Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
net/bridge/br_netlink_tunnel.c: In function '__vlan_tunnel_handle_range':
net/bridge/br_netlink_tunnel.c:271:26: error: implicit declaration of function 'br_vlan_can_enter_range'; did you mean 'br_vlan_valid_range'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
271 | if (v && curr_change && br_vlan_can_enter_range(v, *v_end)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| br_vlan_valid_range
Caused by commit
94339443686b ("net: bridge: notify on vlan tunnel changes done via the old api")
CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING is not set for this build.
I have reverted that commit for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On 13/07/2020 04:54, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/bridge/br_netlink_tunnel.c: In function '__vlan_tunnel_handle_range':
> net/bridge/br_netlink_tunnel.c:271:26: error: implicit declaration of function 'br_vlan_can_enter_range'; did you mean 'br_vlan_valid_range'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 271 | if (v && curr_change && br_vlan_can_enter_range(v, *v_end)) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | br_vlan_valid_range
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 94339443686b ("net: bridge: notify on vlan tunnel changes done via the old api")
>
> CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING is not set for this build.
>
> I have reverted that commit for today.
>
Oops, sorry that's my bad. I mixed br_netlink_tunnel with br_vlan_tunnel, the latter is compiled only
when bridge vlan filtering is defined.
Anyway, I'll post a fix ASAP.
Thanks.