2021-04-15 15:16:08

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.10.31-rc1

Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
xen/events: fix setting irq affinity

Russell King <[email protected]>
net: sfp: cope with SFPs that set both LOS normal and LOS inverted

Russell King <[email protected]>
net: sfp: relax bitrate-derived mode check

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
perf map: Tighten snprintf() string precision to pass gcc check on some 32-bit arches

Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
netfilter: x_tables: fix compat match/target pad out-of-bound write

Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
block: don't ignore REQ_NOWAIT for direct IO

Zihao Yu <[email protected]>
riscv,entry: fix misaligned base for excp_vect_table

Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
io_uring: don't mark S_ISBLK async work as unbounded

Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
null_blk: fix command timeout completion handling

Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
idr test suite: Create anchor before launching throbber

Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
idr test suite: Take RCU read lock in idr_find_test_1

Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
radix tree test suite: Register the main thread with the RCU library

Yufen Yu <[email protected]>
block: only update parent bi_status when bio fail

Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
radix tree test suite: Fix compilation

Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
XArray: Fix splitting to non-zero orders

Mikko Perttunen <[email protected]>
gpu: host1x: Use different lock classes for each client

Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
drm/tegra: dc: Don't set PLL clock to 0Hz

Stefan Raspl <[email protected]>
tools/kvm_stat: Add restart delay

Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
ftrace: Check if pages were allocated before calling free_pages()

Bob Peterson <[email protected]>
gfs2: report "already frozen/thawed" errors

Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
drm/imx: imx-ldb: fix out of bounds array access warning

Suzuki K Poulose <[email protected]>
KVM: arm64: Disable guest access to trace filter controls

Suzuki K Poulose <[email protected]>
KVM: arm64: Hide system instruction access to Trace registers

Andrew Price <[email protected]>
gfs2: Flag a withdraw if init_threads() fails

Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
interconnect: core: fix error return code of icc_link_destroy()


-------------

Diffstat:

Makefile | 4 +--
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 -
arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c | 2 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 1 +
block/bio.c | 2 +-
drivers/block/null_blk.h | 1 +
drivers/block/null_blk_main.c | 26 ++++++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c | 10 +++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c | 10 +++----
drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c | 10 ++++---
drivers/interconnect/core.c | 2 ++
drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c | 11 ++++----
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 36 +++++++++++++++----------
drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 4 +--
fs/block_dev.c | 4 +++
fs/gfs2/super.c | 14 ++++++----
fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
include/linux/host1x.h | 9 ++++++-
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 9 ++++---
lib/test_xarray.c | 26 +++++++++---------
lib/xarray.c | 4 +--
net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c | 2 ++
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c | 2 ++
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c | 2 ++
net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 10 ++-----
tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat.service | 1 +
tools/perf/util/map.c | 7 +++--
tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c | 10 +++++--
tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/compiler_types.h | 0
tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c | 2 ++
tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray.c | 2 ++
32 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)



2021-04-15 15:16:21

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 05/25] drm/imx: imx-ldb: fix out of bounds array access warning

From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 33ce7f2f95cabb5834cf0906308a5cb6103976da ]

When CONFIG_OF is disabled, building with 'make W=1' produces warnings
about out of bounds array access:

drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c: In function 'imx_ldb_set_clock.constprop':
drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c:186:8: error: array subscript -22 is below array bounds of 'struct clk *[4]' [-Werror=array-bounds]

Add an error check before the index is used, which helps with the
warning, as well as any possible other error condition that may be
triggered at runtime.

The warning could be fixed by adding a Kconfig depedency on CONFIG_OF,
but Liu Ying points out that the driver may hit the out-of-bounds
problem at runtime anyway.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Liu Ying <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c
index 41e2978cb1eb..75036aaa0c63 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c
@@ -190,6 +190,11 @@ static void imx_ldb_encoder_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
int dual = ldb->ldb_ctrl & LDB_SPLIT_MODE_EN;
int mux = drm_of_encoder_active_port_id(imx_ldb_ch->child, encoder);

+ if (mux < 0 || mux >= ARRAY_SIZE(ldb->clk_sel)) {
+ dev_warn(ldb->dev, "%s: invalid mux %d\n", __func__, mux);
+ return;
+ }
+
drm_panel_prepare(imx_ldb_ch->panel);

if (dual) {
@@ -248,6 +253,11 @@ imx_ldb_encoder_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
int mux = drm_of_encoder_active_port_id(imx_ldb_ch->child, encoder);
u32 bus_format = imx_ldb_ch->bus_format;

+ if (mux < 0 || mux >= ARRAY_SIZE(ldb->clk_sel)) {
+ dev_warn(ldb->dev, "%s: invalid mux %d\n", __func__, mux);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (mode->clock > 170000) {
dev_warn(ldb->dev,
"%s: mode exceeds 170 MHz pixel clock\n", __func__);
--
2.30.2



2021-04-15 15:16:26

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 14/25] radix tree test suite: Register the main thread with the RCU library

From: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 1bb4bd266cf39fd2fa711f2d265c558b92df1119 ]

Several test runners register individual worker threads with the
RCU library, but neglect to register the main thread, which can lead
to objects being freed while the main thread is in what appears to be
an RCU critical section.

Reported-by: Chris von Recklinghausen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c | 2 ++
tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c | 2 ++
tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c
index 3b796dd5e577..44ceff95a9b3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/idr-test.c
@@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ void ida_tests(void)

int __weak main(void)
{
+ rcu_register_thread();
radix_tree_init();
idr_checks();
ida_tests();
@@ -584,5 +585,6 @@ int __weak main(void)
rcu_barrier();
if (nr_allocated)
printf("nr_allocated = %d\n", nr_allocated);
+ rcu_unregister_thread();
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c
index 9eae0fb5a67d..e00520cc6349 100644
--- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c
+++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c
@@ -224,7 +224,9 @@ void multiorder_checks(void)

int __weak main(void)
{
+ rcu_register_thread();
radix_tree_init();
multiorder_checks();
+ rcu_unregister_thread();
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray.c
index e61e43efe463..f20e12cbbfd4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray.c
+++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray.c
@@ -25,11 +25,13 @@ void xarray_tests(void)

int __weak main(void)
{
+ rcu_register_thread();
radix_tree_init();
xarray_tests();
radix_tree_cpu_dead(1);
rcu_barrier();
if (nr_allocated)
printf("nr_allocated = %d\n", nr_allocated);
+ rcu_unregister_thread();
return 0;
}
--
2.30.2



2021-04-15 15:16:54

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 20/25] block: dont ignore REQ_NOWAIT for direct IO

From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit f8b78caf21d5bc3fcfc40c18898f9d52ed1451a5 ]

If IOCB_NOWAIT is set on submission, then that needs to get propagated to
REQ_NOWAIT on the block side. Otherwise we completely lose this
information, and any issuer of IOCB_NOWAIT IO will potentially end up
blocking on eg request allocation on the storage side.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 6516051807b8..718533f0fb90 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -280,6 +280,8 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO_simple(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
bio.bi_opf = dio_bio_write_op(iocb);
task_io_account_write(ret);
}
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ bio.bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
bio_set_polled(&bio, iocb);

@@ -433,6 +435,8 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, int nr_pages)
bio->bi_opf = dio_bio_write_op(iocb);
task_io_account_write(bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
}
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;

dio->size += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
pos += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
--
2.30.2



2021-04-15 15:17:16

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 09/25] drm/tegra: dc: Dont set PLL clock to 0Hz

From: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit f8fb97c915954fc6de6513cdf277103b5c6df7b3 ]

RGB output doesn't allow to change parent clock rate of the display and
PCLK rate is set to 0Hz in this case. The tegra_dc_commit_state() shall
not set the display clock to 0Hz since this change propagates to the
parent clock. The DISP clock is defined as a NODIV clock by the tegra-clk
driver and all NODIV clocks use the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag.

This bug stayed unnoticed because by default PLLP is used as the parent
clock for the display controller and PLLP silently skips the erroneous 0Hz
rate changes because it always has active child clocks that don't permit
rate changes. The PLLP isn't acceptable for some devices that we want to
upstream (like Samsung Galaxy Tab and ASUS TF700T) due to a display panel
clock rate requirements that can't be fulfilled by using PLLP and then the
bug pops up in this case since parent clock is set to 0Hz, killing the
display output.

Don't touch DC clock if pclk=0 in order to fix the problem.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
index 3a244ef7f30f..3aa9a7406085 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
@@ -1688,6 +1688,11 @@ static void tegra_dc_commit_state(struct tegra_dc *dc,
dev_err(dc->dev,
"failed to set clock rate to %lu Hz\n",
state->pclk);
+
+ err = clk_set_rate(dc->clk, state->pclk);
+ if (err < 0)
+ dev_err(dc->dev, "failed to set clock %pC to %lu Hz: %d\n",
+ dc->clk, state->pclk, err);
}

DRM_DEBUG_KMS("rate: %lu, div: %u\n", clk_get_rate(dc->clk),
@@ -1698,11 +1703,6 @@ static void tegra_dc_commit_state(struct tegra_dc *dc,
value = SHIFT_CLK_DIVIDER(state->div) | PIXEL_CLK_DIVIDER_PCD1;
tegra_dc_writel(dc, value, DC_DISP_DISP_CLOCK_CONTROL);
}
-
- err = clk_set_rate(dc->clk, state->pclk);
- if (err < 0)
- dev_err(dc->dev, "failed to set clock %pC to %lu Hz: %d\n",
- dc->clk, state->pclk, err);
}

static void tegra_dc_stop(struct tegra_dc *dc)
--
2.30.2



2021-04-15 15:17:44

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 08/25] tools/kvm_stat: Add restart delay

From: Stefan Raspl <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 75f94ecbd0dfd2ac4e671f165f5ae864b7301422 ]

If this service is enabled and the system rebooted, Systemd's initial
attempt to start this unit file may fail in case the kvm module is not
loaded. Since we did not specify a delay for the retries, Systemd
restarts with a minimum delay a number of times before giving up and
disabling the service. Which means a subsequent kvm module load will
have kvm running without monitoring.
Adding a delay to fix this.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Raspl <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat.service | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat.service b/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat.service
index 71aabaffe779..8f13b843d5b4 100644
--- a/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat.service
+++ b/tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat.service
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Type=simple
ExecStart=/usr/bin/kvm_stat -dtcz -s 10 -L /var/log/kvm_stat.csv
ExecReload=/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID
Restart=always
+RestartSec=60s
SyslogIdentifier=kvm_stat
SyslogLevel=debug

--
2.30.2



2021-04-15 19:12:44

by Pavel Machek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any kernel problems here: (some boards
are unavailable)

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4.4.y
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4.19.y
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany


Attachments:
(No filename) (863.00 B)
signature.asc (188.00 B)
Digital signature
Download all attachments

2021-04-15 20:06:27

by Andrei Rabusov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

I found no issues with my i686 (gcc 10.3)
Selftests result [ok/not ok]: 1434/82
No regressions compared to 5.10.30-rc1

Tested-by: Andrei Rabusov <[email protected]>

2021-04-15 23:47:36

by Shuah Khan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review

On 4/15/21 8:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>

thanks,
-- Shuah

2021-04-16 02:29:18

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review



On 4/15/2021 7:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian

2021-04-16 11:25:15

by Naresh Kamboju

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.31-rc1
* git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git',
'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc']
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 32f5704a0a4f7dcc8aa74a49dbcce359d758f6d5
* git describe: v5.10.30-26-g32f5704a0a4f
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.30-26-g32f5704a0a4f

## No regressions (compared to v5.10.30)

## No fixes (compared to v5.10.30)

## Test result summary
total: 72955, pass: 61311, fail: 1785, skip: 9589, xfail: 270,

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-vsyscall-mod[
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native-
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

2021-04-16 21:58:05

by Fox Chen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:47:54 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

5.10.31-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)

Tested-by: Fox Chen <[email protected]>

2021-04-16 22:38:21

by Sudip Mukherjee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 10.3.1 20210416): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 10.3.1 20210416): 105 configs -> no new failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
arm: Booted on rpi3b. No regression.

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>

--
Regards
Sudip

2021-04-17 01:04:17

by Zou Wei

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.31-rc1 review



On 2021/4/15 22:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.31 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:44:01 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.31-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.31-rc1,

Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.31-rc1
Commit: 32f5704a0a4f7dcc8aa74a49dbcce359d758f6d5
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 5764
passed: 5764
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 5764
passed: 5764
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Tested-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>