2017-11-10 00:47:21

by Shawn Lin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Lorenzo Pieralisi for PCI host bridge drivers

Hi Bjorn,

On 2017/11/9 23:05, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 11:28:36AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> On Thursday 09 November 2017 01:56 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:15:10PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>> From: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Add Lorenzo Pieralisi as maintainer for PCI native host bridge drivers and
>>>> the endpoint driver framework.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> This is on my for-linus branch, and I intend to merge it for v4.14.
>>
>> There is already an entry for PCI endpoint in MAINTAINERS file. Can Lorenzo be
>> added there?
>>
>> PCI ENDPOINT SUBSYSTEM
>> M: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
>> L: [email protected]
>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/pci-endpoint.git
>> S: Supported
>> F: drivers/pci/endpoint/
>> F: drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
>> F: tools/pci/
>
> Right, thanks, I forgot all about this separate entry. I added Lorenzo
> there, resulting in the patch below.
>
> My practice has been that all the PCI patches (everything in
> drivers/pci plus some include and x86/pci stuff) have been merged via
> my tree.
>
> This includes things in drivers/pci/{host,dwc,endpoint,switch}, which
> are non-core things and usually specific to a chipset. I try to
> ensure they have individual maintainers designated, and I ask for
> their acks for non-trivial changes because I have no specs and no
> hardware for testing them. But I think it's still good to have one
> person look over them all to try to keep some consistency across them
> because they are all quite similar.
>
> So my hope is that Lorenzo can take over that oversight role from me,
> not that he would replace any of those designated maintainers.
>
> Ideally, this will be transparent to patch submitters except that they
> should add Lorenzo to the "To:" line (keeping linux-pci and other
> interested parties).
>
>
> commit 6b7be529634bbfbf6395f23217a66d731fbed0a0
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed Nov 8 08:49:49 2017 -0600
>
> MAINTAINERS: Add Lorenzo Pieralisi for PCI host bridge drivers
>
> Add Lorenzo Pieralisi as maintainer for PCI native host bridge drivers and
> the endpoint driver framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index db412a627d96..6ce341e86fec 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -10378,6 +10378,7 @@ F: drivers/pci/dwc/*keystone*
>
> PCI ENDPOINT SUBSYSTEM
> M: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
> +M: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
> L: [email protected]
> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/pci-endpoint.git
> S: Supported
> @@ -10429,6 +10430,15 @@ F: include/linux/pci*
> F: arch/x86/pci/
> F: arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
>
> +PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS
> +M: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
> +L: [email protected]
> +Q: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/
> +T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/pci.git/

So, does that mean the patch(es) for host drivers shoube be based on
this tree instead of yours? If yes, which tree should be preferred if
a patchset wanna touch both of pci core and host drivers?

> +S: Supported
> +F: drivers/pci/host/
> +F: drivers/pci/dwc/
> +
> PCIE DRIVER FOR AXIS ARTPEC
> M: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
> M: Jesper Nilsson <[email protected]>
>
>
>


From 1583601434905495576@xxx Thu Nov 09 15:06:55 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583530315794719554
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread