Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the
DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable.
Tested on SM6375.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Improve patch 1 commit message
- Add return value checking in patch 1
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
Konrad Dybcio (2):
drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks
drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
base-commit: 9dbf40840551df336c95ce2a3adbdd25ed53c0ef
change-id: 20230620-topic-dsiphy_rpm-ea4817badaab
Best regards,
--
Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the
> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable.
>
> Tested on SM6375.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/a402e0e61b75
[2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4e905c2acc9d
Best regards,
--
Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
On 11/07/2023 17:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the
>> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable.
>>
>> Tested on SM6375.
>>
>>
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/a402e0e61b75
> [2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4e905c2acc9d
Unfortunately this series breaks our CI, see [1], [2]. I had to remove
these patches for now.
I suppose this is either because of a probe deferral or because of
having subset of drivers built as module. Konrad, could you please take
a look?
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/45271774
[2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/45271775
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
On 11.07.2023 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 11/07/2023 17:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the
>>> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable.
>>>
>>> Tested on SM6375.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> [1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks
>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/a402e0e61b75
>> [2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM
>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4e905c2acc9d
>
> Unfortunately this series breaks our CI, see [1], [2]. I had to remove these patches for now.
>
> I suppose this is either because of a probe deferral or because of having subset of drivers built as module. Konrad, could you please take a look?
I see no reason why it would break things :/
You can see that rpmhpd sync_state has not completed, which means all
PDs should still be pinned at max vote..
Can we somehow retest it?
If it still fails, can you try enabling runtime pm on dispcc and hooking
up vddcx?
Konrad
>
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/45271774
> [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/45271775
>
On 15.07.2023 17:25, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11.07.2023 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 11/07/2023 17:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the
>>>> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable.
>>>>
>>>> Tested on SM6375.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>
>>> [1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks
>>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/a402e0e61b75
>>> [2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM
>>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4e905c2acc9d
>>
>> Unfortunately this series breaks our CI, see [1], [2]. I had to remove these patches for now.
>>
>> I suppose this is either because of a probe deferral or because of having subset of drivers built as module. Konrad, could you please take a look?
> I see no reason why it would break things :/
>
> You can see that rpmhpd sync_state has not completed, which means all
> PDs should still be pinned at max vote..
>
> Can we somehow retest it?
>
> If it still fails, can you try enabling runtime pm on dispcc and hooking
> up vddcx?
IIRC this was a fluke with the CI, can we retry?
Konrad
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the
> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable.
>
> Tested on SM6375.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/3d07a411b4fa
[2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/6ab502bc1cf3
Best regards,
--
Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>