2016-10-30 01:32:44

by Eric Wheeler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PULL] bcache: multiple updates

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Jens Axboe wrote:

> On 10/27/2016 05:27 PM, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > Please pull this v4.9-rc2 based series of bcache updates for v4.9-rc3:
> > (You may disregard the previous -rc1-based request.)
> >
> > git pull https://bitbucket.org/ewheelerinc/linux.git
> > v4.9-rc2-bcache-updates
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > --
> > Eric Wheeler
> >
> > ]# git log --oneline v4.9-rc2..HEAD
> > bd532a6 bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device
> > 3312845 bcache: Make gc wakeup sane, remove set_task_state()
> > 6bb7f1e bcache: update bio->bi_opf bypass/writeback REQ_ flag hints
> > 3d58a09 bcache: documentation for ioprio cache hinting
> > 2e8884b bcache: introduce per-process ioprio-based bypass/writeback hints
>
> How many of these are applicable to 4.9-rc3? I took a quick look at
> them, and some of them look like they should go into the 4.10 branch
> instead. We're after the merge window, so only strict fixes. Cleanups
> and no features, no go.

3312845 might need to be in 4.9. Not sure, kent asked me to pick it up in
my next pull request. 4.10 is fine for the rest.

Kent, Davidlohr, does 3312845 need to land in 4.9 for some reason?

See this thread:
Re: ciao set_task_state() (was Re: [PATCH -v4 6/8] locking/mutex: Restructure wait loop)
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2550193


--
Eric Wheeler



>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>
>


2016-10-30 03:44:22

by Davidlohr Bueso

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PULL] bcache: multiple updates

On Sat, 29 Oct 2016, Eric Wheeler wrote:

>Kent, Davidlohr, does 3312845 need to land in 4.9 for some reason?

No, not particularly. I can do my stuff whenever this is ends up being merged.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

2016-10-30 14:00:57

by Kent Overstreet

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PULL] bcache: multiple updates

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 06:32:38PM -0700, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > On 10/27/2016 05:27 PM, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > > Hi Jens,
> > >
> > > Please pull this v4.9-rc2 based series of bcache updates for v4.9-rc3:
> > > (You may disregard the previous -rc1-based request.)
> > >
> > > git pull https://bitbucket.org/ewheelerinc/linux.git
> > > v4.9-rc2-bcache-updates
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eric Wheeler
> > >
> > > ]# git log --oneline v4.9-rc2..HEAD
> > > bd532a6 bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device
> > > 3312845 bcache: Make gc wakeup sane, remove set_task_state()
> > > 6bb7f1e bcache: update bio->bi_opf bypass/writeback REQ_ flag hints
> > > 3d58a09 bcache: documentation for ioprio cache hinting
> > > 2e8884b bcache: introduce per-process ioprio-based bypass/writeback hints
> >
> > How many of these are applicable to 4.9-rc3? I took a quick look at
> > them, and some of them look like they should go into the 4.10 branch
> > instead. We're after the merge window, so only strict fixes. Cleanups
> > and no features, no go.
>
> 3312845 might need to be in 4.9. Not sure, kent asked me to pick it up in
> my next pull request. 4.10 is fine for the rest.
>
> Kent, Davidlohr, does 3312845 need to land in 4.9 for some reason?

No, that can wait until 4.10.

2016-10-30 15:01:11

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PULL] bcache: multiple updates

