From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
There is a spelling mistake in a nvkm_debug message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
index 8bcb7e79a0cb..456aed1f2a02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ gk104_ram_calc_xits(struct gk104_ram *ram, struct nvkm_ram_data *next)
nvkm_error(subdev, "unable to calc plls\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- nvkm_debug(subdev, "sucessfully calced PLLs for clock %i kHz"
+ nvkm_debug(subdev, "successfully calced PLLs for clock %i kHz"
" (refclock: %i kHz)\n", next->freq, ret);
} else {
/* calculate refpll coefficients */
--
2.20.1
On 4/18/2019 10:23 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>
> There is a spelling mistake in a nvkm_debug message. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]>
Cheers,
-Mukesh
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
> index 8bcb7e79a0cb..456aed1f2a02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk104.c
> @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ gk104_ram_calc_xits(struct gk104_ram *ram, struct nvkm_ram_data *next)
> nvkm_error(subdev, "unable to calc plls\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - nvkm_debug(subdev, "sucessfully calced PLLs for clock %i kHz"
> + nvkm_debug(subdev, "successfully calced PLLs for clock %i kHz"
> " (refclock: %i kHz)\n", next->freq, ret);
> } else {
> /* calculate refpll coefficients */