2023-02-03 14:05:33

by jerome Neanne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: tps65219: Add support for soft shutdown via sys-off API

Use new API for power-off mode support:
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/894511/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

sys-off API allows support of shutdown handler and restart handler.

Shutdown was not supported before that enhancement.
This is required for platform that are not using PSCI.

Test:
- restart:
# reboot
Default is cold reset:
# cat /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
Switch boot mode to warm reset:
# echo warm > /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
- power-off:
# halt

Tested on AM62-SP-SK board.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
index 0e402fda206b..c134f3f6e202 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
@@ -25,25 +25,34 @@ static int tps65219_cold_reset(struct tps65219 *tps)
TPS65219_MFP_COLD_RESET_I2C_CTRL_MASK);
}

-static int tps65219_restart(struct notifier_block *this,
- unsigned long reboot_mode, void *cmd)
+static int tps65219_soft_shutdown(struct tps65219 *tps)
{
- struct tps65219 *tps;
+ return regmap_update_bits(tps->regmap, TPS65219_REG_MFP_CTRL,
+ TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK,
+ TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK);
+}

- tps = container_of(this, struct tps65219, nb);
+static int tps65219_power_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
+{
+ tps65219_soft_shutdown(data->cb_data);
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}

+static int tps65219_restart(struct tps65219 *tps,
+ unsigned long reboot_mode)
+{
if (reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM)
tps65219_warm_reset(tps);
else
tps65219_cold_reset(tps);
-
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}

-static struct notifier_block pmic_rst_restart_nb = {
- .notifier_call = tps65219_restart,
- .priority = 200,
-};
+static int tps65219_restart_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
+{
+ tps65219_restart(data->cb_data, data->mode);
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}

static const struct resource tps65219_pwrbutton_resources[] = {
DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(TPS65219_INT_PB_FALLING_EDGE_DETECT, "falling"),
@@ -269,13 +278,27 @@ static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
}
}

- tps->nb = pmic_rst_restart_nb;
- ret = register_restart_handler(&tps->nb);
+ ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(tps->dev,
+ SYS_OFF_MODE_RESTART,
+ SYS_OFF_PRIO_HIGH,
+ tps65219_restart_handler,
+ tps);
+
if (ret) {
dev_err(tps->dev, "cannot register restart handler, %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}

+ ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(tps->dev,
+ SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF,
+ SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT,
+ tps65219_power_off_handler,
+ tps);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(tps->dev, "failed to register sys-off handler: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
return 0;
}

--
2.34.1



2023-03-01 16:07:38

by Lee Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65219: Add support for soft shutdown via sys-off API

On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, Jerome Neanne wrote:

> Use new API for power-off mode support:
> Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/894511/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
> sys-off API allows support of shutdown handler and restart handler.
>
> Shutdown was not supported before that enhancement.
> This is required for platform that are not using PSCI.
>
> Test:
> - restart:
> # reboot
> Default is cold reset:
> # cat /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
> Switch boot mode to warm reset:
> # echo warm > /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
> - power-off:
> # halt
>
> Tested on AM62-SP-SK board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>

A review from Andrew would be helpful here.

> ---
> drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
> index 0e402fda206b..c134f3f6e202 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
> @@ -25,25 +25,34 @@ static int tps65219_cold_reset(struct tps65219 *tps)
> TPS65219_MFP_COLD_RESET_I2C_CTRL_MASK);
> }
>
> -static int tps65219_restart(struct notifier_block *this,
> - unsigned long reboot_mode, void *cmd)
> +static int tps65219_soft_shutdown(struct tps65219 *tps)
> {
> - struct tps65219 *tps;
> + return regmap_update_bits(tps->regmap, TPS65219_REG_MFP_CTRL,
> + TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK,
> + TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK);
> +}
>
> - tps = container_of(this, struct tps65219, nb);
> +static int tps65219_power_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
> +{
> + tps65219_soft_shutdown(data->cb_data);
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
>
> +static int tps65219_restart(struct tps65219 *tps,
> + unsigned long reboot_mode)
> +{
> if (reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM)
> tps65219_warm_reset(tps);
> else
> tps65219_cold_reset(tps);
> -
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
>
> -static struct notifier_block pmic_rst_restart_nb = {
> - .notifier_call = tps65219_restart,
> - .priority = 200,
> -};
> +static int tps65219_restart_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
> +{
> + tps65219_restart(data->cb_data, data->mode);
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
>
> static const struct resource tps65219_pwrbutton_resources[] = {
> DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(TPS65219_INT_PB_FALLING_EDGE_DETECT, "falling"),
> @@ -269,13 +278,27 @@ static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> }
> }
>
> - tps->nb = pmic_rst_restart_nb;
> - ret = register_restart_handler(&tps->nb);
> + ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(tps->dev,
> + SYS_OFF_MODE_RESTART,
> + SYS_OFF_PRIO_HIGH,
> + tps65219_restart_handler,
> + tps);
> +
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(tps->dev, "cannot register restart handler, %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(tps->dev,
> + SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF,
> + SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT,
> + tps65219_power_off_handler,
> + tps);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(tps->dev, "failed to register sys-off handler: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

