2008-10-15 22:50:58

by OGAWA Hirofumi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH vfs-2.6 1/6] vfs: replace parent == dentry->d_parent by IS_ROOT()



Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
---

fs/dcache.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
fs/namei.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/dcache.c~dcache-cleanup-1 fs/dcache.c
--- vfs-2.6/fs/dcache.c~dcache-cleanup-1 2008-10-16 06:57:26.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/fs/dcache.c 2008-10-16 06:57:26.000000000 +0900
@@ -174,9 +174,12 @@ static struct dentry *d_kill(struct dent
dentry_stat.nr_dentry--; /* For d_free, below */
/*drops the locks, at that point nobody can reach this dentry */
dentry_iput(dentry);
- parent = dentry->d_parent;
+ if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
+ parent = NULL;
+ else
+ parent = dentry->d_parent;
d_free(dentry);
- return dentry == parent ? NULL : parent;
+ return parent;
}

/*
@@ -666,11 +669,12 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_sub
BUG();
}

- parent = dentry->d_parent;
- if (parent == dentry)
+ if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
parent = NULL;
- else
+ else {
+ parent = dentry->d_parent;
atomic_dec(&parent->d_count);
+ }

list_del(&dentry->d_u.d_child);
detached++;
@@ -1721,7 +1725,7 @@ static int d_isparent(struct dentry *p1,
{
struct dentry *p;

- for (p = p2; p->d_parent != p; p = p->d_parent) {
+ for (p = p2; !IS_ROOT(p); p = p->d_parent) {
if (p->d_parent == p1)
return 1;
}
@@ -2166,10 +2170,9 @@ int is_subdir(struct dentry * new_dentry
seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
for (;;) {
if (new_dentry != old_dentry) {
- struct dentry * parent = new_dentry->d_parent;
- if (parent == new_dentry)
+ if (IS_ROOT(new_dentry))
break;
- new_dentry = parent;
+ new_dentry = new_dentry->d_parent;
continue;
}
result = 1;
diff -puN fs/namei.c~dcache-cleanup-1 fs/namei.c
--- vfs-2.6/fs/namei.c~dcache-cleanup-1 2008-10-16 06:57:26.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/fs/namei.c 2008-10-16 06:57:26.000000000 +0900
@@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry

mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);

- for (p = p1; p->d_parent != p; p = p->d_parent) {
+ for (p = p1; !IS_ROOT(p); p = p->d_parent) {
if (p->d_parent == p2) {
mutex_lock_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
@@ -1462,7 +1462,7 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry
}
}

- for (p = p2; p->d_parent != p; p = p->d_parent) {
+ for (p = p2; !IS_ROOT(p); p = p->d_parent) {
if (p->d_parent == p1) {
mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
mutex_lock_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
_


2008-10-15 22:50:42

by OGAWA Hirofumi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH vfs-2.6 4/6] vfs: remove unnecessary fsnotify_d_instantiate()


This calls d_move(), so fsnotify_d_instantiate() is unnecessary like
rename path.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
---

fs/dcache.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN fs/dcache.c~dcache-cleanup-4 fs/dcache.c
--- vfs-2.6/fs/dcache.c~dcache-cleanup-4 2008-10-16 06:57:33.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/fs/dcache.c 2008-10-16 06:57:33.000000000 +0900
@@ -1210,7 +1210,6 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct ino
new = __d_find_alias(inode, 1);
if (new) {
BUG_ON(!(new->d_flags & DCACHE_DISCONNECTED));
- fsnotify_d_instantiate(new, inode);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
security_d_instantiate(new, inode);
d_rehash(dentry);
_

2008-10-15 22:51:28

by OGAWA Hirofumi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH vfs-2.6 5/6] vfs: remove LOOKUP_PARENT from non LOOKUP_PARENT lookup


lookup_hash() with LOOKUP_PARENT is bogus. And this prepares to add
new intent on those path.

The user of LOOKUP_PARENT intent is nfs only, and it checks whether
nd->flags has LOOKUP_CREATE or LOOKUP_OPEN, so the result is same.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
---

fs/namei.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/namei.c~dcache-remove-parent fs/namei.c
--- vfs-2.6/fs/namei.c~dcache-remove-parent 2008-10-16 06:57:35.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/fs/namei.c 2008-10-16 06:57:35.000000000 +0900
@@ -2170,16 +2170,19 @@ static long do_rmdir(int dfd, const char
return error;

switch(nd.last_type) {
- case LAST_DOTDOT:
- error = -ENOTEMPTY;
- goto exit1;
- case LAST_DOT:
- error = -EINVAL;
- goto exit1;
- case LAST_ROOT:
- error = -EBUSY;
- goto exit1;
+ case LAST_DOTDOT:
+ error = -ENOTEMPTY;
+ goto exit1;
+ case LAST_DOT:
+ error = -EINVAL;
+ goto exit1;
+ case LAST_ROOT:
+ error = -EBUSY;
+ goto exit1;
}
+
+ nd.flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
+
mutex_lock_nested(&nd.path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
dentry = lookup_hash(&nd);
error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
@@ -2257,6 +2260,9 @@ static long do_unlinkat(int dfd, const c
error = -EISDIR;
if (nd.last_type != LAST_NORM)
goto exit1;
+
+ nd.flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
+
mutex_lock_nested(&nd.path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
dentry = lookup_hash(&nd);
error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
@@ -2646,6 +2652,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_renameat(int olddfd,
if (newnd.last_type != LAST_NORM)
goto exit2;

+ oldnd.flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
+ newnd.flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
+
trap = lock_rename(new_dir, old_dir);

old_dentry = lookup_hash(&oldnd);
_

2008-10-15 22:51:43

by OGAWA Hirofumi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH vfs-2.6 2/6] vfs: add d_ancestor()



This adds d_ancestor() instead of d_isparent(), then use it.

If new_dentry == old_dentry, is_subdir() returns 1, looks strange.
"new_dentry == old_dentry" is not subdir obviously. But I'm not
checking callers for now, so this keeps current behavior.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
---

fs/dcache.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
fs/namei.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
include/linux/dcache.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/dcache.c~dcache-cleanup-2 fs/dcache.c
--- vfs-2.6/fs/dcache.c~dcache-cleanup-2 2008-10-16 06:57:29.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/fs/dcache.c 2008-10-16 06:57:29.000000000 +0900
@@ -1718,18 +1718,23 @@ void d_move(struct dentry * dentry, stru
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
}

-/*
- * Helper that returns 1 if p1 is a parent of p2, else 0
+/**
+ * d_ancestor - search for an ancestor
+ * @p1: ancestor dentry
+ * @p2: child dentry
+ *
+ * Returns the ancestor dentry of p2 which is a child of p1, if p1 is
+ * an ancestor of p2, else NULL.
*/
-static int d_isparent(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
+struct dentry *d_ancestor(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
{
struct dentry *p;

for (p = p2; !IS_ROOT(p); p = p->d_parent) {
if (p->d_parent == p1)
- return 1;
+ return p;
}
- return 0;
+ return NULL;
}

/*
@@ -1753,7 +1758,7 @@ static struct dentry *__d_unalias(struct

/* Check for loops */
ret = ERR_PTR(-ELOOP);
- if (d_isparent(alias, dentry))
+ if (d_ancestor(alias, dentry))
goto out_err;

/* See lock_rename() */
@@ -2153,31 +2158,27 @@ out:
* Caller must ensure that "new_dentry" is pinned before calling is_subdir()
*/

-int is_subdir(struct dentry * new_dentry, struct dentry * old_dentry)
+int is_subdir(struct dentry *new_dentry, struct dentry *old_dentry)
{
int result;
- struct dentry * saved = new_dentry;
unsigned long seq;

- /* need rcu_readlock to protect against the d_parent trashing due to
- * d_move
+ /* FIXME: This is old behavior, needed? Please check callers. */
+ if (new_dentry == old_dentry)
+ return 1;
+
+ /*
+ * Need rcu_readlock to protect against the d_parent trashing
+ * due to d_move
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- do {
+ do {
/* for restarting inner loop in case of seq retry */
- new_dentry = saved;
- result = 0;
seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
- for (;;) {
- if (new_dentry != old_dentry) {
- if (IS_ROOT(new_dentry))
- break;
- new_dentry = new_dentry->d_parent;
- continue;
- }
+ if (d_ancestor(old_dentry, new_dentry))
result = 1;
- break;
- }
+ else
+ result = 0;
} while (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq));
rcu_read_unlock();

diff -puN include/linux/dcache.h~dcache-cleanup-2 include/linux/dcache.h
--- vfs-2.6/include/linux/dcache.h~dcache-cleanup-2 2008-10-16 06:57:29.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/include/linux/dcache.h 2008-10-16 06:57:29.000000000 +0900
@@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ static inline struct dentry *d_add_uniqu

/* used for rename() and baskets */
extern void d_move(struct dentry *, struct dentry *);
+extern struct dentry *d_ancestor(struct dentry *, struct dentry *);

/* appendix may either be NULL or be used for transname suffixes */
extern struct dentry * d_lookup(struct dentry *, struct qstr *);
diff -puN fs/namei.c~dcache-cleanup-2 fs/namei.c
--- vfs-2.6/fs/namei.c~dcache-cleanup-2 2008-10-16 06:57:29.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/fs/namei.c 2008-10-16 06:57:29.000000000 +0900
@@ -1454,20 +1454,18 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry

mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);

- for (p = p1; !IS_ROOT(p); p = p->d_parent) {
- if (p->d_parent == p2) {
- mutex_lock_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
- mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
- return p;
- }
+ p = d_ancestor(p2, p1);
+ if (p) {
+ mutex_lock_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
+ return p;
}

- for (p = p2; !IS_ROOT(p); p = p->d_parent) {
- if (p->d_parent == p1) {
- mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
- mutex_lock_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
- return p;
- }
+ p = d_ancestor(p1, p2);
+ if (p) {
+ mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&p2->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
+ return p;
}

mutex_lock_nested(&p1->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
_

2008-10-15 22:51:59

by OGAWA Hirofumi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH vfs-2.6 3/6] vfs: add __d_instantiate() helper


This adds __d_instantiate() for users which is already taking
dcache_lock, and replace with it.

The part of d_add_ci() isn't equivalent. But it should be needed
fsnotify_d_instantiate() actually, because the path is to add the
inode to negative dentry. fsnotify_d_instantiate() should be called
after change from negative to positive.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
---

fs/dcache.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/dcache.c~dcache-cleanup-3 fs/dcache.c
--- vfs-2.6/fs/dcache.c~dcache-cleanup-3 2008-10-16 06:57:31.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/fs/dcache.c 2008-10-16 06:57:31.000000000 +0900
@@ -981,6 +981,15 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_name(struct dentr
return d_alloc(parent, &q);
}

+/* the caller must hold dcache_lock */
+static void __d_instantiate(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
+{
+ if (inode)
+ list_add(&dentry->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
+ dentry->d_inode = inode;
+ fsnotify_d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
+}
+
/**
* d_instantiate - fill in inode information for a dentry
* @entry: dentry to complete
@@ -1000,10 +1009,7 @@ void d_instantiate(struct dentry *entry,
{
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&entry->d_alias));
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
- if (inode)
- list_add(&entry->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
- entry->d_inode = inode;
- fsnotify_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
+ __d_instantiate(entry, inode);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
security_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
}
@@ -1033,7 +1039,7 @@ static struct dentry *__d_instantiate_un
unsigned int hash = entry->d_name.hash;

if (!inode) {
- entry->d_inode = NULL;
+ __d_instantiate(entry, NULL);
return NULL;
}

@@ -1052,9 +1058,7 @@ static struct dentry *__d_instantiate_un
return alias;
}

- list_add(&entry->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
- entry->d_inode = inode;
- fsnotify_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
+ __d_instantiate(entry, inode);
return NULL;
}

@@ -1213,10 +1217,8 @@ struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct ino
d_move(new, dentry);
iput(inode);
} else {
- /* d_instantiate takes dcache_lock, so we do it by hand */
- list_add(&dentry->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
- dentry->d_inode = inode;
- fsnotify_d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
+ /* already taking dcache_lock, so d_add() by hand */
+ __d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
security_d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
d_rehash(dentry);
@@ -1299,8 +1301,7 @@ struct dentry *d_add_ci(struct dentry *d
* d_instantiate() by hand because it takes dcache_lock which
* we already hold.
*/
- list_add(&found->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
- found->d_inode = inode;
+ __d_instantiate(found, inode);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
security_d_instantiate(found, inode);
return found;
@@ -1831,7 +1832,7 @@ struct dentry *d_materialise_unique(stru

if (!inode) {
actual = dentry;
- dentry->d_inode = NULL;
+ __d_instantiate(dentry, NULL);
goto found_lock;
}

_

2008-10-15 22:52:22

by OGAWA Hirofumi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH vfs-2.6 6/6] vfs: add LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET intent


This adds LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET intent for lookup of rename destination.

LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET is going to be used like LOOKUP_CREATE. But since
the destination of rename() can be existing directory entry, so it has a
difference. Although that difference doesn't matter in my usage, this
tells it to user of this intent.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
---

fs/namei.c | 1 +
include/linux/namei.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff -puN fs/namei.c~dcache-add-rename-intent fs/namei.c
--- vfs-2.6/fs/namei.c~dcache-add-rename-intent 2008-10-16 06:57:40.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/fs/namei.c 2008-10-16 06:57:40.000000000 +0900
@@ -2654,6 +2654,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_renameat(int olddfd,

oldnd.flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
newnd.flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
+ newnd.flags |= LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET;

trap = lock_rename(new_dir, old_dir);

diff -puN include/linux/namei.h~dcache-add-rename-intent include/linux/namei.h
--- vfs-2.6/include/linux/namei.h~dcache-add-rename-intent 2008-10-16 06:57:40.000000000 +0900
+++ vfs-2.6-hirofumi/include/linux/namei.h 2008-10-16 06:58:05.000000000 +0900
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ enum {LAST_NORM, LAST_ROOT, LAST_DOT, LA
#define LOOKUP_OPEN 0x0100
#define LOOKUP_CREATE 0x0200
#define LOOKUP_EXCL 0x0400
+#define LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET 0x0800

extern int user_path_at(int, const char __user *, unsigned, struct path *);

_

2008-10-16 22:30:34

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH vfs-2.6 6/6] vfs: add LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET intent


I put these six patches into my tree for sending to Al when he
resurfaces.

We're near the end of the merge window and a lot of trees (including
git-vfs) have a lot of outstanding material:

-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 2168830 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-firmware.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 1999274 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-bdev.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 1643851 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-tip.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 1137163 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-uwb.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 1003617 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-kvm.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 992495 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-v4l-dvb.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 849673 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-parisc.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 661519 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-scsi-post-merge.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 652920 Oct 15 14:23 patches/git-arm.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 589596 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-creds.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 568498 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-scsi.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 410896 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-drm.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 404578 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-ftrace.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 352603 Oct 15 14:23 patches/git-acpi.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 314552 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-sh.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 254238 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-mtd.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 203336 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-tests.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 199476 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-timers.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 192928 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-v9fs.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 158605 Oct 15 14:23 patches/git-avr32.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 152326 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-input.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 138826 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-pci.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 135356 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-slab.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 125258 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-vfs.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 122588 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-nfs.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 120826 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-sparseirq.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 120746 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-cris.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 105868 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-kmemcheck.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 101011 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-mfd.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 93335 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-tip-core.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 84488 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-ubifs.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 46595 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-net-current.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 30945 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-stackprotector.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 30415 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-crypto.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 30354 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-x86.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 29001 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-fastboot.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 28915 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-hid.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 26872 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-wireless-current.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 25944 Oct 15 14:23 patches/git-backlight.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 23001 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-block.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 20753 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-sound-current.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 20752 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-sound.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 20616 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-semaphore-removal.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 19849 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-trivial.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 17854 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-genirq.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 17689 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-gfs2.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 17135 Oct 15 14:23 patches/git-battery.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 13923 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-s390.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 12604 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-nfsd.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 12151 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-leds.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 8330 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-cpus4096.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 6612 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-infiniband.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 4421 Oct 15 14:16 patches/git-tests-git-rejects.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 4270 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-kgdb.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 3898 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-ubi.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 3855 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-safe-poison-pointers.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 3402 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-xtensa.patch
-rw-r----- 1 akpm src 3326 Oct 15 14:24 patches/git-oprofile.patch

2008-10-16 23:30:57

by OGAWA Hirofumi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH vfs-2.6 6/6] vfs: add LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET intent

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:

> I put these six patches into my tree for sending to Al when he
> resurfaces.

Thanks. I'm happy with it.

> We're near the end of the merge window and a lot of trees (including
> git-vfs) have a lot of outstanding material:
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>