The patch fixes regression introduced by
commit 40613da52b13fb ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
I'm not sure about proper process for PCI tree, but is it's not too late
the patch shall replace the revert (from branch for-linus)
commit f3b827a92f7d54 ('Revert "PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary"')
Igor Mammedov (1):
PCI: acpiphp:: use pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() only if
bus->self not NULL
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.39.3
Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
bridge associated.
1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
(likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
without bridge assigned to it.
Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine provides
PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. to reproduce boot kernel at
commit [1] in VM started with followin CLI and hotplug a device:
once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
(qemu) device_add e1000
it will cause NULL pointer dereference at
void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
{
struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
[ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
[...]
[ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
[ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
[ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
[ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
[ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
[ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
[ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
[ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
[ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
[ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
[ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
following sequence:
1. suspend to RAM
2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()as we used to do
but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
with it.
That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
but at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
1)
Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reported-by: Woody Suwalski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
index 328d1e416014..3bc4e1f3efee 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
@@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
acpiphp_native_scan_bridge(dev);
}
} else {
+ LIST_HEAD(add_list);
int max, pass;
acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
@@ -511,10 +512,15 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
if (pass && dev->subordinate) {
check_hotplug_bridge(slot, dev);
pcibios_resource_survey_bus(dev->subordinate);
+ if (!bus->self)
+ __pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate, &add_list);
}
}
}
- pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
+ if (bus->self)
+ pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
+ else
+ __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
}
acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
--
2.39.3
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:35 PM Igor Mammedov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> bridge associated.
> 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> without bridge assigned to it.
>
> Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine provides
> PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. to reproduce boot kernel at
> commit [1] in VM started with followin CLI and hotplug a device:
>
> once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
>
> (qemu) device_add e1000
>
> it will cause NULL pointer dereference at
>
> void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> {
> struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
>
> [ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> [...]
> [ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
> [ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
> [ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
> [ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
> [ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
> [ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
> [ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
> [ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
> [ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
> [ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
> [ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
>
> The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> following sequence:
> 1. suspend to RAM
> 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
>
> Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()as we used to do
> but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
> with it.
>
> That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
> but at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
> root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
>
> 1)
> Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Reported-by: Woody Suwalski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> index 328d1e416014..3bc4e1f3efee 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> acpiphp_native_scan_bridge(dev);
> }
> } else {
> + LIST_HEAD(add_list);
> int max, pass;
>
> acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
> @@ -511,10 +512,15 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> if (pass && dev->subordinate) {
> check_hotplug_bridge(slot, dev);
> pcibios_resource_survey_bus(dev->subordinate);
> + if (!bus->self)
> + __pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate, &add_list);
> }
> }
> }
> - pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> + if (bus->self)
> + pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> + else
> + __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
> }
>
> acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
> --
> 2.39.3
>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> bridge associated.
> 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> without bridge assigned to it.
>
> Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine provides
> PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. to reproduce boot kernel at
> commit [1] in VM started with followin CLI and hotplug a device:
>
> once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
>
> (qemu) device_add e1000
>
> it will cause NULL pointer dereference at
>
> void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> {
> struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
>
> [ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> [...]
> [ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
> [ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
> [ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
> [ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
> [ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
> [ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
> [ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
> [ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
> [ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
> [ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
> [ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
>
> The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> following sequence:
> 1. suspend to RAM
> 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
>
> Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()as we used to do
> but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
> with it.
>
> That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
> but at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
> root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
>
> 1)
> Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Reported-by: Woody Suwalski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> index 328d1e416014..3bc4e1f3efee 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> acpiphp_native_scan_bridge(dev);
> }
> } else {
> + LIST_HEAD(add_list);
> int max, pass;
>
> acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
> @@ -511,10 +512,15 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> if (pass && dev->subordinate) {
> check_hotplug_bridge(slot, dev);
> pcibios_resource_survey_bus(dev->subordinate);
> + if (!bus->self)
> + __pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate, &add_list);
> }
> }
> }
> - pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> + if (bus->self)
> + pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> + else
> + __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
> }
>
> acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
> --
> 2.39.3
Thank you to both you and Woody for chasing this down!
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> bridge associated.
> 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> without bridge assigned to it.
Do we have evidence about the details of this non-existent root port?
If we do, I think it would be interesting to include a URL to them in
case there's some hole in the way we handle Bus Check events.
> Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine provides
> PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. to reproduce boot kernel at
> commit [1] in VM started with followin CLI and hotplug a device:
You mention CLI; did you mean to include a qemu command line here?
Maybe it's the same thing mentioned in the 40613da52b13 commit log?
I tried briefly to reproduce this using the 40613da52b13 command line
but haven't quite got it going yet. I think it would be very useful
to either include it here again or point to the 40613da52b13 commit
log.
> once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
>
> (qemu) device_add e1000
>
> it will cause NULL pointer dereference at
>
> void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> {
> struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
>
> [ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> [...]
> [ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
> [ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
> [ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
> [ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
> [ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
> [ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
> [ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
> [ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
> [ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
> [ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
> [ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
>
> The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> following sequence:
> 1. suspend to RAM
> 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
>
> Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()as we used to do
> but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
> with it.
>
> That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
> but at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
> root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
>
> 1)
> Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Reported-by: Woody Suwalski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> index 328d1e416014..3bc4e1f3efee 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> acpiphp_native_scan_bridge(dev);
> }
> } else {
> + LIST_HEAD(add_list);
> int max, pass;
>
> acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
> @@ -511,10 +512,15 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> if (pass && dev->subordinate) {
> check_hotplug_bridge(slot, dev);
> pcibios_resource_survey_bus(dev->subordinate);
> + if (!bus->self)
> + __pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate, &add_list);
> }
> }
> }
> - pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> + if (bus->self)
> + pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> + else
> + __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
> }
>
> acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
> --
> 2.39.3
>
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:41:02 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you to both you and Woody for chasing this down!
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> > when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> > bridge associated.
> > 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> > (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> > 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> > existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> > endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> > without bridge assigned to it.
>
> Do we have evidence about the details of this non-existent root port?
> If we do, I think it would be interesting to include a URL to them in
> case there's some hole in the way we handle Bus Check events.
it's scattered over logs Woody has provided, here are links to
emails with
1: lspci output
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
according to lscpi and dmesg there is only one root-port at 1c.0
which is occupied by wifi card
while DSTD table has more ports described, which is fine as long as
missing/disabled are not reported as present.
2: last round of logs with debug patch /before 40613da5, with 40613da5, and after/
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
here dmesg shows 1st correct port
ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP03: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 000000000dad0b34
and then later on
ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP07: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP08: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
which aren't recognized as bridge
I don't know ACPICA code enough to guesstimate where we might miss
a check that device is actually exists to do further debug
over mail list within reasonable timeframe.
> > Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine provides
> > PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. to reproduce boot kernel at
> > commit [1] in VM started with followin CLI and hotplug a device:
>
> You mention CLI; did you mean to include a qemu command line here?
> Maybe it's the same thing mentioned in the 40613da52b13 commit log?
> I tried briefly to reproduce this using the 40613da52b13 command line
> but haven't quite got it going yet. I think it would be very useful
> to either include it here again or point to the 40613da52b13 commit
> log.
my bad, I didn't realize that saying 'pc' machine is not sufficient.
minimal CLI can be (important part '-M pc -monitor stdio',
the rest is for making guest boot and run at tolerable speed):
$QEMU -M pc -m 4G -monitor stdio -cpu host --enable-kvm vm_disk_image
Will you amend commit message or shall I repost with changes/Acks?
> > once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
> >
> > (qemu) device_add e1000
> >
> > it will cause NULL pointer dereference at
> >
> > void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> > {
> > struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
> >
> > [ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> > [...]
> > [ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
> > [ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
> > [ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
> > [ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
> > [ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> > [ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
> > [ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
> > [ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
> > [ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
> > [ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> > [ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
> > [ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > [ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
> > [ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > [ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
> >
> > The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> > following sequence:
> > 1. suspend to RAM
> > 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> > 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
> >
> > Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()as we used to do
> > but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
> > with it.
> >
> > That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
> > but at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
> > root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
> >
> > 1)
> > Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> > Reported-by: Woody Suwalski <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > index 328d1e416014..3bc4e1f3efee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> > acpiphp_native_scan_bridge(dev);
> > }
> > } else {
> > + LIST_HEAD(add_list);
> > int max, pass;
> >
> > acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
> > @@ -511,10 +512,15 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> > if (pass && dev->subordinate) {
> > check_hotplug_bridge(slot, dev);
> > pcibios_resource_survey_bus(dev->subordinate);
> > + if (!bus->self)
> > + __pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate, &add_list);
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > - pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> > + if (bus->self)
> > + pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> > + else
> > + __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
> > }
> >
> > acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
> > --
> > 2.39.3
> >
>
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 11:32:16AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:41:02 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> > > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > > which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> > > when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> > > bridge associated.
> > > 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> > > (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> > > 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> > > existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> > > endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> > > without bridge assigned to it.
> >
> > Do we have evidence about the details of this non-existent root port?
> > If we do, I think it would be interesting to include a URL to them in
> > case there's some hole in the way we handle Bus Check events.
>
> it's scattered over logs Woody has provided, here are links to
> emails with
> 1: lspci output
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
>
> according to lscpi and dmesg there is only one root-port at 1c.0
> which is occupied by wifi card
>
> while DSTD table has more ports described, which is fine as long as
> missing/disabled are not reported as present.
>
> 2: last round of logs with debug patch /before 40613da5, with 40613da5, and after/
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
>
> here dmesg shows 1st correct port
> ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP03: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 000000000dad0b34
> and then later on
> ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP07: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
> ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP08: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
> which aren't recognized as bridge
Thanks, that does seem a little suspect. ACPI r6.5 sec 5.6.6 says
that when OSPM handles a Bus Check, it should "perform a Plug and Play
re-enumeration operation on the device tree starting from the point
where it has been notified."
PCI devices are enumerated by doing PCI config reads. It would make
sense to re-enumerate a PCI hierarchy starting with a PCI device
that's already known to the OS, e.g., by scanning the secondary bus of
a PCI-to-PCI bridge.
I think there are two problems here:
1) The platform shouldn't send a Bus Check notification to a PCI
device that doesn't exist. How could the OS re-enumerate
starting there?
2) Linux runs acpiphp_hotplug_notify() for Bus Checks to
non-existent PCI devices when it ignore them; reasoning below.
We call acpiphp_enumerate_slots() in this path, which happens before
any of the PCI devices on the root bus have been enumerated:
pci_register_host_bridge
pcibios_add_bus(root bus)
acpi_pci_add_bus
acpiphp_enumerate_slots(pci_bus *bus)
acpi_walk_namespace(acpiphp_add_context)
acpiphp_add_context(struct acpiphp_bridge *)
acpi_evaluate_integer("_ADR")
acpiphp_init_context
context->hp.notify = acpiphp_hotplug_notify
So now we've already looked at RP03, RP07, and RP08, and set up the
.notify() handler for all of them. Since we haven't scanned the bus
yet, we don't know that RP03 exists and RP07 and RP08 do not.
Per ACPI r6.5, sec 6, all these Device objects are "Augmented Device
Descriptors":
An Agumented [sic] Device Descriptor, which contains additional
device information that is not provided from the Device itself, yet
is needed by the Device or Bus driver in order to properly configure
and use the device. This type of device is enumerated by a
bus-specific enumeration mechanism, and OSPM uses the Address (_ADR)
to match the ACPI Device object in the Namespace to the device
discovered through bus enumeration.
I think that means OSPM should discover a PCI device using the PCI
bus-specific enumeration mechanism (i.e., config reads) before it even
looks for a corresponding ACPI Device object, and it should only set
up .notify() for PCI devices that actually exist, so the Bus Checks on
RP07 and RP08 would be ignored and we wouldn't even get into the path
that causes the NULL pointer dereference:
acpi_device_hotplug
acpiphp_hotplug_notify # from hp.notify
hotplug_event
bridge = context->bridge
case BUS_CHECK:
if (bridge)
acpiphp_check_bridge
else if (!SLOT_IS_GOING_AWAY)
enable_slot
bus = slot->bus # "bus" is a root bus
pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self)
bridge = bus->self # "bridge" is NULL since
# bus->self is NULL for root buses
struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate
# NULL pointer dereference
Obviously none of this helps solve the current regression. Changing
the .notify() setup would be a big change, it would be risky because
it might affect dock support, and it still wouldn't fix your case 1 of
hotplug on the root bus in a virtualized environment.
> > > Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine provides
> > > PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. to reproduce boot kernel at
> > > commit [1] in VM started with followin CLI and hotplug a device:
> >
> > You mention CLI; did you mean to include a qemu command line here?
> > Maybe it's the same thing mentioned in the 40613da52b13 commit log?
> > I tried briefly to reproduce this using the 40613da52b13 command line
> > but haven't quite got it going yet. I think it would be very useful
> > to either include it here again or point to the 40613da52b13 commit
> > log.
>
> my bad, I didn't realize that saying 'pc' machine is not sufficient.
>
> minimal CLI can be (important part '-M pc -monitor stdio',
> the rest is for making guest boot and run at tolerable speed):
>
> $QEMU -M pc -m 4G -monitor stdio -cpu host --enable-kvm vm_disk_image
>
> Will you amend commit message or shall I repost with changes/Acks?
I'll give it a shot and post it for your comments.
> > > once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
> > >
> > > (qemu) device_add e1000
> > >
> > > it will cause NULL pointer dereference at
> > >
> > > void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> > > {
> > > struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
This worked for me (after setting CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI=y :)):
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc -m 512M -monitor stdio -cpu host --enable-kvm -kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage -drive format=raw,file=ubuntu.img -append "root=/dev/sda1"
(qemu) device_add e1000
(For posterity, replacing "-monitor stdio" with "-nographic -monitor
telnet:localhost:7001,server,nowait,nodelay" and adding
"console=ttyS0,115200n8" to the -append made it easier to see the
crash details.)
> > > [ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> > > [...]
> > > [ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
> > > [ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
> > > [ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
> > > [ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
> > > [ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> > > [ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
> > > [ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
> > > [ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
> > > [ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
> > > [ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> > > [ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
> > > [ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > > [ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
> > > [ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > > [ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
> > >
> > > The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> > > following sequence:
> > > 1. suspend to RAM
> > > 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> > > 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
> > >
> > > Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
> > > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()as we used to do
> > > but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
> > > with it.
> > >
> > > That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
> > > but at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
> > > root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
> > >
> > > 1)
> > > Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> > > Reported-by: Woody Suwalski <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > > index 328d1e416014..3bc4e1f3efee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > > @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> > > acpiphp_native_scan_bridge(dev);
> > > }
> > > } else {
> > > + LIST_HEAD(add_list);
> > > int max, pass;
> > >
> > > acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
> > > @@ -511,10 +512,15 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> > > if (pass && dev->subordinate) {
> > > check_hotplug_bridge(slot, dev);
> > > pcibios_resource_survey_bus(dev->subordinate);
> > > + if (!bus->self)
> > > + __pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate, &add_list);
> > > }
> > > }
> > > }
> > > - pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> > > + if (bus->self)
> > > + pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> > > + else
> > > + __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
I really wish we didn't have such different resource assignment paths
depending on whether the device is on a root bus or deeper in the
hierarchy. But we can't fix that now, so this seems like the right
thing.
But would you be OK with this minor mod?
if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
__pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate, &add_list);
...
if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
__pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
else
pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
For two reasons: (1) test the same condition both places, and (2) be a
little more explicit about the scenario (and "bus->self == NULL" also
happens for the virtual buses added for SR-IOV).
> > > }
> > >
> > > acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
> > > --
> > > 2.39.3
> > >
> >
>
A reproducer for [1], faking a missing device (supposedly root port)
on root bus, and ability to send BusCheck to it.
Usage:
./qemu-system-x86_64 -monitor stdio -M q35 -cpu host -smp 4 -enable-kvm -m 4G
-nographic
-monitor stdio
-snapshot
-serial file:/tmp/s
-kernel ~/builds/linux-2.6/arch/x86/boot/bzImage
-append 'root=/dev/sda1 console=ttyS0'
-device pcie-root-port,id=rp1,bus=pcie.0,chassis=0,addr=8
vm_disk_image
wait till it boots and then at monitor prompt hotplug a device
(no hotplug will happen since hacked AML code will send only
notify to missing device, but it's sufficient to reproduce kernel crash
at commit [2]):
(qemu) device_add e1000e,bus=rp1
observe in guest logs:
[ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
[...]
[ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
[ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
[ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
[ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
[ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
[ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
[ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
[ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
[ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
[ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
[ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
1)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2)
commit 40613da52b13fb ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index 9c74fa17ad..f6c2584289 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -1784,11 +1784,18 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
if (pci_host) {
PCIBus *bus = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(pci_host)->bus;
Aml *scope = aml_scope("PCI0");
+ Aml *dev;
/* Scan all PCI buses. Generate tables to support hotplug. */
build_append_pci_bus_devices(scope, bus);
if (object_property_find(OBJECT(bus), ACPI_PCIHP_PROP_BSEL)) {
build_append_pcihp_slots(scope, bus);
}
+
+ /* nonexisting PCI device */
+ dev = aml_device("RPX");
+ aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(0x100000)));
+ aml_append(scope, dev);
+
aml_append(sb_scope, scope);
}
}
@@ -1852,12 +1859,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
scope = aml_scope("_GPE");
{
method = aml_method("_E01", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
- if (has_pcnt) {
- aml_append(method,
- aml_acquire(aml_name("\\_SB.PCI0.BLCK"), 0xFFFF));
- aml_append(method, aml_call0("\\_SB.PCI0.PCNT"));
- aml_append(method, aml_release(aml_name("\\_SB.PCI0.BLCK")));
- }
+ /* send BusCheck to non-present PCI device */
+ aml_append(method, aml_notify(aml_name("\\_SB.PCI0.RPX"), aml_int(0)));
aml_append(scope, method);
}
aml_append(dsdt, scope);
--
2.39.3
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 16:50:09 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 11:32:16AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:41:02 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> > > > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > > > which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> > > > when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> > > > bridge associated.
> > > > 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> > > > (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> > > > 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> > > > existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> > > > endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> > > > without bridge assigned to it.
> > >
> > > Do we have evidence about the details of this non-existent root port?
> > > If we do, I think it would be interesting to include a URL to them in
> > > case there's some hole in the way we handle Bus Check events.
> >
> > it's scattered over logs Woody has provided, here are links to
> > emails with
> > 1: lspci output
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
> >
> > according to lscpi and dmesg there is only one root-port at 1c.0
> > which is occupied by wifi card
> >
> > while DSTD table has more ports described, which is fine as long as
> > missing/disabled are not reported as present.
> >
> > 2: last round of logs with debug patch /before 40613da5, with 40613da5, and after/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
> >
> > here dmesg shows 1st correct port
> > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP03: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 000000000dad0b34
> > and then later on
> > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP07: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
> > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP08: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
> > which aren't recognized as bridge
>
> Thanks, that does seem a little suspect. ACPI r6.5 sec 5.6.6 says
> that when OSPM handles a Bus Check, it should "perform a Plug and Play
> re-enumeration operation on the device tree starting from the point
> where it has been notified."
>
> PCI devices are enumerated by doing PCI config reads. It would make
> sense to re-enumerate a PCI hierarchy starting with a PCI device
> that's already known to the OS, e.g., by scanning the secondary bus of
> a PCI-to-PCI bridge.
>
> I think there are two problems here:
>
> 1) The platform shouldn't send a Bus Check notification to a PCI
> device that doesn't exist. How could the OS re-enumerate
> starting there?
in case of reported laptop, DSDT provides Device Descriptors
for not existing root-ports.
OSPM can't do anything with it but to pass Notify event to
PCI bus-specific enumeration mechanism, and it's upto PCI subsystem
to discard/ignore Notify() on this ACPI node.
I think I can mock this case by hacking QEMU, that should help
with finding a proper place to fix it.
(here it is:
https://gitlab.com/imammedo/qemu/-/commits/acpiphp_buscheck_on_missing_device?ref_type=heads
I'll post hack patch as a reply to this email for posterity)
> 2) Linux runs acpiphp_hotplug_notify() for Bus Checks to
> non-existent PCI devices when it ignore them; reasoning below.
>
> We call acpiphp_enumerate_slots() in this path, which happens before
> any of the PCI devices on the root bus have been enumerated:
>
> pci_register_host_bridge
> pcibios_add_bus(root bus)
> acpi_pci_add_bus
> acpiphp_enumerate_slots(pci_bus *bus)
> acpi_walk_namespace(acpiphp_add_context)
> acpiphp_add_context(struct acpiphp_bridge *)
> acpi_evaluate_integer("_ADR")
> acpiphp_init_context
> context->hp.notify = acpiphp_hotplug_notify
>
> So now we've already looked at RP03, RP07, and RP08, and set up the
> .notify() handler for all of them. Since we haven't scanned the bus
> yet, we don't know that RP03 exists and RP07 and RP08 do not.
While ACPI doesn't forbid firmware to describe non-existing RP,
the PCIe hostbridge can't hotplug extra root ports. (and QEMU
follows PCIe design in this respect on 'q35' machine).
However when it comes to hotplug on QEMU's 'pc' machine
(hotplug on root bus), each slot has "Augmented Device
Descriptors", that includes un-populated slots leading to
the presence of .notify() handler on such slots.
Then later on when device is hotplugged, a Notify(,1/*DeviceCheck*/)
is sent to previously empty slot and from there on PCI subsystem
re-enumerates either a single device or a bridge hierarchy
(from the parent context).
So I'd assume that we need to have .notify() handler for all slots
that are described in DSDT (present and non present).
> Per ACPI r6.5, sec 6, all these Device objects are "Augmented Device
> Descriptors":
>
> An Agumented [sic] Device Descriptor, which contains additional
> device information that is not provided from the Device itself, yet
> is needed by the Device or Bus driver in order to properly configure
> and use the device. This type of device is enumerated by a
> bus-specific enumeration mechanism, and OSPM uses the Address (_ADR)
> to match the ACPI Device object in the Namespace to the device
> discovered through bus enumeration.
