2023-03-02 02:19:55

by Jammy Huang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm/ast: Fix ARM compatibility

ARM architecture only has 'memory', so all devices are accessed by MMIO.

Signed-off-by: Jammy Huang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c | 17 +----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
index 794ffd4a29c5..f86d01e9f024 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
@@ -424,22 +424,7 @@ struct ast_device *ast_device_create(const struct drm_driver *drv,
if (!ast->regs)
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);

- /*
- * If we don't have IO space at all, use MMIO now and
- * assume the chip has MMIO enabled by default (rev 0x20
- * and higher).
- */
- if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, 2) & IORESOURCE_IO)) {
- drm_info(dev, "platform has no IO space, trying MMIO\n");
- ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
- }
-
- /* "map" IO regs if the above hasn't done so already */
- if (!ast->ioregs) {
- ast->ioregs = pcim_iomap(pdev, 2, 0);
- if (!ast->ioregs)
- return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
- }
+ ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;

ast_detect_chip(dev, &need_post);


base-commit: 254986e324add8a30d0019c6da59f81adc8b565f
--
2.25.1



2023-04-07 02:13:57

by Jammy Huang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ast: Fix ARM compatibility

Hi Thomas,

Could you help review this patch??

We met some problem on nvidia's ARM platfrom and need this patch to fix it.

On 2023/3/2 上午 10:19, Jammy Huang wrote:
> ARM architecture only has 'memory', so all devices are accessed by MMIO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jammy Huang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c | 17 +----------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
> index 794ffd4a29c5..f86d01e9f024 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
> @@ -424,22 +424,7 @@ struct ast_device *ast_device_create(const struct drm_driver *drv,
> if (!ast->regs)
> return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>
> - /*
> - * If we don't have IO space at all, use MMIO now and
> - * assume the chip has MMIO enabled by default (rev 0x20
> - * and higher).
> - */
> - if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, 2) & IORESOURCE_IO)) {
> - drm_info(dev, "platform has no IO space, trying MMIO\n");
> - ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
> - }
> -
> - /* "map" IO regs if the above hasn't done so already */
> - if (!ast->ioregs) {
> - ast->ioregs = pcim_iomap(pdev, 2, 0);
> - if (!ast->ioregs)
> - return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> - }
> + ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
>
> ast_detect_chip(dev, &need_post);
>
>
> base-commit: 254986e324add8a30d0019c6da59f81adc8b565f

--
Best Regards
Jammy

2023-04-17 12:02:32

by Thomas Zimmermann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ast: Fix ARM compatibility

Hi

Am 07.04.23 um 04:09 schrieb Jammy Huang:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Could you help review this patch??
>
> We met some problem on nvidia's ARM platfrom and need this patch to fix it.
>
> On 2023/3/2 上午 10:19, Jammy Huang wrote:
>> ARM architecture only has 'memory', so all devices are accessed by MMIO.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Huang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c | 17 +----------------
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>> index 794ffd4a29c5..f86d01e9f024 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>> @@ -424,22 +424,7 @@ struct ast_device *ast_device_create(const struct
>> drm_driver *drv,
>>       if (!ast->regs)
>>           return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>> -    /*
>> -     * If we don't have IO space at all, use MMIO now and
>> -     * assume the chip has MMIO enabled by default (rev 0x20
>> -     * and higher).
>> -     */
>> -    if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, 2) & IORESOURCE_IO)) {
>> -        drm_info(dev, "platform has no IO space, trying MMIO\n");
>> -        ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    /* "map" IO regs if the above hasn't done so already */
>> -    if (!ast->ioregs) {
>> -        ast->ioregs = pcim_iomap(pdev, 2, 0);

What happens on systems that use this branch?

Best regards
Thomas

>> -        if (!ast->ioregs)
>> -            return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>> -    }
>> +    ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
>>       ast_detect_chip(dev, &need_post);
>>
>> base-commit: 254986e324add8a30d0019c6da59f81adc8b565f
>

--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev


Attachments:
OpenPGP_signature (855.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2023-04-18 07:32:14

by Thomas Zimmermann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ast: Fix ARM compatibility

Hi

Am 18.04.23 um 03:23 schrieb Jammy Huang:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The Intel(x86) CPUs have a separate address space for "IO", but the ARM
> architecture only has "memory", so all IO devices are accessed as if
> they were memory. Which means ARM does not support isolated IO. Here is
> a related discussion on ARM's forum.
>
> https://community.arm.com/support-forums/f/architectures-and-processors-forum/52046/how-to-read-write-an-i-o-port-in-aarch64
>
> Thus, we want to adapt MMIO only after this patch.

What I mean is that there's a comment that says "assume the chip has
MMIO enabled by default (rev 0x20 and higher)". We also support revs
before 0x20. What happens to them?

Best regards
Thomas

>
> On 2023/4/17 下午 07:51, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 07.04.23 um 04:09 schrieb Jammy Huang:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> Could you help review this patch??
>>>
>>> We met some problem on nvidia's ARM platfrom and need this patch to
>>> fix it.
>>>
>>> On 2023/3/2 上午 10:19, Jammy Huang wrote:
>>>> ARM architecture only has 'memory', so all devices are accessed by
>>>> MMIO.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Huang <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c | 17 +----------------
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>> index 794ffd4a29c5..f86d01e9f024 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>> @@ -424,22 +424,7 @@ struct ast_device *ast_device_create(const
>>>> struct drm_driver *drv,
>>>>       if (!ast->regs)
>>>>           return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>>>> -    /*
>>>> -     * If we don't have IO space at all, use MMIO now and
>>>> -     * assume the chip has MMIO enabled by default (rev 0x20
>>>> -     * and higher).
>>>> -     */
>>>> -    if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, 2) & IORESOURCE_IO)) {
>>>> -        drm_info(dev, "platform has no IO space, trying MMIO\n");
>>>> -        ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
>>>> -    }
>>>> -
>>>> -    /* "map" IO regs if the above hasn't done so already */
>>>> -    if (!ast->ioregs) {
>>>> -        ast->ioregs = pcim_iomap(pdev, 2, 0);
>>
>> What happens on systems that use this branch?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>>> -        if (!ast->ioregs)
>>>> -            return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>>>> -    }
>>>> +    ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
>>>>       ast_detect_chip(dev, &need_post);
>>>>
>>>> base-commit: 254986e324add8a30d0019c6da59f81adc8b565f
>>>
>>
> --
> Best Regards
> Jammy
>

--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev


Attachments:
OpenPGP_signature (855.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2023-04-18 07:59:46

by Jammy Huang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ast: Fix ARM compatibility

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for you reminder. The comment you mentioned is added in 2014 for
AST2400 rev 0x20, which means MMIO is not enable by default before that
revision. I will send another patch to handle it.


On 2023/4/18 下午 03:24, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.04.23 um 03:23 schrieb Jammy Huang:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> The Intel(x86) CPUs have a separate address space for "IO", but the
>> ARM architecture only has "memory", so all IO devices are accessed as
>> if they were memory. Which means ARM does not support isolated IO.
>> Here is a related discussion on ARM's forum.
>>
>> https://community.arm.com/support-forums/f/architectures-and-processors-forum/52046/how-to-read-write-an-i-o-port-in-aarch64
>>
>>
>> Thus, we want to adapt MMIO only after this patch.
>
> What I mean is that there's a comment that says "assume the chip has
> MMIO enabled by default (rev 0x20 and higher)". We also support revs
> before 0x20. What happens to them?
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>>
>> On 2023/4/17 下午 07:51, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 07.04.23 um 04:09 schrieb Jammy Huang:
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>
>>>> Could you help review this patch??
>>>>
>>>> We met some problem on nvidia's ARM platfrom and need this patch to
>>>> fix it.
>>>>
>>>> On 2023/3/2 上午 10:19, Jammy Huang wrote:
>>>>> ARM architecture only has 'memory', so all devices are accessed by
>>>>> MMIO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Huang <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c | 17 +----------------
>>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>>> index 794ffd4a29c5..f86d01e9f024 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c
>>>>> @@ -424,22 +424,7 @@ struct ast_device *ast_device_create(const
>>>>> struct drm_driver *drv,
>>>>>       if (!ast->regs)
>>>>>           return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>>>>> -    /*
>>>>> -     * If we don't have IO space at all, use MMIO now and
>>>>> -     * assume the chip has MMIO enabled by default (rev 0x20
>>>>> -     * and higher).
>>>>> -     */
>>>>> -    if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, 2) & IORESOURCE_IO)) {
>>>>> -        drm_info(dev, "platform has no IO space, trying MMIO\n");
>>>>> -        ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
>>>>> -    }
>>>>> -
>>>>> -    /* "map" IO regs if the above hasn't done so already */
>>>>> -    if (!ast->ioregs) {
>>>>> -        ast->ioregs = pcim_iomap(pdev, 2, 0);
>>>
>>> What happens on systems that use this branch?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>>> -        if (!ast->ioregs)
>>>>> -            return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>>>>> -    }
>>>>> +    ast->ioregs = ast->regs + AST_IO_MM_OFFSET;
>>>>>       ast_detect_chip(dev, &need_post);
>>>>>
>>>>> base-commit: 254986e324add8a30d0019c6da59f81adc8b565f
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Jammy
>>
>
--
Best Regards
Jammy