2009/4/2 David Howells <[email protected]>:
> Thanks! ?That's pretty much what I wanted... ?The one thing that's missing is
> the ability to give this to C-x b, but I suppose C-x f will have to do.
Not sure I understand -- it actually changes the name of the buffers,
so C-x b should see the names too...
(by default it retroactively renames existing buffers to reflect
needed "uniquification" too)
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.