2022-04-20 19:06:42

by Jes B. Klinke

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] tpm: cr50: Add new device/vendor ID 0x504a6666

Accept one additional numerical value of DID:VID for next generation
Google TPM with new firmware, to be used in future Chromebooks.

The TPM with the new firmware has the code name TI50, and is going to
use the same interfaces.

Signed-off-by: Jes B. Klinke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
---

drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
index f6c0affbb4567..4ddb8ff3a8569 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_SHORT_MS 2 /* Short timeout during transactions */
#define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_NOIRQ_MS 20 /* Timeout for TPM ready without IRQ */
#define TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID 0x00281ae0L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
+#define TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID 0x504a6666L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
#define TPM_CR50_I2C_MAX_RETRIES 3 /* Max retries due to I2C errors */
#define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_LO 55 /* Min usecs between retries on I2C */
#define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_HI 65 /* Max usecs between retries on I2C */
@@ -742,15 +743,15 @@ static int tpm_cr50_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
}

vendor = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)buf);
- if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID) {
+ if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID && vendor != TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID) {
dev_err(dev, "Vendor ID did not match! ID was %08x\n", vendor);
tpm_cr50_release_locality(chip, true);
return -ENODEV;
}

- dev_info(dev, "cr50 TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
+ dev_info(dev, "%s TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
+ vendor == TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID ? "ti50" : "cr50",
client->addr, client->irq, vendor >> 16);
-
return tpm_chip_register(chip);
}

--
2.36.0.rc0.470.gd361397f0d-goog


2022-04-22 18:38:32

by Jarkko Sakkinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: cr50: Add new device/vendor ID 0x504a6666

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 09:07:21AM -0700, Jes Klinke wrote:
> Dear Paul,
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 3:52 AM Paul Menzel <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Jes,
> >
> >
> > Am 20.04.22 um 01:37 schrieb Jes B. Klinke:
> > > Accept one additional numerical value of DID:VID for next generation
> > > Google TPM with new firmware, to be used in future Chromebooks.
> > >
> > > The TPM with the new firmware has the code name TI50, and is going to
> > > use the same interfaces.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jes B. Klinke <[email protected]>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c | 7 ++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > > index f6c0affbb4567..4ddb8ff3a8569 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> > > #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_SHORT_MS 2 /* Short timeout during transactions */
> > > #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_NOIRQ_MS 20 /* Timeout for TPM ready without IRQ */
> > > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID 0x00281ae0L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
> > > +#define TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID 0x504a6666L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
> > > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_MAX_RETRIES 3 /* Max retries due to I2C errors */
> > > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_LO 55 /* Min usecs between retries on I2C */
> > > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_HI 65 /* Max usecs between retries on I2C */
> > > @@ -742,15 +743,15 @@ static int tpm_cr50_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > }
> > >
> > > vendor = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)buf);
> > > - if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID) {
> > > + if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID && vendor != TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "Vendor ID did not match! ID was %08x\n", vendor);
> > > tpm_cr50_release_locality(chip, true);
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - dev_info(dev, "cr50 TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
> > > + dev_info(dev, "%s TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
> > > + vendor == TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID ? "ti50" : "cr50",
> > > client->addr, client->irq, vendor >> 16);
> > > -
> >
> > Remove this blank line wasn’t needed, I gues.
>
> You are right, I should probably have left the blank line untouched.
> It does not hurt the readability of the code much to remove it,
> though.

I don't mind removing it.

>
> > > return tpm_chip_register(chip);
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Thank for addressing the other comments, and congratulations on getting
> > your first commit into the Linux kernel.
>
> When I think about it, I did propose a kernel patch in 2002, to
> introduce /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern, so this is my second patch.
> All the mailing lists, and formal review process this time seemed
> daunting at first, though, so thank you for guiding me through the
> process.

It gets easier over time when your patch count increases.

Compared to many Github projects, I find actually contributing to kernel
easier than many of those, because form is so rigid, but this of course
happens over time. I.e. over time you can estimate a lot how likely is
patch get to be accepted.

Also it is good to remember that kernel maintainers might sound a bit
impolite, not because they want to be, but when you review dozens of
patches in a day, you have to be somewhat mechanic how you response,
and simply do not have time to be "verbosely polite".

> Regards
> Jes

BR, Jarkko

2022-04-22 19:19:41

by Jes Klinke

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: cr50: Add new device/vendor ID 0x504a6666

Dear Paul,

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 3:52 AM Paul Menzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Jes,
>
>
> Am 20.04.22 um 01:37 schrieb Jes B. Klinke:
> > Accept one additional numerical value of DID:VID for next generation
> > Google TPM with new firmware, to be used in future Chromebooks.
> >
> > The TPM with the new firmware has the code name TI50, and is going to
> > use the same interfaces.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jes B. Klinke <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > index f6c0affbb4567..4ddb8ff3a8569 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> > #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_SHORT_MS 2 /* Short timeout during transactions */
> > #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_NOIRQ_MS 20 /* Timeout for TPM ready without IRQ */
> > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID 0x00281ae0L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
> > +#define TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID 0x504a6666L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
> > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_MAX_RETRIES 3 /* Max retries due to I2C errors */
> > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_LO 55 /* Min usecs between retries on I2C */
> > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_HI 65 /* Max usecs between retries on I2C */
> > @@ -742,15 +743,15 @@ static int tpm_cr50_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > }
> >
> > vendor = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)buf);
> > - if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID) {
> > + if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID && vendor != TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID) {
> > dev_err(dev, "Vendor ID did not match! ID was %08x\n", vendor);
> > tpm_cr50_release_locality(chip, true);
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > - dev_info(dev, "cr50 TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
> > + dev_info(dev, "%s TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
> > + vendor == TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID ? "ti50" : "cr50",
> > client->addr, client->irq, vendor >> 16);
> > -
>
> Remove this blank line wasn’t needed, I gues.

You are right, I should probably have left the blank line untouched.
It does not hurt the readability of the code much to remove it,
though.

> > return tpm_chip_register(chip);
> > }
> >
>
> Thank for addressing the other comments, and congratulations on getting
> your first commit into the Linux kernel.

When I think about it, I did propose a kernel patch in 2002, to
introduce /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern, so this is my second patch.
All the mailing lists, and formal review process this time seemed
daunting at first, though, so thank you for guiding me through the
process.

Regards
Jes

2022-04-22 19:33:45

by Jarkko Sakkinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: cr50: Add new device/vendor ID 0x504a6666

On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 16:37 -0700, Jes B. Klinke wrote:
> Accept one additional numerical value of DID:VID for next generation
> Google TPM with new firmware, to be used in future Chromebooks.
>
> The TPM with the new firmware has the code name TI50, and is going to
> use the same interfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jes B. Klinke <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
> ---
>
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> index f6c0affbb4567..4ddb8ff3a8569 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>  #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_SHORT_MS      2               /* Short timeout during transactions */
>  #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_NOIRQ_MS      20              /* Timeout for TPM ready without IRQ */
>  #define TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID           0x00281ae0L     /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
> +#define TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID           0x504a6666L     /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
>  #define TPM_CR50_I2C_MAX_RETRIES       3               /* Max retries due to I2C errors */
>  #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_LO    55              /* Min usecs between retries on I2C */
>  #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_HI    65              /* Max usecs between retries on I2C */
> @@ -742,15 +743,15 @@ static int tpm_cr50_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>         }
>  
>         vendor = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)buf);
> -       if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID) {
> +       if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID && vendor != TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID) {
>                 dev_err(dev, "Vendor ID did not match! ID was %08x\n", vendor);
>                 tpm_cr50_release_locality(chip, true);
>                 return -ENODEV;
>         }
>  
> -       dev_info(dev, "cr50 TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
> +       dev_info(dev, "%s TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
> +                vendor == TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID ? "ti50" : "cr50",
>                  client->addr, client->irq, vendor >> 16);
> -
>         return tpm_chip_register(chip);
>  }
>  

Thank you, I just picked this.

BR, Jarkko

2022-04-22 20:30:41

by Paul Menzel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: cr50: Add new device/vendor ID 0x504a6666

Dear Jes,


Am 20.04.22 um 01:37 schrieb Jes B. Klinke:
> Accept one additional numerical value of DID:VID for next generation
> Google TPM with new firmware, to be used in future Chromebooks.
>
> The TPM with the new firmware has the code name TI50, and is going to
> use the same interfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jes B. Klinke <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> index f6c0affbb4567..4ddb8ff3a8569 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_SHORT_MS 2 /* Short timeout during transactions */
> #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_NOIRQ_MS 20 /* Timeout for TPM ready without IRQ */
> #define TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID 0x00281ae0L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
> +#define TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID 0x504a6666L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
> #define TPM_CR50_I2C_MAX_RETRIES 3 /* Max retries due to I2C errors */
> #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_LO 55 /* Min usecs between retries on I2C */
> #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_HI 65 /* Max usecs between retries on I2C */
> @@ -742,15 +743,15 @@ static int tpm_cr50_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> }
>
> vendor = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)buf);
> - if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID) {
> + if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID && vendor != TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID) {
> dev_err(dev, "Vendor ID did not match! ID was %08x\n", vendor);
> tpm_cr50_release_locality(chip, true);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - dev_info(dev, "cr50 TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
> + dev_info(dev, "%s TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
> + vendor == TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID ? "ti50" : "cr50",
> client->addr, client->irq, vendor >> 16);
> -

Remove this blank line wasn’t needed, I gues.

> return tpm_chip_register(chip);
> }
>

Thank for addressing the other comments, and congratulations on getting
your first commit into the Linux kernel.


Kind regards,

Paul