From: Yahu Gao <[email protected]>
Simplify the condition used in ata_dev_revalidate() to not
issue identify commands to port multiplier devices.
Signed-off-by: Yahu Gao <[email protected]>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
Changes since V1:
1. Update the subject
2. Add more descriptive
3. Remove review-by without email
4. keep "ata_class_enabled(new_class) &&" condition
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 14c17c3bda4e..2c9472b00f17 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -3802,11 +3802,7 @@ int ata_dev_revalidate(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned int new_class,
return -ENODEV;
/* fail early if !ATA && !ATAPI to avoid issuing [P]IDENTIFY to PMP */
- if (ata_class_enabled(new_class) &&
- new_class != ATA_DEV_ATA &&
- new_class != ATA_DEV_ATAPI &&
- new_class != ATA_DEV_ZAC &&
- new_class != ATA_DEV_SEMB) {
+ if (ata_class_enabled(new_class) && new_class == ATA_DEV_PMP) {
ata_dev_info(dev, "class mismatch %u != %u\n",
dev->class, new_class);
rc = -ENODEV;
--
2.39.1
On 5/15/23 11:36, Yahu Gao wrote:
> From: Yahu Gao <[email protected]>
>
> Simplify the condition used in ata_dev_revalidate() to not
> issue identify commands to port multiplier devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yahu Gao <[email protected]>
Applied to for-6.5 with a fixed up commit title (typo... please run
scripts/checkpatch.pl next time). Thanks !
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Changes since V1:
> 1. Update the subject
> 2. Add more descriptive
> 3. Remove review-by without email
> 4. keep "ata_class_enabled(new_class) &&" condition
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> index 14c17c3bda4e..2c9472b00f17 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> @@ -3802,11 +3802,7 @@ int ata_dev_revalidate(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned int new_class,
> return -ENODEV;
>
> /* fail early if !ATA && !ATAPI to avoid issuing [P]IDENTIFY to PMP */
> - if (ata_class_enabled(new_class) &&
> - new_class != ATA_DEV_ATA &&
> - new_class != ATA_DEV_ATAPI &&
> - new_class != ATA_DEV_ZAC &&
> - new_class != ATA_DEV_SEMB) {
> + if (ata_class_enabled(new_class) && new_class == ATA_DEV_PMP) {
> ata_dev_info(dev, "class mismatch %u != %u\n",
> dev->class, new_class);
> rc = -ENODEV;
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research