Hi Sevinj,
On 4/3/22 18:51, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:
> The function iterates an index from 0 to NUM_PMKID_CACHE and returns
> the first index for which the condition is true. If no such index is
> found, the function returns -1. Current code has a complex control
> flow that obfuscates this simple task. Replace it with a loop.
>
> Also, given the shortened function body, replace the long variable
> name psecuritypriv with a short variable name p.
>
> Reported by checkpatch:
>
> WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
>
> Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <[email protected]>
> ---
[code snip]
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE; i++)
> + if ((p->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) &&
> + (!memcmp(p->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN)))
> + return i;
> + return -1;
> }
>
> /* */
Looks good, but let's not introduce new checkpatch issue:
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#62: FILE: drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c:1645:
+ if ((p->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) &&
+ (!memcmp(p->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN)))
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin