fatal signals check in drop_slab_node

On 16.09.20 04:53, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Chunxin Zang <[email protected]>
>
> On our server, there are about 10k memcg in one machine. They use memory
> very frequently. We have observed that drop_caches can take a
> considerable amount of time, and can't stop it.
>
> There are two reasons:
> 1. There is somebody constantly generating more objects to reclaim
> on drop_caches, result the 'freed' always bigger than 10.
> 2. The process has no chance to process signals.
>
> We can get the following info through 'ps':
>
> root:~# ps -aux | grep drop
> root 357956 ... R Aug25 21119854:55 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> root 1771385 ... R Aug16 21146421:17 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> Add a bail out on the fatal signals in the main loop so that the
> operation can be terminated by userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunxin Zang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>

^ he did not actually send that, no? Maybe co-developed-by ?

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb