2018-08-06 05:13:17

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:

arch/x86/include/asm/trace/hyperv.h

between commit:

58ec5e9c9044 ("x86/hyper-v: Trace PV IPI send")

from the tip tree and commit:

47c054685621 ("X86/Hyper-V: Add hyperv_nested_flush_guest_mapping ftrace support")

from the kvm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/x86/include/asm/trace/hyperv.h
index 9c0d4b588e3f,e1ffe61de8d6..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/hyperv.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/hyperv.h
@@@ -28,21 -28,20 +28,35 @@@ TRACE_EVENT(hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others
__entry->addr, __entry->end)
);

+TRACE_EVENT(hyperv_send_ipi_mask,
+ TP_PROTO(const struct cpumask *cpus,
+ int vector),
+ TP_ARGS(cpus, vector),
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned int, ncpus)
+ __field(int, vector)
+ ),
+ TP_fast_assign(__entry->ncpus = cpumask_weight(cpus);
+ __entry->vector = vector;
+ ),
+ TP_printk("ncpus %d vector %x",
+ __entry->ncpus, __entry->vector)
+ );
+
+ TRACE_EVENT(hyperv_nested_flush_guest_mapping,
+ TP_PROTO(u64 as, int ret),
+ TP_ARGS(as, ret),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(u64, as)
+ __field(int, ret)
+ ),
+ TP_fast_assign(__entry->as = as;
+ __entry->ret = ret;
+ ),
+ TP_printk("address space %llx ret %d", __entry->as, __entry->ret)
+ );
+
#endif /* CONFIG_HYPERV */

#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2018-08-06 06:28:35

by Tianyu Lan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

Hi Stephen:
Thanks for fix. I will discuss with maintainer about how to deal with
the issue.

On 8/6/2018 1:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/trace/hyperv.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 58ec5e9c9044 ("x86/hyper-v: Trace PV IPI send")
>
> from the tip tree and commit:
>
> 47c054685621 ("X86/Hyper-V: Add hyperv_nested_flush_guest_mapping ftrace support")
>
> from the kvm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>