2023-03-01 16:37:32

by Andrew Davis

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65219: Add support for soft shutdown via sys-off API

On 3/1/23 10:07 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, Jerome Neanne wrote:
>
>> Use new API for power-off mode support:
>> Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/894511/
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>>
>> sys-off API allows support of shutdown handler and restart handler.
>>
>> Shutdown was not supported before that enhancement.
>> This is required for platform that are not using PSCI.
>>

Not sure what platform doesn't have PSCI off, since you tested on
AM62-SK I'm guessing you manually disabled the PSCI off for testing?

Anyway I don't see any huge issues with the code itself, small comment below.

>> Test:
>> - restart:
>> # reboot
>> Default is cold reset:
>> # cat /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
>> Switch boot mode to warm reset:
>> # echo warm > /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
>> - power-off:
>> # halt
>>
>> Tested on AM62-SP-SK board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <[email protected]>
>> Suggested-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
>
> A review from Andrew would be helpful here.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
>> index 0e402fda206b..c134f3f6e202 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
>> @@ -25,25 +25,34 @@ static int tps65219_cold_reset(struct tps65219 *tps)
>> TPS65219_MFP_COLD_RESET_I2C_CTRL_MASK);
>> }
>>
>> -static int tps65219_restart(struct notifier_block *this,
>> - unsigned long reboot_mode, void *cmd)
>> +static int tps65219_soft_shutdown(struct tps65219 *tps)
>> {
>> - struct tps65219 *tps;
>> + return regmap_update_bits(tps->regmap, TPS65219_REG_MFP_CTRL,
>> + TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK,
>> + TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK);
>> +}
>>
>> - tps = container_of(this, struct tps65219, nb);
>> +static int tps65219_power_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
>> +{
>> + tps65219_soft_shutdown(data->cb_data);
>> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +}
>>
>> +static int tps65219_restart(struct tps65219 *tps,
>> + unsigned long reboot_mode)
>> +{
>> if (reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM)
>> tps65219_warm_reset(tps);
>> else
>> tps65219_cold_reset(tps);
>> -
>> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> }
>>
>> -static struct notifier_block pmic_rst_restart_nb = {
>> - .notifier_call = tps65219_restart,
>> - .priority = 200,
>> -};
>> +static int tps65219_restart_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
>> +{
>> + tps65219_restart(data->cb_data, data->mode);
>> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +}
>>
>> static const struct resource tps65219_pwrbutton_resources[] = {
>> DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(TPS65219_INT_PB_FALLING_EDGE_DETECT, "falling"),
>> @@ -269,13 +278,27 @@ static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - tps->nb = pmic_rst_restart_nb;
>> - ret = register_restart_handler(&tps->nb);
>> + ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(tps->dev,
>> + SYS_OFF_MODE_RESTART,
>> + SYS_OFF_PRIO_HIGH,

Why not default prio? SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT

Then you can use this new helper devm_register_restart_handler()

>> + tps65219_restart_handler,
>> + tps);
>> +
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(tps->dev, "cannot register restart handler, %d\n", ret);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(tps->dev,
>> + SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF,
>> + SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT,
>> + tps65219_power_off_handler,
>> + tps);


devm_register_power_off_handler()?

Otherwise I see no major issues,

Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>

Andrew

>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(tps->dev, "failed to register sys-off handler: %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>

2023-03-03 05:36:53

by Vignesh Raghavendra

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65219: Add support for soft shutdown via sys-off API



On 03/02/23 19:31, Jerome Neanne wrote:
> Use new API for power-off mode support:
> Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/894511/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
> sys-off API allows support of shutdown handler and restart handler.
>
> Shutdown was not supported before that enhancement.
> This is required for platform that are not using PSCI.
>
> Test:
> - restart:
> # reboot
> Default is cold reset:
> # cat /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
> Switch boot mode to warm reset:
> # echo warm > /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
> - power-off:
> # halt
>
> Tested on AM62-SP-SK board.
>

There is no -SP-SK that I am aware of.. Do you mean -LP-SK?
[...]

