2024-04-08 13:21:13

by Jacobe Zang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Khadas VIM3/3L New TS050 support patch

Subject: [PATCH] drm/panel: add New TS050 Panel support

Hello all,

I have made some changes to the panel-khadas-ts050.c. Here is a brief overview of what has been done:

- Add dt-bindings in document.
- Add New TS050 Panel timing sequence.
- Make it compatible with the old TS050 panel.
- The only difference between them is the timing, so I change the node in overlay to identify the specific panel.
- Changes in DTS doesn't push, because preceding commits have not been merged.

The proposed changes have been successfully run on Khadas VIM3/3L.

Please find the patch attached/inline.

Jacobe Zang (2):
drm/panel: add New TS050 panel support
dt-bindings: panel-simple-dsi: add New Khadas TS050 panel bindings

drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-khadas-ts050.c | 1119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------------------
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple-dsi.yaml | 2 ++

---
Best Regards
Jacobe 갽???
Amazing Khadas, Always Amazes You!


Attachments:
0001-dt-bindings-panel-simple-dsi-add-New-Khadas-TS050-pa.patch (1.22 kB)
0001-dt-bindings-panel-simple-dsi-add-New-Khadas-TS050-pa.patch
0002-drm-panel-add-New-TS050-panel-support.patch (26.98 kB)
0002-drm-panel-add-New-TS050-panel-support.patch
Download all attachments

2024-04-08 13:23:23

by Neil Armstrong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Khadas VIM3/3L New TS050 support patch

Hi Jacobe,

On 08/04/2024 15:16, Jacobe Zang wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/panel: add New TS050 Panel support
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have made some changes to the panel-khadas-ts050.c. Here is a brief overview of what has been done:
>
> - Add dt-bindings in document.
> - Add New TS050 Panel timing sequence.
> - Make it compatible with the old TS050 panel.
> - The only difference between them is the timing, so I change the node in overlay to identify the specific panel.
> - Changes in DTS doesn't push, because preceding commits have not been merged.
>
> The proposed changes have been successfully run on Khadas VIM3/3L.
>
> Please find the patch attached/inline.

You should read https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html
and perhaps use a tool like b4 (https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/) to send your patches in text only,
you can follow https://www.marcusfolkesson.se/blog/use-b4-for-kernel-contributions/ for example.

I'm afraid this patchset will be rejected and not reviewed if sent in this format with patches as attachments.

Thanks,
Neil

>
> Jacobe Zang (2):
> drm/panel: add New TS050 panel support
> dt-bindings: panel-simple-dsi: add New Khadas TS050 panel bindings
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-khadas-ts050.c | 1119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------------------
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple-dsi.yaml | 2 ++
>
> ---
> Best Regards
> Jacobe 臧介皓
> Amazing Khadas, Always Amazes You!


2024-04-09 08:50:39

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Khadas VIM3/3L New TS050 support patch

On 08/04/2024 15:16, Jacobe Zang wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/panel: add New TS050 Panel support
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have made some changes to the panel-khadas-ts050.c. Here is a brief overview of what has been done:
>
> - Add dt-bindings in document.
> - Add New TS050 Panel timing sequence.
> - Make it compatible with the old TS050 panel.
> - The only difference between them is the timing, so I change the node in overlay to identify the specific panel.
> - Changes in DTS doesn't push, because preceding commits have not been merged.
>

I cannot review attachments, but anyway:

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow
the process allowing the patch to be tested.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.


Best regards,
Krzysztof