kasan_mem_to_shadow translates virtual addresses to kasan shadow
addresses whereas for_each_mem_range returns physical addresses: it is
then required to use __va on those addresses before passing them to
kasan_mem_to_shadow.
Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
---
arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
index 4b9149f963d3..6d3b88f2c566 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
@@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
(void *)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END));
for_each_mem_range(i, &_start, &_end) {
- void *start = (void *)_start;
- void *end = (void *)_end;
+ void *start = (void *)__va(_start);
+ void *end = (void *)__va(_end);
if (start >= end)
break;
--
2.20.1
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:07:34 PST (-0800), [email protected] wrote:
> kasan_mem_to_shadow translates virtual addresses to kasan shadow
> addresses whereas for_each_mem_range returns physical addresses: it is
> then required to use __va on those addresses before passing them to
> kasan_mem_to_shadow.
>
> Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()")
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
> index 4b9149f963d3..6d3b88f2c566 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> (void *)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END));
>
> for_each_mem_range(i, &_start, &_end) {
> - void *start = (void *)_start;
> - void *end = (void *)_end;
> + void *start = (void *)__va(_start);
> + void *end = (void *)__va(_end);
>
> if (start >= end)
> break;
Thanks, but unless I'm missing something this is already in Linus' tree as
c25a053e1577 ("riscv: Fix KASAN memory mapping.").
Hi Palmer,
Le 2/22/21 ? 9:58 PM, Palmer Dabbelt a ?crit?:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:07:34 PST (-0800), [email protected] wrote:
>> kasan_mem_to_shadow translates virtual addresses to kasan shadow
>> addresses whereas for_each_mem_range returns physical addresses: it is
>> then required to use __va on those addresses before passing them to
>> kasan_mem_to_shadow.
>>
>> Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with
>> for_each_mem_range()")
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> ?arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c | 4 ++--
>> ?1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
>> index 4b9149f963d3..6d3b88f2c566 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
>> @@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
>> ???????????? (void *)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END));
>>
>> ???? for_each_mem_range(i, &_start, &_end) {
>> -??????? void *start = (void *)_start;
>> -??????? void *end = (void *)_end;
>> +??????? void *start = (void *)__va(_start);
>> +??????? void *end = (void *)__va(_end);
>>
>> ???????? if (start >= end)
>> ???????????? break;
>
> Thanks, but unless I'm missing something this is already in Linus' tree as
> c25a053e1577 ("riscv: Fix KASAN memory mapping.").
You're right, I missed this one: but for some reasons, this patch does
not appear in for-next.
Thanks,
Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv