This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.4-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 6.0.4-rc1
Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
fbdev/core: Remove remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers()
Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
mm/huge_memory: do not clobber swp_entry_t during THP split
Rafael Mendonca <[email protected]>
io-wq: Fix memory leak in worker creation
Martin Liska <[email protected]>
gcov: support GCC 12.1 and newer compilers
Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
efi: ssdt: Don't free memory if ACPI table was loaded successfully
Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
efi: efivars: Fix variable writes without query_variable_store()
Nikos Tsironis <[email protected]>
dm clone: Fix typo in block_device format specifier
Tim Huang <[email protected]>
drm/amd/pm: update SMU IP v13.0.4 driver interface version
Evan Quan <[email protected]>
drm/amd/pm: fulfill SMU13.0.0 cstate control interface
Evan Quan <[email protected]>
drm/amd/pm: disable cstate feature for gpu reset scenario
Tim Huang <[email protected]>
drm/amd/pm: add SMU IP v13.0.4 IF version define to V7
Evan Quan <[email protected]>
drm/amd/pm: fulfill SMU13.0.7 cstate control interface
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
net: flag sockets supporting msghdr originated zerocopy
Roderick Colenbrander <[email protected]>
HID: playstation: add initial DualSense Edge controller support
Roderick Colenbrander <[email protected]>
HID: playstation: stop DualSense output work on remove.
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
io_uring/net: fail zc send when unsupported by socket
Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use first online CPU as control_cpu
Basavaraj Natikar <[email protected]>
pinctrl: amd: change dev_warn to dev_dbg for additional feature support
Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
drm/i915/bios: Use hardcoded fp_timing size for generating LFP data pointers
Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
drm/i915/bios: Validate fp_timing terminator presence
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 2 +
drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c | 10 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 8 ++
.../pm/swsmu/inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_4.h | 17 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v13_0.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/arcturus_ppt.c | 8 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/aldebaran_ppt.c | 9 ++
.../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_0_ppt.c | 11 +++
.../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c | 12 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 106 ++++++++++-----------
drivers/hid/hid-ids.h | 1 +
drivers/hid/hid-playstation.c | 46 +++++++--
drivers/md/dm-clone-target.c | 2 +-
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c | 4 +-
drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c | 6 +-
drivers/video/aperture.c | 30 +++---
drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 48 ----------
fs/efivarfs/vars.c | 16 ----
include/linux/efi.h | 3 -
include/linux/fb.h | 2 -
include/linux/net.h | 1 +
io_uring/io-wq.c | 2 +-
io_uring/net.c | 2 +
kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c | 18 +++-
mm/huge_memory.c | 11 ++-
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/udp.c | 1 +
28 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
Works on my Arch Linux Server with Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6400 CPU @ 2.70GHz
Tested-by: Luna Jernberg <[email protected]>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
>
Hi Greg,
6.0.4-rc1 tested.
Run tested on:
- Intel Alder Lake x86_64 (nuc12 i7-1260P)
In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos5422
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <[email protected]>
--
Rudi
On 10/24/22 04:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
On 24/10/2022 12:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
No new regressions for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.0:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
130 tests: 128 pass, 2 fail
Linux version: 6.0.4-rc1-gd4150c7b49be
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
tegra210-p3450-0000: devices
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>
Jon
--
nvpublic
On 10/24/22 05:31, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On 10/24/22 4:31 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <[email protected]>
Hi Greg
6.0.4-rc1
compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(Intel i5-11400, Fedora 37 Beta)
Thanks
Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <[email protected]>
Hi Greg
6.0.4-rc1
compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(Intel i5-11400, Fedora 37 Beta)
Thanks
Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <[email protected]>
On 10/24/22 7:31 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
6.0.4-rc1 compiled and booted on my x86_64 test system. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <[email protected]>
All the best,
-srw
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 17:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 6.0.4-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.0.y
* git commit: [None, 'd4150c7b49be8290e2a00c80f2bb2a534a627ad6']
* git describe: v6.0.3-22-gd4150c7b49be
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.0.y/build/v6.0.3-22-gd4150c7b49be
## No sTest Regressions (compared to v6.0.3)
## No Metric Regressions (compared to v6.0.3)
## No Test Fixes (compared to v6.0.3)
## No Metric Fixes (compared to v6.0.3)
## Test result summary
total: 144226, pass: 123359, fail: 5726, skip: 14716, xfail: 425
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 329 total, 325 passed, 4 failed
* arm64: 61 total, 61 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 53 total, 53 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 54 total, 53 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 67 total, 61 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 58 total, 58 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-at
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Teest results are for 6.0.3-22-gd4150c7.
Build results:
total: 152 pass: 152 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 499 pass: 499 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.4 release.
> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:29:24 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <[email protected]>
Missed a patch?
Problematic patch in v6.0.3 :
> commit 3ea7c50339859394dd667184b5b16eee1ebb53bc
> Author: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon Aug 8 16:10:26 2022 -0400
>
> btrfs: call __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache_locked on cache load failure
> [ Upstream commit 8a1ae2781dee9fc21ca82db682d37bea4bd074ad ]
> Now that lockdep is staying enabled through our entire CI runs I started
> seeing the following stack in generic/475
See:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/Y1aeWdHd4%[email protected]/
>
> Well I definitely fucked this patch up, because I should have used the _locked
> variant, but this was part of a series where I did the correct thing in the next
> patch
>
> btrfs: remove use btrfs_remove_free_space_cache instead of variant
>
> so this problem doesn't exist in linus. So either we need to pull that back
> into stable as well, or drop this patch from stable. I'm good either way, this
> was just to fix a lockdep splat so it's not really stable material, but I'll
> leave that decision up to y'all. Thanks,
>
> Josef
>
>
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 08:36:55AM +0200, Ernst Herzberg wrote:
> Missed a patch?
>
> Problematic patch in v6.0.3 :
>
> > commit 3ea7c50339859394dd667184b5b16eee1ebb53bc
> > Author: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
> > Date: Mon Aug 8 16:10:26 2022 -0400
> >
> > btrfs: call __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache_locked on cache load failure
> > [ Upstream commit 8a1ae2781dee9fc21ca82db682d37bea4bd074ad ]
> > Now that lockdep is staying enabled through our entire CI runs I started
> > seeing the following stack in generic/475
>
>
> See:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/Y1aeWdHd4%[email protected]/
That will be resolved in the next release, give us a chance to get this
one out first...
thanks,
greg k-h