>
> I think that means OSPM should discover a PCI device using the PCI
> bus-specific enumeration mechanism (i.e., config reads) before it even
> looks for a corresponding ACPI Device object, and it should only set
> up .notify() for PCI devices that actually exist, so the Bus Checks on
> RP07 and RP08 would be ignored and we wouldn't even get into the path
> that causes the NULL pointer dereference:
>
> acpi_device_hotplug
> acpiphp_hotplug_notify # from hp.notify
> hotplug_event
> bridge = context->bridge
> case BUS_CHECK:
> if (bridge)
> acpiphp_check_bridge
> else if (!SLOT_IS_GOING_AWAY)
> enable_slot
> bus = slot->bus # "bus" is a root bus
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self)
> bridge = bus->self # "bridge" is NULL since
> # bus->self is NULL for root buses
> struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate
> # NULL pointer dereference
>
> Obviously none of this helps solve the current regression. Changing
> the .notify() setup would be a big change, it would be risky because
> it might affect dock support, and it still wouldn't fix your case 1 of
> hotplug on the root bus in a virtualized environment.
>
> > > > Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine provides
> > > > PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. to reproduce boot kernel at
> > > > commit [1] in VM started with followin CLI and hotplug a device:
> > >
> > > You mention CLI; did you mean to include a qemu command line here?
> > > Maybe it's the same thing mentioned in the 40613da52b13 commit log?
> > > I tried briefly to reproduce this using the 40613da52b13 command line
> > > but haven't quite got it going yet. I think it would be very useful
> > > to either include it here again or point to the 40613da52b13 commit
> > > log.
> >
> > my bad, I didn't realize that saying 'pc' machine is not sufficient.
> >
> > minimal CLI can be (important part '-M pc -monitor stdio',
> > the rest is for making guest boot and run at tolerable speed):
> >
> > $QEMU -M pc -m 4G -monitor stdio -cpu host --enable-kvm vm_disk_image
> >
> > Will you amend commit message or shall I repost with changes/Acks?
>
> I'll give it a shot and post it for your comments.
>
> > > > once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
> > > >
> > > > (qemu) device_add e1000
> > > >
> > > > it will cause NULL pointer dereference at
> > > >
> > > > void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> > > > {
> > > > struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
>
> This worked for me (after setting CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI=y :)):
>
> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc -m 512M -monitor stdio -cpu host --enable-kvm -kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage -drive format=raw,file=ubuntu.img -append "root=/dev/sda1"
> (qemu) device_add e1000
>
> (For posterity, replacing "-monitor stdio" with "-nographic -monitor
> telnet:localhost:7001,server,nowait,nodelay" and adding
> "console=ttyS0,115200n8" to the -append made it easier to see the
> crash details.)
I've not put extra arguments, because there is a lot of ways
one can configure/use monitor/serial options.
But specifying full command line like yours will be useful
for anyone who doesn't have any experience with QEMU CLI.
> > > > [ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> > > > [...]
> > > > [ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
> > > > [ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
> > > > [ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
> > > > [ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
> > > > [ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> > > > [ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
> > > > [ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
> > > > [ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
> > > > [ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
> > > > [ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> > > > [ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
> > > > [ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > > > [ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
> > > > [ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > > > [ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
> > > >
> > > > The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> > > > following sequence:
> > > > 1. suspend to RAM
> > > > 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> > > > 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
> > > >
> > > > Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
> > > > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()as we used to do
> > > > but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
> > > > with it.
> > > >
> > > > That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
> > > > but at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
> > > > root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
> > > >
> > > > 1)
> > > > Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> > > > Reported-by: Woody Suwalski <[email protected]>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > > > index 328d1e416014..3bc4e1f3efee 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > > > @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> > > > acpiphp_native_scan_bridge(dev);
> > > > }
> > > > } else {
> > > > + LIST_HEAD(add_list);
> > > > int max, pass;
> > > >
> > > > acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
> > > > @@ -511,10 +512,15 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot, bool bridge)
> > > > if (pass && dev->subordinate) {
> > > > check_hotplug_bridge(slot, dev);
> > > > pcibios_resource_survey_bus(dev->subordinate);
> > > > + if (!bus->self)
> > > > + __pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate, &add_list);
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > - pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> > > > + if (bus->self)
> > > > + pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
> > > > + else
> > > > + __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
>
> I really wish we didn't have such different resource assignment paths
> depending on whether the device is on a root bus or deeper in the
> hierarchy. But we can't fix that now, so this seems like the right
> thing.
I've looked at possibility of making
pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
work without bridge pointer, but it looks not viable as it's
a bridge dedicated function which on top of rearranging
resources, also disables/reprograms/enables bridge.
If there are ideas how to make it better,
I can pick it up and try to implement.
Testing shows that pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
isn't ideal since it releases all resources before reassigning
and then if the later fails bridge stays in mis-configured
state (attempt to recover results in failing BAR assignment
to children devices).
It's not issue in case of
root-port -> 1 child device hotplug
since root port hadn't any working device[s] behind it.
But in case of hotplug into PCI bridge, that leaves
pre-existing devices behind the bridge broken (SHPC and acpiphp case).
> But would you be OK with this minor mod?
>
> if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
> __pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate, &add_list);
>
> ...
>
> if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
> __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
> else
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(bus->self);
>
> For two reasons: (1) test the same condition both places, and (2) be a
> little more explicit about the scenario (and "bus->self == NULL" also
> happens for the virtual buses added for SR-IOV).
works for me, tested with:
1: hotplug on root bus with QEMU's 'pc' machine,
2: (q35 machine) igb emulation, and adding VFs once guest is booted
3: BusCheck on missing PCI device (aka simulated env of reporter)
4: (q35 machine) resource re-allocation still works on root ports when
a device with large BARs is hotplugged
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.39.3
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 04:42:51PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I would expect hot-add to be handled via a Bus Check to the *parent*
> of a new device, so the device tree would only need to describe
> hardware that's present at boot. That would mean pci_root.c would
> have some .notify() handler, but I don't see anything there.
That has a big performance cost though - OSPM has no way to figure out
on which slot the new device is, so has to rescan the whole bus.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 02:44:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 16:50:09 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 11:32:16AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:41:02 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > > Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> > > > > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > > > > which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> > > > > when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> > > > > bridge associated.
> > > > > 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> > > > > (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> > > > > 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> > > > > existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> > > > > endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> > > > > without bridge assigned to it.
> > > 2: last round of logs with debug patch /before 40613da5, with 40613da5, and after/
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
> > >
> > > here dmesg shows 1st correct port
> > > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP03: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 000000000dad0b34
> > > and then later on
> > > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP07: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
> > > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP08: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
> > > which aren't recognized as bridge
> >
> > Thanks, that does seem a little suspect. ACPI r6.5 sec 5.6.6 says
> > that when OSPM handles a Bus Check, it should "perform a Plug and Play
> > re-enumeration operation on the device tree starting from the point
> > where it has been notified."
> >
> > PCI devices are enumerated by doing PCI config reads. It would make
> > sense to re-enumerate a PCI hierarchy starting with a PCI device
> > that's already known to the OS, e.g., by scanning the secondary bus of
> > a PCI-to-PCI bridge.
> >
> > I think there are two problems here:
> >
> > 1) The platform shouldn't send a Bus Check notification to a PCI
> > device that doesn't exist. How could the OS re-enumerate
> > starting there?
>
> in case of reported laptop, DSDT provides Device Descriptors
> for not existing root-ports.
>
> OSPM can't do anything with it but to pass Notify event to
> PCI bus-specific enumeration mechanism, and it's upto PCI subsystem
> to discard/ignore Notify() on this ACPI node.
That seems backwards to me, but we have a fair bit of ACPI and PCI
stuff that's backwards.
> > 2) Linux runs acpiphp_hotplug_notify() for Bus Checks to
> > non-existent PCI devices when it ignore them; reasoning below.
