HEY! andmike and patmans of @us.ibm.com YOU FUCKED UP.
For two weeks in a row you have submitted code that deliberately
breaks scsi drivers.
Could you spell out your master plan for everyone who isn't using
IBfuckingM sanctioned hardware.
>From Patrick's proposed patches for lower level changes crap.
drivers/scsi/inia100.c: In function `inia100_biosparam':
drivers/scsi/inia100.c:661: structure has no member named `host'
drivers/scsi/inia100.c:662: structure has no member named `id'
drivers/scsi/inia100.c:659: warning: `pTcb' might be used uninitialized in
this function
There are more than 3 SCSI drivers in the linux kernel and you need to fix
all of them instead of fucking N-3 of them.
Given that 99% of Linux users will never know WTF multi-pathed SCSI hosts
are, shouldn't you adjust your code to reflect this.
I am starting to remember all the reasons I hated IBM people, but then
along came the Oracle people.
mumble, mumble, it will be fixed in the next release,
mumble, mumble, it will be fixed in the next release,
mumble, mumble, it will be fixed in the next release,
mumble, mumble, it will be fixed in the next release,
mumble, mumble, it will be fixed in the next release,
Patrick, should I mention that the ('-1\t' * 9) could be
('-1\t' * 5) in sg.c, but 'suck my cock' would work as well.
enough bile for today,
cu johnf
On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 05:44, John W Fort wrote:
> HEY! andmike and patmans of @us.ibm.com YOU FUCKED UP.
>
> For two weeks in a row you have submitted code that deliberately
> breaks scsi drivers.
And I thought Australians prided themselves on their culture and humour.
You are well out of order, technically incorrect and not wanted. Try the
qmail lists, you'll fit in much better there
*plonk*