The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py.
So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
index 1c0a75a51d79..0dc3fb0d9544 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
@@ -20,10 +20,10 @@ LSM hook:
Other LSM hooks which can be instrumented can be found in
``include/linux/lsm_hooks.h``.
-eBPF programs that use :doc:`/bpf/btf` do not need to include kernel headers
-for accessing information from the attached eBPF program's context. They can
-simply declare the structures in the eBPF program and only specify the fields
-that need to be accessed.
+eBPF programs that use Documentation/bpf/btf.rst do not need to include kernel
+headers for accessing information from the attached eBPF program's context.
+They can simply declare the structures in the eBPF program and only specify
+the fields that need to be accessed.
.. code-block:: c
@@ -88,8 +88,9 @@ example:
The ``__attribute__((preserve_access_index))`` is a clang feature that allows
the BPF verifier to update the offsets for the access at runtime using the
-:doc:`/bpf/btf` information. Since the BPF verifier is aware of the types, it
-also validates all the accesses made to the various types in the eBPF program.
+Documentation/bpf/btf.rst information. Since the BPF verifier is aware of the
+types, it also validates all the accesses made to the various types in the
+eBPF program.
Loading
-------
--
2.31.1