> >
> > We call acpiphp_enumerate_slots() in this path, which happens before
> > any of the PCI devices on the root bus have been enumerated:
> >
> > pci_register_host_bridge
> > pcibios_add_bus(root bus)
> > acpi_pci_add_bus
> > acpiphp_enumerate_slots(pci_bus *bus)
> > acpi_walk_namespace(acpiphp_add_context)
> > acpiphp_add_context(struct acpiphp_bridge *)
> > acpi_evaluate_integer("_ADR")
> > acpiphp_init_context
> > context->hp.notify = acpiphp_hotplug_notify
> >
> > So now we've already looked at RP03, RP07, and RP08, and set up the
> > .notify() handler for all of them. Since we haven't scanned the bus
> > yet, we don't know that RP03 exists and RP07 and RP08 do not.
>
> While ACPI doesn't forbid firmware to describe non-existing RP,
> the PCIe hostbridge can't hotplug extra root ports. (and QEMU
> follows PCIe design in this respect on 'q35' machine).
>
> However when it comes to hotplug on QEMU's 'pc' machine
> (hotplug on root bus), each slot has "Augmented Device
> Descriptors", that includes un-populated slots leading to
> the presence of .notify() handler on such slots.
>
> Then later on when device is hotplugged, a Notify(,1/*DeviceCheck*/)
> is sent to previously empty slot and from there on PCI subsystem
> re-enumerates either a single device or a bridge hierarchy
> (from the parent context).
>
> So I'd assume that we need to have .notify() handler for all slots
> that are described in DSDT (present and non present).
Just from a "beautiful design" perspective, it seems suboptimal for
the ACPI device tree to have to include Device objects for all
possible hot-added devices.
I would expect hot-add to be handled via a Bus Check to the *parent*
of a new device, so the device tree would only need to describe
hardware that's present at boot. That would mean pci_root.c would
have some .notify() handler, but I don't see anything there.
I don't know if platforms really implement Root Port hot-add (maybe
qemu?), but if they do, I could believe they might do it via Notify to
an ACPI Device for a non-present hardware device. I wouldn't know
whether that's the intent of the spec, or just a reaction to something
that happened to work with existing OSes.
> > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc -m 512M -monitor stdio -cpu host --enable-kvm -kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage -drive format=raw,file=ubuntu.img -append "root=/dev/sda1"
> > (qemu) device_add e1000
> >
> > (For posterity, replacing "-monitor stdio" with "-nographic -monitor
> > telnet:localhost:7001,server,nowait,nodelay" and adding
> > "console=ttyS0,115200n8" to the -append made it easier to see the
> > crash details.)
>
> I've not put extra arguments, because there is a lot of ways
> one can configure/use monitor/serial options.
>
> But specifying full command line like yours will be useful
> for anyone who doesn't have any experience with QEMU CLI.
Yep, that's the audience :) I want to make it as easy as reasonably
possible for non-qemu experts to repro things.
> > I really wish we didn't have such different resource assignment paths
> > depending on whether the device is on a root bus or deeper in the
> > hierarchy. But we can't fix that now, so this seems like the right
> > thing.
>
> I've looked at possibility of making
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> work without bridge pointer, but it looks not viable as it's
> a bridge dedicated function which on top of rearranging
> resources, also disables/reprograms/enables bridge.
>
> If there are ideas how to make it better,
> I can pick it up and try to implement.
>
> Testing shows that pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> isn't ideal since it releases all resources before reassigning
> and then if the later fails bridge stays in mis-configured
> state (attempt to recover results in failing BAR assignment
> to children devices).
> It's not issue in case of
> root-port -> 1 child device hotplug
> since root port hadn't any working device[s] behind it.
> But in case of hotplug into PCI bridge, that leaves
> pre-existing devices behind the bridge broken (SHPC and acpiphp case).
Yeah, it's a complicated mess. That's why I didn't think this would
be a viable fix in the short term.
Bjorn
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:54:21 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 04:42:51PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I would expect hot-add to be handled via a Bus Check to the *parent*
> > of a new device, so the device tree would only need to describe
> > hardware that's present at boot. That would mean pci_root.c would
> > have some .notify() handler, but I don't see anything there.
>
> That has a big performance cost though - OSPM has no way to figure out
> on which slot the new device is, so has to rescan the whole bus.
>
Spec says following about OSPM receiving DeviceCheck
ACPI6.5r 5.6.6 Device Object Notifications) "
If the device has appeared, OSPM will re-enumerate from the parent.
If the device has disappeared, OSPM will invalidate the state of the device.
OSPM may optimize out re-enumeration.
...
If the device is a bridge, OSPM _may_ re-enumerate the bridge and the child bus.
"
The later statement is was added somewhere after 1.0b spec.
According to debug logs when I was testing that hotplug still works
I saw 're-enumerate from the parent', behavior. So there is space
to optimize if there would be demand for that. And 6.5 spec
has 'Device Light Check', though using that would require some
ugly juggling with checking supported revisions & co which were
never reliable in practice.
I don't know what Windows does in that case.
However if one has deep hierarchy, a BusCheck shall cause
expensive deep scan. While for DeviceCheck it's optional 'may',
and even that may is vague enough that one can read it as
if it's 'a new bridge' then scan behind it while one can ignore
existing bridge if it isn't DeviceCheck target.
Regardless of that we can't just switch to BusCheck exclusively
without harming existing setups which can legitimately use both
methods.
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:54:21 -0400
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 04:42:51PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > I would expect hot-add to be handled via a Bus Check to the *parent*
> > > of a new device, so the device tree would only need to describe
> > > hardware that's present at boot. That would mean pci_root.c would
> > > have some .notify() handler, but I don't see anything there.
> >
> > That has a big performance cost though - OSPM has no way to figure out
> > on which slot the new device is, so has to rescan the whole bus.
> >
>
> Spec says following about OSPM receiving DeviceCheck
> ACPI6.5r 5.6.6 Device Object Notifications) "
> If the device has appeared, OSPM will re-enumerate from the parent.
> If the device has disappeared, OSPM will invalidate the state of the device.
> OSPM may optimize out re-enumeration.
> ...
> If the device is a bridge, OSPM _may_ re-enumerate the bridge and the child bus.
> "
> The later statement is was added somewhere after 1.0b spec.
>
> According to debug logs when I was testing that hotplug still works
> I saw 're-enumerate from the parent', behavior.
> So there is space
> to optimize if there would be demand for that.
Yes I was talking about unplug.
> And 6.5 spec
> has 'Device Light Check', though using that would require some
> ugly juggling with checking supported revisions & co which were
> never reliable in practice.
> I don't know what Windows does in that case.
>
> However if one has deep hierarchy, a BusCheck shall cause
> expensive deep scan. While for DeviceCheck it's optional 'may',
> and even that may is vague enough that one can read it as
> if it's 'a new bridge' then scan behind it while one can ignore
> existing bridge if it isn't DeviceCheck target.
And it's very clear that it's more efficient for removal.
> Regardless of that we can't just switch to BusCheck exclusively
> without harming existing setups which can legitimately use both
> methods.
--
MST
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:42:51 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
Is there anything else for me to do to make this merged?
(just checked recent branches in pci tree, and
'Revert "PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary'
is still there)
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 02:44:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 16:50:09 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 11:32:16AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:41:02 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > > > Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> > > > > > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > > > > > which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> > > > > > when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> > > > > > bridge associated.
> > > > > > 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> > > > > > (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> > > > > > 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> > > > > > existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> > > > > > endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> > > > > > without bridge assigned to it.
>
> > > > 2: last round of logs with debug patch /before 40613da5, with 40613da5, and after/
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
> > > >
> > > > here dmesg shows 1st correct port
> > > > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP03: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 000000000dad0b34
> > > > and then later on
> > > > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP07: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
> > > > ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP08: acpiphp_glue: Bus check in hotplug_event(): bridge: 0000000000000000
> > > > which aren't recognized as bridge
> > >
> > > Thanks, that does seem a little suspect. ACPI r6.5 sec 5.6.6 says
> > > that when OSPM handles a Bus Check, it should "perform a Plug and Play
> > > re-enumeration operation on the device tree starting from the point
> > > where it has been notified."
