As discussed in Message-ID <[email protected]>.
We all agree that userspace MSR twiddling is non-ideal, but we should be
a bit cautious of taking up too much kmsg buffer if applications do
repeated writes. `allow_writes=1` is possible, but is non-ideal (see
patch 1 changelog).
Also added pid information to the message, since it makes identification
of the source (more or less) unambiguous.
Changes in v2:
- Fixed mostly aesthetic suggestions from Boris. Thanks! :-)
Chris Down (2):
x86: Prevent userspace MSR access from dominating the console
x86: Make source of unrecognised MSR writes unambiguous
arch/x86/kernel/msr.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.28.0
Applications which manipulate MSRs from userspace often do so
infrequently, and all at once. As such, the default printk ratelimit
architecture supplied by pr_err_ratelimited doesn't do enough to prevent
kmsg becoming completely overwhelmed with their messages and pushing
other salient information out of the circular buffer. In one case, I saw
over 80% of kmsg being filled with these messages, and the default kmsg
buffer being completely filled less than 5 minutes after boot(!).
Make things much less aggressive, while still achieving the original
goal of fiter_write(). Operators will still get warnings that MSRs are
being manipulated from userspace, but they won't have other also
potentially useful messages pushed out of the kmsg buffer.
Of course, one can boot with `allow_writes=1` to avoid these messages at
all, but that then has the downfall that one doesn't get _any_
notification at all about these problems in the first place, and so is
much less likely to forget to fix it. One might rather it was less
binary: it was still logged, just less often, so that application
developers _do_ have the incentive to improve their current methods,
without us having to push other useful stuff out of the kmsg buffer.
This one example isn't the point, of course: I'm sure there are plenty
of other non-ideal-but-pragmatic cases where people are writing to MSRs
from userspace right now, and it will take time for those people to find
other solutions.
Overall, keep the intent of the original patch, while mitigating its
sometimes heavy effects on kmsg composition.
Signed-off-by: Chris Down <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/msr.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
index 49dcfb85e773..eaf375245549 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
@@ -80,18 +80,30 @@ static ssize_t msr_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
static int filter_write(u32 reg)
{
+ /*
+ * MSRs writes usually happen all at once, and can easily saturate kmsg.
+ * Only allow 1 MSR message every 30 seconds.
+ *
+ * It's possible to be smarter here and do it (for example) per-MSR, but
+ * it would certainly be more complex, and this is enough at least to
+ * avoid saturating the ring buffer.
+ */
+ static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(fw_rs, 30 * HZ, 1);
+
switch (allow_writes) {
case MSR_WRITES_ON: return 0;
case MSR_WRITES_OFF: return -EPERM;
default: break;
}
+ if (!__ratelimit(&fw_rs))
+ return 0;
+
if (reg == MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS)
return 0;
- pr_err_ratelimited("Write to unrecognized MSR 0x%x by %s\n"
- "Please report to [email protected]\n",
- reg, current->comm);
+ pr_err("Write to unrecognized MSR 0x%x by %s\n"
+ "Please report to [email protected]\n", reg, current->comm);
return 0;
}
--
2.28.0