2019-08-23 08:49:59

by Haiyang Zhang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next,v5, 0/6] Add software backchannel and mlx5e HV VHCA stats



> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 3:33 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; KY Srinivasan <[email protected]>; Stephen
> Hemminger <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v5, 0/6] Add software backchannel and mlx5e
> HV VHCA stats
>
>
> I applied this patch series already to net-next, what are you doing?

The v5 is pretty much the same as v4, except Eran had a fix to patch #3 in response to
Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>.

Thanks,
- Haiyang


2019-08-23 14:56:17

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v5, 0/6] Add software backchannel and mlx5e HV VHCA stats

From: Haiyang Zhang <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 22:37:13 +0000

> The v5 is pretty much the same as v4, except Eran had a fix to patch #3 in response to
> Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>.

Well you now have to send me a patch relative to v4 in order to fix that.

When I say "applied", the series is in my tree and is therefore permanent.
It is therefore never appropriate to then post a new version of the series.

2019-08-23 16:59:56

by Saeed Mahameed

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v5, 0/6] Add software backchannel and mlx5e HV VHCA stats

On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 15:39 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Haiyang Zhang <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 22:37:13 +0000
>
> > The v5 is pretty much the same as v4, except Eran had a fix to
> patch #3 in response to
> > Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>.
>
> Well you now have to send me a patch relative to v4 in order to fix
> that.
>
> When I say "applied", the series is in my tree and is therefore
> permanent.
> It is therefore never appropriate to then post a new version of the
> series.

Dave, I think you didn't reply back to v4 that the series was applied.
So that might have created some confusion for Haiyang.