> > >
> > > PCI devices are enumerated by doing PCI config reads. It would make
> > > sense to re-enumerate a PCI hierarchy starting with a PCI device
> > > that's already known to the OS, e.g., by scanning the secondary bus of
> > > a PCI-to-PCI bridge.
> > >
> > > I think there are two problems here:
> > >
> > > 1) The platform shouldn't send a Bus Check notification to a PCI
> > > device that doesn't exist. How could the OS re-enumerate
> > > starting there?
> >
> > in case of reported laptop, DSDT provides Device Descriptors
> > for not existing root-ports.
> >
> > OSPM can't do anything with it but to pass Notify event to
> > PCI bus-specific enumeration mechanism, and it's upto PCI subsystem
> > to discard/ignore Notify() on this ACPI node.
>
> That seems backwards to me, but we have a fair bit of ACPI and PCI
> stuff that's backwards.
>
> > > 2) Linux runs acpiphp_hotplug_notify() for Bus Checks to
> > > non-existent PCI devices when it ignore them; reasoning below.
> > >
> > > We call acpiphp_enumerate_slots() in this path, which happens before
> > > any of the PCI devices on the root bus have been enumerated:
> > >
> > > pci_register_host_bridge
> > > pcibios_add_bus(root bus)
> > > acpi_pci_add_bus
> > > acpiphp_enumerate_slots(pci_bus *bus)
> > > acpi_walk_namespace(acpiphp_add_context)
> > > acpiphp_add_context(struct acpiphp_bridge *)
> > > acpi_evaluate_integer("_ADR")
> > > acpiphp_init_context
> > > context->hp.notify = acpiphp_hotplug_notify
> > >
> > > So now we've already looked at RP03, RP07, and RP08, and set up the
> > > .notify() handler for all of them. Since we haven't scanned the bus
> > > yet, we don't know that RP03 exists and RP07 and RP08 do not.
> >
> > While ACPI doesn't forbid firmware to describe non-existing RP,
> > the PCIe hostbridge can't hotplug extra root ports. (and QEMU
> > follows PCIe design in this respect on 'q35' machine).
> >
> > However when it comes to hotplug on QEMU's 'pc' machine
> > (hotplug on root bus), each slot has "Augmented Device
> > Descriptors", that includes un-populated slots leading to
> > the presence of .notify() handler on such slots.
> >
> > Then later on when device is hotplugged, a Notify(,1/*DeviceCheck*/)
> > is sent to previously empty slot and from there on PCI subsystem
> > re-enumerates either a single device or a bridge hierarchy
> > (from the parent context).
> >
> > So I'd assume that we need to have .notify() handler for all slots
> > that are described in DSDT (present and non present).
>
> Just from a "beautiful design" perspective, it seems suboptimal for
> the ACPI device tree to have to include Device objects for all
> possible hot-added devices.
>
> I would expect hot-add to be handled via a Bus Check to the *parent*
> of a new device, so the device tree would only need to describe
> hardware that's present at boot. That would mean pci_root.c would
> have some .notify() handler, but I don't see anything there.
>
> I don't know if platforms really implement Root Port hot-add (maybe
> qemu?), but if they do, I could believe they might do it via Notify to
> an ACPI Device for a non-present hardware device. I wouldn't know
> whether that's the intent of the spec, or just a reaction to something
> that happened to work with existing OSes.
>
> > > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc -m 512M -monitor stdio -cpu host --enable-kvm -kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage -drive format=raw,file=ubuntu.img -append "root=/dev/sda1"
> > > (qemu) device_add e1000
> > >
> > > (For posterity, replacing "-monitor stdio" with "-nographic -monitor
> > > telnet:localhost:7001,server,nowait,nodelay" and adding
> > > "console=ttyS0,115200n8" to the -append made it easier to see the
> > > crash details.)
> >
> > I've not put extra arguments, because there is a lot of ways
> > one can configure/use monitor/serial options.
> >
> > But specifying full command line like yours will be useful
> > for anyone who doesn't have any experience with QEMU CLI.
>
> Yep, that's the audience :) I want to make it as easy as reasonably
> possible for non-qemu experts to repro things.
>
> > > I really wish we didn't have such different resource assignment paths
> > > depending on whether the device is on a root bus or deeper in the
> > > hierarchy. But we can't fix that now, so this seems like the right
> > > thing.
> >
> > I've looked at possibility of making
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > work without bridge pointer, but it looks not viable as it's
> > a bridge dedicated function which on top of rearranging
> > resources, also disables/reprograms/enables bridge.
> >
> > If there are ideas how to make it better,
> > I can pick it up and try to implement.
> >
> > Testing shows that pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > isn't ideal since it releases all resources before reassigning
> > and then if the later fails bridge stays in mis-configured
> > state (attempt to recover results in failing BAR assignment
> > to children devices).
> > It's not issue in case of
> > root-port -> 1 child device hotplug
> > since root port hadn't any working device[s] behind it.
> > But in case of hotplug into PCI bridge, that leaves
> > pre-existing devices behind the bridge broken (SHPC and acpiphp case).
>
> Yeah, it's a complicated mess. That's why I didn't think this would
> be a viable fix in the short term.
>
> Bjorn
>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> bridge associated.
acpiphp is *always* in use if we get to enable_slot(), so that doesn't
really add information here.
> 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> without bridge assigned to it.
IIUC, the Inspiron problem happens when:
- acpiphp_context->bridge is NULL, so hotplug_event() calls
enable_slot() instead of acpiphp_check_bridge(), AND
- acpiphp_slot->bus->self is also NULL, because enable_slot() calls
pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() with that NULL pointer,
which dereferences "bridge->subordinate"
But I can't figure out why acpiphp_context->bridge is NULL for RP07
and RP08 (which don't exist), but not for RP03 (which does).
I guess all the acpiphp_contexts (RP03, RP07, RP08) must be allocated in
acpiphp_add_context() by acpiphp_init_context().
Woody's lspci from [1] shows only one Root Port:
00:1c.0 Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #3
The DSDT.DSL includes:
Device (RP01) _ADR 0x001C0000 # 1c.0
Device (RP02) _ADR 0x001C0001 # 1c.1
Device (RP03) _ADR 0x001C0002 # 1c.2
Device (RP04) _ADR 0x001C0003 # 1c.3
Device (RP05) _ADR 0x001C0004 # 1c.4
Device (RP06) _ADR 0x001C0005 # 1c.5
Device (RP07) _ADR 0x001C0006 # 1c.6
Device (RP08) _ADR 0x001C0007 # 1c.7
I can see why we might need a Bus Check after resume to see if
something got added while we were suspended. But I don't see why we
handle RP03 differently from RP07 and RP08.
Can you help me out? I'm lost in a maze of twisty passages, all
alike.
Bjorn
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 18:27:09 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> > when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> > bridge associated.
>
> acpiphp is *always* in use if we get to enable_slot(), so that doesn't
> really add information here.
>
> > 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> > (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> > 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> > existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> > endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> > without bridge assigned to it.
how about following commit message (incorporating all feed back in this thread):
-- cut --
Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
which depends on bridge being available, however in case
when acpiphp is enabled [2], enable_slot() can be called without
bridge associated.
1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
(widely used in virt world)
2. a (misbehaving) firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events
to non existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0),
which endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0)
where bus has not bridge assigned to it.
acpihp doesn't know that it's a bridge, and bus specific
'PCI subsystem' can't argument ACPI context with bridge
information since the PCI device to get this data from
is/was not available.
Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine, which supports
PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. To reproduce boot kernel at
commit [1] in VM started with following CLI (assuming guest root fs
is installed on sda1 partition):
# qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc -m 1G -enable-kvm -cpu host \
-monitor stdio -serial file:serial.log \
-kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage \
-append "root=/dev/sda1 console=ttyS0" \
guest_disk.img
once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
(qemu) device_add e1000
(check serial.log) it will cause NULL pointer dereference at:
void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
{
struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
[ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
[...]
[ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
[ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
[ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
[ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
[ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
[ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
[ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
[ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
[ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
[ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
[ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
following sequence:
1. suspend to RAM
2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() as we used to do
but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
(to cover for the case of ACPI event on hostbridge or
non existing root port).
That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
and at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
1)
Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
2) CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI=y
-- cut --
if commit message is looking acceptable to you, I can respin
amended patch with your suggestions taken in account.
> IIUC, the Inspiron problem happens when:
>
> - acpiphp_context->bridge is NULL, so hotplug_event() calls
> enable_slot() instead of acpiphp_check_bridge(), AND
>
> - acpiphp_slot->bus->self is also NULL, because enable_slot() calls
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() with that NULL pointer,
> which dereferences "bridge->subordinate"
>
> But I can't figure out why acpiphp_context->bridge is NULL for RP07
> and RP08 (which don't exist), but not for RP03 (which does).
>
> I guess all the acpiphp_contexts (RP03, RP07, RP08) must be allocated in
> acpiphp_add_context() by acpiphp_init_context().
>
> Woody's lspci from [1] shows only one Root Port:
>
> 00:1c.0 Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #3
>
> The DSDT.DSL includes:
>
> Device (RP01) _ADR 0x001C0000 # 1c.0
> Device (RP02) _ADR 0x001C0001 # 1c.1
> Device (RP03) _ADR 0x001C0002 # 1c.2
> Device (RP04) _ADR 0x001C0003 # 1c.3
> Device (RP05) _ADR 0x001C0004 # 1c.4
> Device (RP06) _ADR 0x001C0005 # 1c.5
> Device (RP07) _ADR 0x001C0006 # 1c.6
> Device (RP08) _ADR 0x001C0007 # 1c.7
>
> I can see why we might need a Bus Check after resume to see if
> something got added while we were suspended. But I don't see why we
> handle RP03 differently from RP07 and RP08.
>
> Can you help me out? I'm lost in a maze of twisty passages, all
> alike.
I'll try to trace call path and see where it leads
(based on a guess in updated commit message: OS/nor ACPI
has info if it's bridge when the device didn't exists
during boot).
(though, I don't think it should hold this patch.
while it would be good to understand where bridge
gets added in acpi context, it's not directly relevant
to the fixing hotplug on hostbridge and buscheck events
on non-existing root-ports)
> Bjorn
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 18:27:09 -0500
> Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> > > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > > which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> > > when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> > > bridge associated.
> >
> > acpiphp is *always* in use if we get to enable_slot(), so that doesn't
> > really add information here.
> >
> > > 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> > > (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> > > 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> > > existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> > > endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> > > without bridge assigned to it.
>
> how about following commit message (incorporating all feed back in this thread):
I incorporated this commit log and put the patch on for-linus for
v6.5. I think the patch is fine, and we can amend the commit log
again if necessary.
> -- cut --
> Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> which depends on bridge being available, however in case
> when acpiphp is enabled [2], enable_slot() can be called without
> bridge associated.
> 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> (widely used in virt world)
> 2. a (misbehaving) firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events
> to non existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0),
> which endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0)
> where bus has not bridge assigned to it.
> acpihp doesn't know that it's a bridge, and bus specific
> 'PCI subsystem' can't argument ACPI context with bridge
> information since the PCI device to get this data from
> is/was not available.
>
> Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine, which supports
> PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. To reproduce boot kernel at
> commit [1] in VM started with following CLI (assuming guest root fs
> is installed on sda1 partition):
>
> # qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc -m 1G -enable-kvm -cpu host \
> -monitor stdio -serial file:serial.log \
> -kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage \
> -append "root=/dev/sda1 console=ttyS0" \
> guest_disk.img
>
> once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
>
> (qemu) device_add e1000
>
> (check serial.log) it will cause NULL pointer dereference at:
>
> void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> {
> struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
>
> [ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> [...]
> [ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
> [ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
> [ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
> [ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
> [ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
> [ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
> [ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
> [ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
> [ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
> [ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
> [ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
>
> The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> following sequence:
> 1. suspend to RAM
> 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
>
> Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() as we used to do
> but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
> (to cover for the case of ACPI event on hostbridge or
> non existing root port).
>
> That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
> and at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
> root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
>
> 1)
> Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
> 2) CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI=y
>
> -- cut --
>
> if commit message is looking acceptable to you, I can respin
> amended patch with your suggestions taken in account.
>
> > IIUC, the Inspiron problem happens when:
> >
> > - acpiphp_context->bridge is NULL, so hotplug_event() calls
> > enable_slot() instead of acpiphp_check_bridge(), AND
> >
> > - acpiphp_slot->bus->self is also NULL, because enable_slot() calls
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() with that NULL pointer,
> > which dereferences "bridge->subordinate"
> >
> > But I can't figure out why acpiphp_context->bridge is NULL for RP07
> > and RP08 (which don't exist), but not for RP03 (which does).
> >
> > I guess all the acpiphp_contexts (RP03, RP07, RP08) must be allocated in
> > acpiphp_add_context() by acpiphp_init_context().
> >
> > Woody's lspci from [1] shows only one Root Port:
> >
> > 00:1c.0 Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #3
> >
> > The DSDT.DSL includes:
> >
> > Device (RP01) _ADR 0x001C0000 # 1c.0
> > Device (RP02) _ADR 0x001C0001 # 1c.1
> > Device (RP03) _ADR 0x001C0002 # 1c.2
> > Device (RP04) _ADR 0x001C0003 # 1c.3
> > Device (RP05) _ADR 0x001C0004 # 1c.4
> > Device (RP06) _ADR 0x001C0005 # 1c.5
> > Device (RP07) _ADR 0x001C0006 # 1c.6
> > Device (RP08) _ADR 0x001C0007 # 1c.7
> >
> > I can see why we might need a Bus Check after resume to see if
> > something got added while we were suspended. But I don't see why we
> > handle RP03 differently from RP07 and RP08.
> >
> > Can you help me out? I'm lost in a maze of twisty passages, all
> > alike.
>
> I'll try to trace call path and see where it leads
> (based on a guess in updated commit message: OS/nor ACPI
> has info if it's bridge when the device didn't exists
> during boot).
>
> (though, I don't think it should hold this patch.
> while it would be good to understand where bridge
> gets added in acpi context, it's not directly relevant
> to the fixing hotplug on hostbridge and buscheck events
> on non-existing root-ports)
>
> > Bjorn
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> >
>
>
On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 12:28:52 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 18:27:09 -0500
> > Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> > > > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > > > which depends on bridge being available, however in some cases
> > > > when acpiphp is in use, enable_slot() can get a slot without
> > > > bridge associated.
> > >
> > > acpiphp is *always* in use if we get to enable_slot(), so that doesn't
> > > really add information here.
> > >
> > > > 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> > > > (likely not exiting on real hw, but widely used in virt world)
> > > > 2. broken firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events to non
> > > > existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0), which somehow
> > > > endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0) and with bus
> > > > without bridge assigned to it.