--
Regards
Vignesh

2023-03-03 09:48:24

by jerome Neanne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65219: Add support for soft shutdown via sys-off API



On 03/03/2023 06:36, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>
>
> On 03/02/23 19:31, Jerome Neanne wrote:
>> Use new API for power-off mode support:
>> Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/894511/
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>>
>> sys-off API allows support of shutdown handler and restart handler.
>>
>> Shutdown was not supported before that enhancement.
>> This is required for platform that are not using PSCI.
>>
>> Test:
>> - restart:
>> # reboot
>> Default is cold reset:
>> # cat /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
>> Switch boot mode to warm reset:
>> # echo warm > /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
>> - power-off:
>> # halt
>>
>> Tested on AM62-SP-SK board.
>>
>
> There is no -SP-SK that I am aware of.. Do you mean -LP-SK?
You are right, this is a typo. It's LP-SK
> [...]
>

2023-03-03 15:12:52

by jerome Neanne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65219: Add support for soft shutdown via sys-off API



On 01/03/2023 17:35, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 3/1/23 10:07 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, Jerome Neanne wrote:
>>
>>> Use new API for power-off mode support:
>>> Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/894511/
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>>>
>>> sys-off API allows support of shutdown handler and restart handler.
>>>
>>> Shutdown was not supported before that enhancement.
>>> This is required for platform that are not using PSCI.
>>>
>
> Not sure what platform doesn't have PSCI off, since you tested on
> AM62-SK I'm guessing you manually disabled the PSCI off for testing?
>
> Anyway I don't see any huge issues with the code itself, small comment
> below.
>
>>> Test:
>>> - restart:
>>>    # reboot
>>>    Default is cold reset:
>>>    # cat /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
>>>    Switch boot mode to warm reset:
>>>    # echo warm > /sys/kernel/reboot/mode
>>> - power-off:
>>>    # halt
>>>
>>> Tested on AM62-SP-SK board.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <[email protected]>
>>> Suggested-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
>>
>> A review from Andrew would be helpful here.
>>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
>>> index 0e402fda206b..c134f3f6e202 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
>>> @@ -25,25 +25,34 @@ static int tps65219_cold_reset(struct tps65219 *tps)
>>>                     TPS65219_MFP_COLD_RESET_I2C_CTRL_MASK);
>>>   }
>>> -static int tps65219_restart(struct notifier_block *this,
>>> -                unsigned long reboot_mode, void *cmd)
>>> +static int tps65219_soft_shutdown(struct tps65219 *tps)
>>>   {
>>> -    struct tps65219 *tps;
>>> +    return regmap_update_bits(tps->regmap, TPS65219_REG_MFP_CTRL,
>>> +                  TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK,
>>> +                  TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK);
>>> +}
>>> -    tps = container_of(this, struct tps65219, nb);
>>> +static int tps65219_power_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
>>> +{
>>> +    tps65219_soft_shutdown(data->cb_data);
>>> +    return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>> +}
>>> +static int tps65219_restart(struct tps65219 *tps,
>>> +                unsigned long reboot_mode)
>>> +{
>>>       if (reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM)
>>>           tps65219_warm_reset(tps);
>>>       else
>>>           tps65219_cold_reset(tps);
>>> -
>>>       return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>   }
>>> -static struct notifier_block pmic_rst_restart_nb = {
>>> -    .notifier_call = tps65219_restart,
>>> -    .priority = 200,
>>> -};
>>> +static int tps65219_restart_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
>>> +{
>>> +    tps65219_restart(data->cb_data, data->mode);
>>> +    return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>> +}
>>>   static const struct resource tps65219_pwrbutton_resources[] = {
>>>       DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(TPS65219_INT_PB_FALLING_EDGE_DETECT,
>>> "falling"),
>>> @@ -269,13 +278,27 @@ static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client
>>> *client)
>>>           }
>>>       }
>>> -    tps->nb = pmic_rst_restart_nb;
>>> -    ret = register_restart_handler(&tps->nb);
>>> +    ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(tps->dev,
>>> +                        SYS_OFF_MODE_RESTART,
>>> +                        SYS_OFF_PRIO_HIGH,
>
> Why not default prio? SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT
I'm not completely clear about PRIO recommendations. Will follow your
suggestion.
>
> Then you can use this new helper devm_register_restart_handler()
Sure!
>
>>> +                        tps65219_restart_handler,
>>> +                        tps);
>>> +
>>>       if (ret) {
>>>           dev_err(tps->dev, "cannot register restart handler, %d\n",
>>> ret);
>>>           return ret;
>>>       }
>>> +    ret = devm_register_sys_off_handler(tps->dev,
>>> +                        SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF,
>>> +                        SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT,
>>> +                        tps65219_power_off_handler,
>>> +                        tps);
>
>
> devm_register_power_off_handler()?
>
Oh yes, right, this is solving the PRIO question by construction. This
is definitely a better option
> Otherwise I see no major issues,
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
>
> Andrew
>
>>> +    if (ret) {
>>> +        dev_err(tps->dev, "failed to register sys-off handler: %d\n",
>>> +            ret);
>>> +        return ret;
>>> +    }
>>>       return 0;
>>>   }
>>> --
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
>>