On 10/30/2016 08:00 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 06:32:38PM -0700, Eric Wheeler wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/27/2016 05:27 PM, Eric Wheeler wrote:
>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>>
>>>> Please pull this v4.9-rc2 based series of bcache updates for v4.9-rc3:
>>>> (You may disregard the previous -rc1-based request.)
>>>>
>>>> git pull https://bitbucket.org/ewheelerinc/linux.git
>>>> v4.9-rc2-bcache-updates
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Eric Wheeler
>>>>
>>>> ]# git log --oneline v4.9-rc2..HEAD
>>>> bd532a6 bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device
>>>> 3312845 bcache: Make gc wakeup sane, remove set_task_state()
>>>> 6bb7f1e bcache: update bio->bi_opf bypass/writeback REQ_ flag hints
>>>> 3d58a09 bcache: documentation for ioprio cache hinting
>>>> 2e8884b bcache: introduce per-process ioprio-based bypass/writeback hints
>>>
>>> How many of these are applicable to 4.9-rc3? I took a quick look at
>>> them, and some of them look like they should go into the 4.10 branch
>>> instead. We're after the merge window, so only strict fixes. Cleanups
>>> and no features, no go.
>>
>> 3312845 might need to be in 4.9. Not sure, kent asked me to pick it up in
>> my next pull request. 4.10 is fine for the rest.
>>
>> Kent, Davidlohr, does 3312845 need to land in 4.9 for some reason?
>
> No, that can wait until 4.10.

Great, that's what it looked like.

Eric, three things. The first is that you based this branch as if it was
going into 4.9, which means if I pull it into my 4.10 branch, I get a
ton of extra stuff that has been added to master since. Not a huge
problem, I can just generate the patches and apply them.

Secondly, you are depending on REQ_THROTTLED, which in the 4.10 series,
has been modified:

commit 8d2bbd4c8236e9e38e6b36ac9e2c54fdcfe5b335
Author: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Oct 20 15:12:12 2016 +0200

block: replace REQ_THROTTLED with a bio flag

And lastly, would you mind using the regular git request-pull to
generate your pull requests? It's what everybody else is using, and
honestly I think it's a lot more readable than the oneline thing you are
doing.

Please resend the series against for-4.10/block and we can get it
applied, thanks.

--
Jens Axboe

2016-11-01 02:36:02

by Eric Wheeler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PULL] bcache: multiple updates

On Sun, 30 Oct 2016, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/30/2016 08:00 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 06:32:38PM -0700, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 10/27/2016 05:27 PM, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > > > > Hi Jens,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please pull this v4.9-rc2 based series of bcache updates for v4.9-rc3:
> > > > > (You may disregard the previous -rc1-based request.)
> > > > >
> > > > > git pull https://bitbucket.org/ewheelerinc/linux.git
> > > > > v4.9-rc2-bcache-updates
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you!
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Eric Wheeler
> > > > >
> > > > > ]# git log --oneline v4.9-rc2..HEAD
> > > > > bd532a6 bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device
> > > > > 3312845 bcache: Make gc wakeup sane, remove set_task_state()
> > > > > 6bb7f1e bcache: update bio->bi_opf bypass/writeback REQ_ flag hints
> > > > > 3d58a09 bcache: documentation for ioprio cache hinting
> > > > > 2e8884b bcache: introduce per-process ioprio-based bypass/writeback
> > > > > hints
> > > >
> > > > How many of these are applicable to 4.9-rc3? I took a quick look at
> > > > them, and some of them look like they should go into the 4.10 branch
> > > > instead. We're after the merge window, so only strict fixes. Cleanups
> > > > and no features, no go.
> > >
> > > 3312845 might need to be in 4.9. Not sure, kent asked me to pick it up in
> > > my next pull request. 4.10 is fine for the rest.
> > >
> > > Kent, Davidlohr, does 3312845 need to land in 4.9 for some reason?
> >
> > No, that can wait until 4.10.
>
> Great, that's what it looked like.
>
> Eric, three things. The first is that you based this branch as if it was
> going into 4.9, which means if I pull it into my 4.10 branch, I get a
> ton of extra stuff that has been added to master since. Not a huge
> problem, I can just generate the patches and apply them.
>
> Secondly, you are depending on REQ_THROTTLED, which in the 4.10 series,
> has been modified:
>
> commit 8d2bbd4c8236e9e38e6b36ac9e2c54fdcfe5b335
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu Oct 20 15:12:12 2016 +0200
>
> block: replace REQ_THROTTLED with a bio flag
>
> And lastly, would you mind using the regular git request-pull to
> generate your pull requests? It's what everybody else is using, and
> honestly I think it's a lot more readable than the oneline thing you are
> doing.
>
> Please resend the series against for-4.10/block and we can get it
> applied, thanks.

