On 2023/08/16 19:16, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 05:34:43PM +0800, GONG, Ruiqi wrote:
>> From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <[email protected]>
>>
>> As suggested by Kees[1], replace the old-style 0-element array members
>> of multiple structs in ebtables.h with modern C99 flexible array.
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
>> Signed-off-by: GONG, Ruiqi <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> v2: designate to net-next; cc more netdev maintainers
>
> It's slightly unclear to me if this should be targeting
> net-next or nf-next. But regardless, it doesn't seem
> to apply cleanly to the main branch of either tree.
I find out that it's because this patch depends on a previous patch I've
just sent:
[v4] netfilter: ebtables: fix fortify warnings in size_entry_mwt()
Maybe I should make them two into a patch set? Otherwise if I adapt this
patch to net-next, it won't be applied either if the above patch is
applied ...
>
> Please consider resolving that and posting again,
> being sure to allow 24h before postings.
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>