On 8/31/2023 6:04 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 15:30, Praveenkumar I <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/31/2023 5:47 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 14:54, Praveenkumar I <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On 8/29/2023 7:49 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 16:59, Praveenkumar I <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> UNIPHY / Combo PHY used on various qualcomm SoC's are very similar to
>>>>>> ipq4019 PHY. Hence renaming this dt-binding to uniphy dt-binding and
>>>>>> can be used for other qualcomm SoCs which are having similar UNIPHY.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> .../phy/{qcom-usb-ipq4019-phy.yaml => qcom,uniphy.yaml} | 9 +++++++--
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/{qcom-usb-ipq4019-phy.yaml => qcom,uniphy.yaml} (78%)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-usb-ipq4019-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,uniphy.yaml
>>>>>> similarity index 78%
>>>>>> rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-usb-ipq4019-phy.yaml
>>>>>> rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,uniphy.yaml
>>>>>> index 09c614952fea..cbe2cc820009 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-usb-ipq4019-phy.yaml
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,uniphy.yaml
>>>>>> @@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
>>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>>>> %YAML 1.2
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> -$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/qcom-usb-ipq4019-phy.yaml#
>>>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/qcom,uniphy.yaml#
>>>>>> $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -title: Qualcom IPQ40xx Dakota HS/SS USB PHY
>>>>>> +title: Qualcomm UNIPHY
>>>>> We know that UNIPHY was a common design / IP block used for APQ8064
>>>>> SATA and MSM8974 DSI and HDMI PHYs. Is this the same design, or was
>>>>> the name reused by the Qualcomm for some other PHYs?
>>>>> Several latest generations have USB QMP PHYs which are called 'uni-phy'.
>>>> This PHY is build on top of QCA Uniphy 22ull. A combo PHY used between
>>>> USB Gen3 / PCIe Gen3 controller.
>>>> It is different from USB QMP PHYs.
>>> So we have now three different items called Qualcomm uniphy. Could you
>>> please add some distinctive name?
>> There is one more target called IPQ5018 which is also having similar USB
>> PHY built on top of
>> Uniphy 28nm LP. That also can leverage this upcoming IPQ5332 USB PHY
>> driver. Considering that,
>> given a common name 'uniphy'.
> Just to verify, do we mean the same thing, when speaking about the
> 28nm LP UNIPHY?
> I was referencing the apq8064 SATA and msm8974 HDMI / DSI PHYs. See [1] and [2].
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/544131/?series=118210&rev=2
> [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/544125/?series=118210&rev=2
No, this seems different from the PHY used on IPQ5018 / IPQ5332. PHY in
QualcommIPQ
targets requires minimal SW configuration for the bring up.
>> - Praveenkumar
>>>> - Praveenkumar
>>>>>> maintainers:
>>>>>> - Robert Marko <[email protected]>
>>>>>> + - Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +description:
>>>>>> + UNIPHY / COMBO PHY supports physical layer functionality for USB and PCIe on
>>>>>> + Qualcomm chipsets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> properties:
>>>>>> compatible:
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>>>
>>>
>
>