2023-09-19 20:53:56

by Stefan Roesch

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/ksm: Test case for prctl fork/exec workflow

This adds a new test case to the ksm functional tests to make sure that
the KSM setting is inherited by the child process when doing a
fork/exec.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +
.../selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c | 9 ++++
.../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
index 6a9fc5693145..9ab6aa402544 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64)
TEST_GEN_PROGS += soft-dirty
endif

+TEST_GEN_PROGS += ksm_fork_exec_child
+
ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32)
CAN_BUILD_X86_64 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_64bit_program.c)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..298439f0d55f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+int main()
+{
+ /* Test if KSM is enabled for the process. */
+ int ksm = prctl(68, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ exit(ksm == 1 ? 0 : 1);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
index 901e950f9138..4dc0bb522c07 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
@@ -479,6 +479,53 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void)
ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n");
}

+static void test_prctl_fork_exec(void)
+{
+ int ret, status;
+ pid_t child_pid;
+
+ ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE, 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ if (ret < 0 && errno == EINVAL) {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE not supported\n");
+ return;
+ } else if (ret) {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE=1 failed\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ child_pid = fork();
+ if (child_pid == -1) {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("fork() failed\n");
+ return;
+ } else if (child_pid == 0) {
+ char *filename = "./ksm_fork_exec_child";
+ char *argv_for_program[] = { filename, NULL };
+
+ execv(filename, argv_for_program);;
+ } else {
+ if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) > 0) {
+ if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
+ status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
+ if (status) {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("KSM not enabled\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("program didn't terminate normally\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("waitpid() failed\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n");
+}
+
static void test_prctl_unmerge(void)
{
const unsigned int size = 2 * MiB;
@@ -536,7 +583,7 @@ static void test_prot_none(void)

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
- unsigned int tests = 7;
+ unsigned int tests = 8;
int err;

#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
@@ -576,6 +623,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)

test_prctl();
test_prctl_fork();
+ test_prctl_fork_exec();
test_prctl_unmerge();

err = ksft_get_fail_cnt();
--
2.39.3


2023-09-20 14:28:38

by David Hildenbrand

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/ksm: Test case for prctl fork/exec workflow

On 19.09.23 22:51, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> This adds a new test case to the ksm functional tests to make sure that
> the KSM setting is inherited by the child process when doing a
> fork/exec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +
> .../selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c | 9 ++++
> .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> index 6a9fc5693145..9ab6aa402544 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64)
> TEST_GEN_PROGS += soft-dirty
> endif
>
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS += ksm_fork_exec_child

It's not a test itself, so it shouldn't be run when running all tests.
See below.

> +
> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
> CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32)
> CAN_BUILD_X86_64 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_64bit_program.c)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..298439f0d55f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +
> +int main()
> +{
> + /* Test if KSM is enabled for the process. */
> + int ksm = prctl(68, 0, 0, 0, 0);

Can we use the define from a header? (PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE)

I was wondering if we could simply exec() ourself (same binary), but
pass a special cmdline argument. Then you don't have to build a separate
binary.

Just special-case in main() on that argument and perform this check.

> + exit(ksm == 1 ? 0 : 1);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
> index 901e950f9138..4dc0bb522c07 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
> @@ -479,6 +479,53 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void)
> ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n");
> }
>
> +static void test_prctl_fork_exec(void)
> +{
> + int ret, status;
> + pid_t child_pid;
> +
> + ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__);
> +
> + ret = prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE, 1, 0, 0, 0);
> + if (ret < 0 && errno == EINVAL) {
> + ksft_test_result_skip("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE not supported\n");
> + return;
> + } else if (ret) {
> + ksft_test_result_fail("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE=1 failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + child_pid = fork();
> + if (child_pid == -1) {
> + ksft_test_result_skip("fork() failed\n");
> + return;
> + } else if (child_pid == 0) {
> + char *filename = "./ksm_fork_exec_child";
> + char *argv_for_program[] = { filename, NULL };
> +
> + execv(filename, argv_for_program);;

s/;;/;/

Add a return; so you can simplify the code below (no need for the "else")

> + } else {
> + if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) > 0) {
> + if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
> + status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
> + if (status) {
> + ksft_test_result_fail("KSM not enabled\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + } else {
> + ksft_test_result_fail("program didn't terminate normally\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + } else {
> + ksft_test_result_fail("waitpid() failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n");

It's probably the cleanest to disable PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE again when
returning form this function, so the other tests have a clean slate.


--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb

2023-09-21 00:08:10

by Stefan Roesch

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/ksm: Test case for prctl fork/exec workflow


David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> writes:

> On 19.09.23 22:51, Stefan Roesch wrote:
>> This adds a new test case to the ksm functional tests to make sure that
>> the KSM setting is inherited by the child process when doing a
>> fork/exec.
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +
>> .../selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c | 9 ++++
>> .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
>> index 6a9fc5693145..9ab6aa402544 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
>> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ ifneq ($(ARCH),arm64)
>> TEST_GEN_PROGS += soft-dirty
>> endif
>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS += ksm_fork_exec_child
>
> It's not a test itself, so it shouldn't be run when running all tests. See
> below.
>
>> +
>> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
>> CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32)
>> CAN_BUILD_X86_64 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh "$(CC)" ../x86/trivial_64bit_program.c)
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..298439f0d55f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_fork_exec_child.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>> +
>> +int main()
>> +{
>> + /* Test if KSM is enabled for the process. */
>> + int ksm = prctl(68, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>
> Can we use the define from a header? (PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE)
>

I changed it.

> I was wondering if we could simply exec() ourself (same binary), but pass a
> special cmdline argument. Then you don't have to build a separate binary.
>

I'm execing the same executable with an additional parameter.

> Just special-case in main() on that argument and perform this check.
>

I added a check in main and invoke a new function for the child.

>> + exit(ksm == 1 ? 0 : 1);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
>> index 901e950f9138..4dc0bb522c07 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
>> @@ -479,6 +479,53 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void)
>> ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n");
>> }
>> +static void test_prctl_fork_exec(void)
>> +{
>> + int ret, status;
>> + pid_t child_pid;
>> +
>> + ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__);
>> +
>> + ret = prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE, 1, 0, 0, 0);
>> + if (ret < 0 && errno == EINVAL) {
>> + ksft_test_result_skip("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE not supported\n");
>> + return;
>> + } else if (ret) {
>> + ksft_test_result_fail("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE=1 failed\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + child_pid = fork();
>> + if (child_pid == -1) {
>> + ksft_test_result_skip("fork() failed\n");
>> + return;
>> + } else if (child_pid == 0) {
>> + char *filename = "./ksm_fork_exec_child";
>> + char *argv_for_program[] = { filename, NULL };
>> +
>> + execv(filename, argv_for_program);;
>
> s/;;/;/
>

Fixed.

> Add a return; so you can simplify the code below (no need for the "else")
>

Done.


>> + } else {
>> + if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) > 0) {
>> + if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
>> + status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
>> + if (status) {
>> + ksft_test_result_fail("KSM not enabled\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + } else {
>> + ksft_test_result_fail("program didn't terminate normally\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + ksft_test_result_fail("waitpid() failed\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n");
>
> It's probably the cleanest to disable PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE again when returning
> form this function, so the other tests have a clean slate.

In the next version it is disabled at the end.