This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.10.100-rc1
Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <[email protected]>
KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++
crypto/algapi.c | 1 +
crypto/api.c | 1 -
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <[email protected]>
commit 2c212e1baedcd782b2535a3f86bc491977677c0e upstream.
Refuse SIDA memops on guests which are not protected.
For normal guests, the secure instruction data address designation,
which determines the location we access, is not under control of KVM.
Fixes: 19e122776886 (KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer)
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -4654,6 +4654,8 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_sida_op(struc
return -EINVAL;
if (mop->size + mop->sida_offset > sida_size(vcpu->arch.sie_block))
return -E2BIG;
+ if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+ return -EINVAL;
switch (mop->op) {
case KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ:
From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
commit c6ce9c5831cae515d375a01b97ae1778689acf19 upstream.
The soft dependency on cryptomgr is only needed in algapi because
if algapi isn't present then no algorithms can be loaded. This
also fixes the case where api is built-in but algapi is built as
a module as the soft dependency would otherwise get lost.
Fixes: 8ab23d547f65 ("crypto: api - Add softdep on cryptomgr")
Reported-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
crypto/algapi.c | 1 +
crypto/api.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/crypto/algapi.c
+++ b/crypto/algapi.c
@@ -1295,3 +1295,4 @@ module_exit(crypto_algapi_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic algorithms API");
+MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");
--- a/crypto/api.c
+++ b/crypto/api.c
@@ -603,4 +603,3 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_req_done);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic core API");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still
hit the gmp.h compilation issue):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.100-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: f1b074cc52b4cb5f2f78985508ae344e6f066252
* git describe: v5.10.98-79-gf1b074cc52b4
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.98-79-gf1b074cc52b4
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 76874, pass: 66765, fail: 223, skip: 9288, xfail: 598
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/734
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/738
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
--
Regards
Sudip
On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted 5.10.100-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Slade