Will do, thanks!

-Eric


--
Eric Wheeler


>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>
>

2016-12-06 19:47:48

by Eric Wheeler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PULL] bcache: based on for-4.10/block, multiple updates

Hello Jens,

Please pull for 4.10:

Thank you!

This pull request is based on the git.kernel.dk for-4.10/block branch:

The following changes since commit 333ba053d145d6f9152f6b0311a345b876f0fed1:

lightnvm: transform target get/set bad block (2016-11-29 12:12:51 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

https://bitbucket.org/ewheelerinc/linux.git for-4.10-block-bcache-updates

for you to fetch changes up to 951c0a8cc489aca1c68d80e5aaa576cd7e511191:

bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device (2016-12-06 10:13:24 -0800)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Wheeler (4):
bcache: introduce per-process ioprio-based bypass/writeback hints
bcache: documentation for ioprio cache hinting
bcache: update bio->bi_opf bypass/writeback REQ_ flag hints
bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device

Kent Overstreet (1):
bcache: Make gc wakeup sane, remove set_task_state()

Documentation/bcache.txt | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 7 ++--
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 39 +++++++++++----------
drivers/md/bcache/btree.h | 3 +-
drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 31 +++++++++++++++--
drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 7 +++-
drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 8 +++++
drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h | 27 ++++++++++++++-
9 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

2016-12-15 01:50:24

by Eric Wheeler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PULL] bcache: based on for-4.10/block, multiple updates

Hi Jens,

I know you're busy, so when you get a moment:

I've not yet seen your ack/nack on this yet and I want to make sure it
gets in before the merge window closes for v4.10. I rebased it on
for-4.10/block as you asked so its tested and ready to go as of 12/6
unless you see something that I've missed.

Thanks!

-Eric

--
Eric Wheeler

On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, Eric Wheeler wrote:

> Hello Jens,
>
> Please pull for 4.10:
>
> Thank you!
>
> This pull request is based on the git.kernel.dk for-4.10/block branch:
>
> The following changes since commit 333ba053d145d6f9152f6b0311a345b876f0fed1:
>
> lightnvm: transform target get/set bad block (2016-11-29 12:12:51 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/ewheelerinc/linux.git for-4.10-block-bcache-updates
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 951c0a8cc489aca1c68d80e5aaa576cd7e511191:
>
> bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device (2016-12-06 10:13:24 -0800)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Eric Wheeler (4):
> bcache: introduce per-process ioprio-based bypass/writeback hints
> bcache: documentation for ioprio cache hinting
> bcache: update bio->bi_opf bypass/writeback REQ_ flag hints
> bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device
>
> Kent Overstreet (1):
> bcache: Make gc wakeup sane, remove set_task_state()
>
> Documentation/bcache.txt | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 7 ++--
> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 39 +++++++++++----------
> drivers/md/bcache/btree.h | 3 +-
> drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 31 +++++++++++++++--
> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 7 +++-
> drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 8 +++++
> drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h | 27 ++++++++++++++-
> 9 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

2016-12-15 04:47:29

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PULL] bcache: based on for-4.10/block, multiple updates

On 12/14/2016 06:50 PM, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> I know you're busy, so when you get a moment:
>
> I've not yet seen your ack/nack on this yet and I want to make sure it
> gets in before the merge window closes for v4.10. I rebased it on
> for-4.10/block as you asked so its tested and ready to go as of 12/6
> unless you see something that I've missed.

Pulled for 4.10, sorry about the delay.

--
Jens Axboe