My earlier fix for read_persistent_clock() neglected to cover
m68328_hwclk(). Correct this oversight.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <[email protected]>
---
Greg, the read_persistent_clock() change has already been queued
by Geert. Should this patch be pushed together with that one
(presuming your ack)? Sorry for the inconvenience.
---
arch/m68k/68000/timers.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/68000/timers.c b/arch/m68k/68000/timers.c
index 252455bce144..71ddb4c98726 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/68000/timers.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/68000/timers.c
@@ -125,7 +125,9 @@ int m68328_hwclk(int set, struct rtc_time *t)
{
if (!set) {
long now = RTCTIME;
- t->tm_year = t->tm_mon = t->tm_mday = 1;
+ t->tm_year = 1;
+ t->tm_mon = 0;
+ t->tm_mday = 1;
t->tm_hour = (now >> 24) % 24;
t->tm_min = (now >> 16) % 60;
t->tm_sec = now % 60;
--
2.16.1
Hi Finn,
On 27/04/18 11:12, Finn Thain wrote:
> My earlier fix for read_persistent_clock() neglected to cover
> m68328_hwclk(). Correct this oversight.
>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <[email protected]>
> ---
> Greg, the read_persistent_clock() change has already been queued
> by Geert. Should this patch be pushed together with that one
> (presuming your ack)? Sorry for the inconvenience.
If Geert is happy to add it to his tree that would seem to make sense.
Otherwise I can take it via the m68knommu tree. Either way:
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <[email protected]>
Regards
Greg
> ---
> arch/m68k/68000/timers.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/68000/timers.c b/arch/m68k/68000/timers.c
> index 252455bce144..71ddb4c98726 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/68000/timers.c
> +++ b/arch/m68k/68000/timers.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,9 @@ int m68328_hwclk(int set, struct rtc_time *t)
> {
> if (!set) {
> long now = RTCTIME;
> - t->tm_year = t->tm_mon = t->tm_mday = 1;
> + t->tm_year = 1;
> + t->tm_mon = 0;
> + t->tm_mday = 1;
> t->tm_hour = (now >> 24) % 24;
> t->tm_min = (now >> 16) % 60;
> t->tm_sec = now % 60;
>
Hi Greg, Finn,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:33 AM, Greg Ungerer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 27/04/18 11:12, Finn Thain wrote:
>> My earlier fix for read_persistent_clock() neglected to cover
>> m68328_hwclk(). Correct this oversight.
>>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Greg, the read_persistent_clock() change has already been queued
>> by Geert. Should this patch be pushed together with that one
>> (presuming your ack)? Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> If Geert is happy to add it to his tree that would seem to make sense.
> Otherwise I can take it via the m68knommu tree. Either way:
>
> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <[email protected]>
I'm reconsidering.
I'll apply it to my tree, and fold it into the original fix for v4.18.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds