2001-07-05 08:13:05

by Andreas Jaeger

Subject: N_HCI for S390x missing in 2.4.5

Looking at the patch for 2.4.5, I noticed that all architectures use
N_HCI - except s390x which has N_BT.

Why is this different? I propose to use N_HCI everywhere,

Andreas

diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.4.5/linux/include/asm-s390/termios.h linux/include/asm-s390/termios.h
--- v2.4.5/linux/include/asm-s390/termios.h Tue Feb 13 14:13:44 2001
+++ linux/include/asm-s390/termios.h Mon Jun 11 19:15:27 2001
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
#define N_IRDA 11 /* Linux IR - http://irda.sourceforge.net/ */
#define N_SMSBLOCK 12 /* SMS block mode - for talking to GSM data cards about SMS messages */
#define N_HDLC 13 /* synchronous HDLC */
+#define N_HCI 15 /* Bluetooth HCI UART */
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.4.5/linux/include/asm-s390x/termios.h linux/include/asm-s390x/termios.h
--- v2.4.5/linux/include/asm-s390x/termios.h Wed Apr 11 19:02:29 2001
+++ linux/include/asm-s390x/termios.h Mon Jun 11 19:15:27 2001
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
#define N_IRDA 11 /* Linux IR - http://irda.sourceforge.net/ */
#define N_SMSBLOCK 12 /* SMS block mode - for talking to GSM data cards about SMS messages */
#define N_HDLC 13 /* synchronous HDLC */
+#define N_BT 15 /* bluetooth */


--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs [email protected]
private [email protected]
http://www.suse.de/~aj

2001-07-05 08:56:31

by Martin Schwidefsky

Subject: Re: N_HCI for S390x missing in 2.4.5

>Looking at the patch for 2.4.5, I noticed that all architectures use
>N_HCI - except s390x which has N_BT.
>
>Why is this different? I propose to use N_HCI everywhere,

It should not be different for s390x. Probably a typo. I will fix it
and the patch will go out with the next update.

blue skies,
Martin

Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Sch?naicherstr. 220, D-71032 B?blingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247
E-Mail: [email protected]