2023-03-27 14:49:08

by Bjorn Andersson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] rpmsg: glink: Consolidate TX_DATA and TX_DATA_CONT

Rather than duplicating most of the code for constructing the initial
TX_DATA and subsequent TX_DATA_CONT packets, roll them into a single
loop.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
---
drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 46 +++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
index 62634d020d13..082cf7f4888e 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
@@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
int ret;
unsigned long flags;
int chunk_size = len;
- int left_size = 0;
+ size_t offset = 0;

if (!glink->intentless) {
while (!intent) {
@@ -1343,49 +1343,29 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
iid = intent->id;
}

- if (wait && chunk_size > SZ_8K) {
- chunk_size = SZ_8K;
- left_size = len - chunk_size;
- }
- req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA);
- req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
- req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
- req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
- req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
-
- ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data, chunk_size, wait);
-
- /* Mark intent available if we failed */
- if (ret) {
- if (intent)
- intent->in_use = false;
- return ret;
- }
-
- while (left_size > 0) {
- data = (void *)((char *)data + chunk_size);
- chunk_size = left_size;
- if (chunk_size > SZ_8K)
+ while (offset < len) {
+ chunk_size = len - offset;
+ if (chunk_size > SZ_8K && (wait || offset > 0))
chunk_size = SZ_8K;
- left_size -= chunk_size;

- req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
+ req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(offset == 0 ? GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA : GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
- req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
+ req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(len - offset - chunk_size);

- ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data,
- chunk_size, wait);
-
- /* Mark intent available if we failed */
+ ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data + offset, chunk_size, wait);
if (ret) {
+ /* Mark intent available if we failed */
if (intent)
intent->in_use = false;
- break;
+ return ret;
}
+
+ offset += chunk_size;
}
- return ret;
+
+ return 0;
}

static int qcom_glink_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)
--
2.25.1


2023-04-07 22:21:50

by Chris Lew

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rpmsg: glink: Consolidate TX_DATA and TX_DATA_CONT



On 3/27/2023 7:41 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Rather than duplicating most of the code for constructing the initial
> TX_DATA and subsequent TX_DATA_CONT packets, roll them into a single
> loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 46 +++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> index 62634d020d13..082cf7f4888e 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> @@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
> int ret;
> unsigned long flags;
> int chunk_size = len;
> - int left_size = 0;
> + size_t offset = 0;
>
> if (!glink->intentless) {
> while (!intent) {
> @@ -1343,49 +1343,29 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
> iid = intent->id;
> }
>
> - if (wait && chunk_size > SZ_8K) {
> - chunk_size = SZ_8K;
> - left_size = len - chunk_size;
> - }
> - req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA);
> - req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
> - req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
> - req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
> - req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
> -
> - ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data, chunk_size, wait);
> -
> - /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> - if (ret) {
> - if (intent)
> - intent->in_use = false;
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - while (left_size > 0) {
> - data = (void *)((char *)data + chunk_size);
> - chunk_size = left_size;
> - if (chunk_size > SZ_8K)
> + while (offset < len) {
> + chunk_size = len - offset;
> + if (chunk_size > SZ_8K && (wait || offset > 0))

offset > 0 seems to be a new condition compared to the previous logic.
Are we adding this as a cached check because we know if offset is set
then fragmented sends are allowed?

I don't think wait would have changed during the loop, so I'm not sure
if offset > 0 is adding any extra value to the check.

> chunk_size = SZ_8K;
> - left_size -= chunk_size;
>
> - req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
> + req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(offset == 0 ? GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA : GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
> req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
> req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
> req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
> - req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
> + req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(len - offset - chunk_size);
>
> - ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data,
> - chunk_size, wait);
> -
> - /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> + ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data + offset, chunk_size, wait);
> if (ret) {
> + /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> if (intent)
> intent->in_use = false;
> - break;
> + return ret;
> }
> +
> + offset += chunk_size;
> }
> - return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int qcom_glink_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)

2023-04-12 16:51:25

by Bjorn Andersson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rpmsg: glink: Consolidate TX_DATA and TX_DATA_CONT

On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 03:10:45PM -0700, Chris Lew wrote:
>
>
> On 3/27/2023 7:41 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > Rather than duplicating most of the code for constructing the initial
> > TX_DATA and subsequent TX_DATA_CONT packets, roll them into a single
> > loop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 46 +++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> > index 62634d020d13..082cf7f4888e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> > @@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
> > int ret;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int chunk_size = len;
> > - int left_size = 0;
> > + size_t offset = 0;
> > if (!glink->intentless) {
> > while (!intent) {
> > @@ -1343,49 +1343,29 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
> > iid = intent->id;
> > }
> > - if (wait && chunk_size > SZ_8K) {
> > - chunk_size = SZ_8K;
> > - left_size = len - chunk_size;
> > - }
> > - req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA);
> > - req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
> > - req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
> > - req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
> > - req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
> > -
> > - ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data, chunk_size, wait);
> > -
> > - /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> > - if (ret) {
> > - if (intent)
> > - intent->in_use = false;
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
> > - while (left_size > 0) {
> > - data = (void *)((char *)data + chunk_size);
> > - chunk_size = left_size;
> > - if (chunk_size > SZ_8K)
> > + while (offset < len) {
> > + chunk_size = len - offset;
> > + if (chunk_size > SZ_8K && (wait || offset > 0))
>
> offset > 0 seems to be a new condition compared to the previous logic.
> Are we adding this as a cached check because we know if offset is set then
> fragmented sends are allowed?
>

You're right, I believe my intention was to retain the two inquiries of
the original code; for the first block, don't split it if we're not
waiting and for any subsequent blocks always split.

> I don't think wait would have changed during the loop, so I'm not sure if
> offset > 0 is adding any extra value to the check.
>

But you're totally right, offset > 0 would only occur if wait is set and
wait will not have changed for subsequent blocks.

So while capturing the original conditions, it seems superfluous.

Thanks,
Bjorn

> > chunk_size = SZ_8K;
> > - left_size -= chunk_size;
> > - req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
> > + req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(offset == 0 ? GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA : GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
> > req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
> > req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
> > req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
> > - req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
> > + req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(len - offset - chunk_size);
> > - ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data,
> > - chunk_size, wait);
> > -
> > - /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> > + ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data + offset, chunk_size, wait);
> > if (ret) {
> > + /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> > if (intent)
> > intent->in_use = false;
> > - break;
> > + return ret;
> > }
> > +
> > + offset += chunk_size;
> > }
> > - return ret;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> > static int qcom_glink_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)