This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.6.2-rc1
Georg Müller <[email protected]>
platform/x86: pmc_atom: Add Lex 2I385SW to critclk_systems DMI table
Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
vt: vt_ioctl: fix use-after-free in vt_in_use()
Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
vt: vt_ioctl: fix VT_DISALLOCATE freeing in-use virtual console
Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
vt: vt_ioctl: remove unnecessary console allocation checks
Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
vt: switch vt_dont_switch to bool
Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
vt: ioctl, switch VT_IS_IN_USE and VT_BUSY to inlines
Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
vt: selection, introduce vc_is_sel
Lanqing Liu <[email protected]>
serial: sprd: Fix a dereference warning
Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
mac80211: fix authentication with iwlwifi/mvm
Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
bpf: update jmp32 test cases to fix range bound deduction
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-
drivers/platform/x86/pmc_atom.c | 8 +++
drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c | 3 +-
drivers/tty/vt/selection.c | 5 ++
drivers/tty/vt/vt.c | 30 +++++++++--
drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 75 +++++++++++++++-------------
include/linux/selection.h | 4 +-
include/linux/vt_kern.h | 2 +-
net/mac80211/tx.c | 3 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c | 9 ++--
10 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
Good. You made 5.6.1 so quickly that I didn't have time to react and
say that it makes little sense without the 802.11 fix, but you're
obviously making 5.6.2 quickly, so..
That was just horrible timing. David's email to say "holup" came in
literally _one_ minute after I had sent the 5.6 announcement: my
timestamps for that unfortunate thing is "3:51 PM" for my 5.6
announcement, and the email where David says "Meanwhile, we have a
wireless regression, and I'll get the fix for that to you by the end
of today" has a timestamp of "3:52 PM"
(Ok, so me actually tagging the tree and pushing it out happened about
half an hour earlier, so it's not like it was quite that close, but I
found the timing of the almost-crossed emails to be funny/sad).
Linus
On 4/1/20 10:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:06:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
>>
>> Good. You made 5.6.1 so quickly that I didn't have time to react and
>> say that it makes little sense without the 802.11 fix, but you're
>> obviously making 5.6.2 quickly, so..
>
> Yeah, 5.6.1 had to go out fast, sorry I missed this patch. Luckily it
> seems that every distro vendor heard about it (or asked me about it)
> already, and have included it in their trees so the majority of users
> shouldn't hit this just yet.
>
> And, if this passes Guenter's test builds quickly (hint), I can push it
> out quickly as well :)
>
Running ... but you submitted 7 branches all in one go, so it will take
a while to complete. Results should be available sometime early in the
evening (PDT).
Guenter
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:06:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
>
> Good. You made 5.6.1 so quickly that I didn't have time to react and
> say that it makes little sense without the 802.11 fix, but you're
> obviously making 5.6.2 quickly, so..
Yeah, 5.6.1 had to go out fast, sorry I missed this patch. Luckily it
seems that every distro vendor heard about it (or asked me about it)
already, and have included it in their trees so the majority of users
shouldn't hit this just yet.
And, if this passes Guenter's test builds quickly (hint), I can push it
out quickly as well :)
thanks,
greg k-h
On 4/1/20 11:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:06:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
>>
>> Good. You made 5.6.1 so quickly that I didn't have time to react and
>> say that it makes little sense without the 802.11 fix, but you're
>> obviously making 5.6.2 quickly, so..
>
wifi issue I was seeing on my laptop with 5.6.0 is now resolved.
Thanks for pulling this in quickly.
thanks,
-- Shuah
On 4/1/20 9:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 428 pass: 428 fail: 0
Guenter
On 01/04/2020 17:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests are passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.6:
13 builds: 13 pass, 0 fail
24 boots: 24 pass, 0 fail
40 tests: 40 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.6.2-rc1-g6c8d51f98078
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 05:14:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 4/1/20 9:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
> > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 428 pass: 428 fail: 0
Wonderful, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 21:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.6.2-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.6.y
git commit: 6c8d51f98078987586685d72fd3d66b88f3f965a
git describe: v5.6.1-11-g6c8d51f98078
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.6-oe/build/v5.6.1-11-g6c8d51f98078
No regressions (compared to build v5.6.1)
No fixes (compared to build v5.6.1)
Ran 18887 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- nxp-ls2088
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
Test Suites
-----------
* build
* install-android-platform-tools-r2800
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* ltp-ipc-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 08:11:07AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 01/04/2020 17:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
> > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> All tests are passing for Tegra ...
>
> Test results for stable-v5.6:
> 13 builds: 13 pass, 0 fail
> 24 boots: 24 pass, 0 fail
> 40 tests: 40 pass, 0 fail
>
> Linux version: 5.6.2-rc1-g6c8d51f98078
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
Great, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:01:54PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 21:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
> > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Great, thanks for testing all of tehse and letting me know.
greg k-h