> >
> > how about following commit message (incorporating all feed back in this thread):
>
> I incorporated this commit log and put the patch on for-linus for
> v6.5. I think the patch is fine, and we can amend the commit log
> again if necessary.
Thanks!
See below notes on present vs non-present root-ports.
> > -- cut --
> > Commit [1] switched acpiphp hotplug to use
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources()
> > which depends on bridge being available, however in case
> > when acpiphp is enabled [2], enable_slot() can be called without
> > bridge associated.
> > 1. legitimate case of hotplug on root bus
> > (widely used in virt world)
> > 2. a (misbehaving) firmware, that sends 'Bus check' events
> > to non existing root ports (Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0),
> > which endup at acpiphp:enable_slot(..., bridge = 0)
> > where bus has not bridge assigned to it.
> > acpihp doesn't know that it's a bridge, and bus specific
> > 'PCI subsystem' can't argument ACPI context with bridge
> > information since the PCI device to get this data from
> > is/was not available.
> >
> > Issue is easy to reproduce with QEMU's 'pc' machine, which supports
> > PCI hotplug on hostbridge slots. To reproduce boot kernel at
> > commit [1] in VM started with following CLI (assuming guest root fs
> > is installed on sda1 partition):
> >
> > # qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc -m 1G -enable-kvm -cpu host \
> > -monitor stdio -serial file:serial.log \
> > -kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage \
> > -append "root=/dev/sda1 console=ttyS0" \
> > guest_disk.img
> >
> > once guest OS is fully booted at qemu prompt:
> >
> > (qemu) device_add e1000
> >
> > (check serial.log) it will cause NULL pointer dereference at:
> >
> > void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> > {
> > struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
> >
> > [ 612.277651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> > [...]
> > [ 612.277798] ? pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources+0x1f/0x260
> > [ 612.277804] ? pcibios_allocate_dev_resources+0x3c/0x2a0
> > [ 612.277809] enable_slot+0x21f/0x3e0
> > [ 612.277816] acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x13d/0x260
> > [ 612.277822] ? __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> > [ 612.277827] acpi_device_hotplug+0xbc/0x540
> > [ 612.277834] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x15/0x20
> > [ 612.277839] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x370
> > [ 612.277845] worker_thread+0x45/0x3b0
> > [ 612.277850] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> > [ 612.277854] kthread+0xdc/0x110
> > [ 612.277860] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > [ 612.277866] ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40
> > [ 612.277871] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > [ 612.277876] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
> >
> > The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> > following sequence:
> > 1. suspend to RAM
> > 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> > 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
> >
> > Fix it by using __pci_bus_assign_resources() instead of
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() as we used to do
> > but only in case when bus doesn't have a bridge associated
> > (to cover for the case of ACPI event on hostbridge or
> > non existing root port).
> >
> > That let us keep hotplug on root bus working like it used to be
> > and at the same time keeps resource reassignment usable on
> > root ports (and other 1st level bridges) that was fixed by [1].
> >
> > 1)
> > Fixes: 40613da52b13 ("PCI: acpiphp: Reassign resources on bridge if necessary")
> > 2) CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI=y
> >
> > -- cut --
> >
> > if commit message is looking acceptable to you, I can respin
> > amended patch with your suggestions taken in account.
> >
> > > IIUC, the Inspiron problem happens when:
> > >
> > > - acpiphp_context->bridge is NULL, so hotplug_event() calls
> > > enable_slot() instead of acpiphp_check_bridge(), AND
> > >
> > > - acpiphp_slot->bus->self is also NULL, because enable_slot() calls
> > > pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() with that NULL pointer,
> > > which dereferences "bridge->subordinate"
> > >
> > > But I can't figure out why acpiphp_context->bridge is NULL for RP07
> > > and RP08 (which don't exist), but not for RP03 (which does).
> > >
> > > I guess all the acpiphp_contexts (RP03, RP07, RP08) must be allocated in
> > > acpiphp_add_context() by acpiphp_init_context().
> > >
> > > Woody's lspci from [1] shows only one Root Port:
> > >
> > > 00:1c.0 Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #3
> > >
> > > The DSDT.DSL includes:
> > >
> > > Device (RP01) _ADR 0x001C0000 # 1c.0
> > > Device (RP02) _ADR 0x001C0001 # 1c.1
> > > Device (RP03) _ADR 0x001C0002 # 1c.2
> > > Device (RP04) _ADR 0x001C0003 # 1c.3
> > > Device (RP05) _ADR 0x001C0004 # 1c.4
> > > Device (RP06) _ADR 0x001C0005 # 1c.5
> > > Device (RP07) _ADR 0x001C0006 # 1c.6
> > > Device (RP08) _ADR 0x001C0007 # 1c.7
> > >
> > > I can see why we might need a Bus Check after resume to see if
> > > something got added while we were suspended. But I don't see why we
> > > handle RP03 differently from RP07 and RP08.
[...]
Looks like I was correct in my assumption:
ACPI descriptor doesn't distinguish between PCI devices vs bridges.
PCI code enumerates host-bridge first:
acpiphp_enumerate_slots
acpi_pci_add_bus+0x55/0xf0
pci_register_host_bridge+0x230/0x510
pci_create_root_bus+0x86/0xb0
acpi_pci_root_create+0x182/0x2e0
that creates acpi context for direct children, after that
later within acpi_pci_root_create(), pci_scan_child_bus()
is called:
acpiphp_enumerate_slots+0x1f/0x2b0
acpi_pci_add_bus+0x55/0xf0
pci_add_new_bus+0x25c/0x4b0
pci_scan_bridge_extend+0x655/0x6a0
pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0xc7/0x290
acpi_pci_root_create+0x262/0x2e0
which does brute force scan for present devices and if a device is a bridge
it initializes new bus, slot[s] (incl. acpi context with bridge) ...
While for non existing root-port, acpi context created by the 1st
acpiphp_enumerate_slots() called from host-bridge is only abstract
acpi device handle (kernel doesn't have sufficient data to do anything with it).
So it effectively degrades to hotplug on host-bridge, and enable_slot(...,false)
would try to bring up all new devices in slot/bus.
Where it gets confusing is that DSDT says that native
PCIe hotplug should be used and dmesg confirms that.
But commit 84c8b58ed3add indicates that both hotplug
methods could be used at the same time sometimes.
I'm not sure how that is supposed to work.
> > > Bjorn
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> > >
> >
> >
>
Hello.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov <[email protected]> wrote:
> The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> following sequence:
> 1. suspend to RAM
> 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
My Dell laptop suffers this since v6.5-rc1.
I've found this thread because of the same call stack triggering the
NULL ptr dereference I captured on my machine.
I applied this patch and resume works as before and I have observed no
issues during typical usage.
I'd be glad if a fix like this makes it into the next -rc.
Feel free to add
Tested-by: Michal Koutn? <[email protected]>
Thanks for looking into this,
Michal
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 11:25:06AM +0200, Michal Koutn? wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:18PM +0200, Igor Mammedov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The issue was discovered on Dell Inspiron 7352/0W6WV0 laptop with
> > following sequence:
> > 1. suspend to RAM
> > 2. wake up with the same backtrace being observed:
> > 3. 2nd suspend to RAM attempt makes laptop freeze
>
> My Dell laptop suffers this since v6.5-rc1.
> I've found this thread because of the same call stack triggering the
> NULL ptr dereference I captured on my machine.
>
> I applied this patch and resume works as before and I have observed no
> issues during typical usage.
>
> I'd be glad if a fix like this makes it into the next -rc.
> Feel free to add
>
> Tested-by: Michal Koutn? <[email protected]>
Added tested-by for both you and Woody, thank you very much! This
should appear in -rc6.
Bjorn