2018-07-02 18:12:32

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drbd: mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Warning level 2 was used in this case: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
index be9450f..a36a307 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
@@ -2790,6 +2790,7 @@ static int receive_DataRequest(struct drbd_connection *connection, struct packet
then we would do something smarter here than reading
the block... */
peer_req->flags |= EE_RS_THIN_REQ;
+ /* fall through */
case P_RS_DATA_REQUEST:
peer_req->w.cb = w_e_end_rsdata_req;
fault_type = DRBD_FAULT_RS_RD;
@@ -2968,6 +2969,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
/* Else fall through to one of the other strategies... */
drbd_warn(device, "Discard younger/older primary did not find a decision\n"
"Using discard-least-changes instead\n");
+ /* fall through */
case ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG:
if (ch_peer == 0 && ch_self == 0) {
rv = test_bit(RESOLVE_CONFLICTS, &peer_device->connection->flags)
@@ -2979,6 +2981,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device) __must_hold
}
if (after_sb_0p == ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG)
break;
+ /* else: fall through */
case ASB_DISCARD_LEAST_CHG:
if (ch_self < ch_peer)
rv = -1;
--
2.7.4



2018-07-02 21:12:18

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drbd: mark expected switch fall-throughs

On 7/2/18 11:49 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Warning level 2 was used in this case: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2

Applied, thanks.

--
Jens Axboe