From: Wen Yang <[email protected]>
introduce a BUILD_BUG_ON to check that the EFD_SEMAPHORE is equal to its
definition in the uapi file, just like EFD_CLOEXEC and EFD_NONBLOCK.
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
fs/eventfd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/eventfd.c b/fs/eventfd.c
index 93848573c877..c1f5d71e7197 100644
--- a/fs/eventfd.c
+++ b/fs/eventfd.c
@@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ static int do_eventfd(unsigned int count, int flags)
/* Check the EFD_* constants for consistency. */
BUILD_BUG_ON(EFD_CLOEXEC != O_CLOEXEC);
BUILD_BUG_ON(EFD_NONBLOCK != O_NONBLOCK);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(EFD_SEMAPHORE != (1 << 0));
if (flags & ~EFD_FLAGS_SET)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.25.1
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 23:47:40 +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> introduce a BUILD_BUG_ON to check that the EFD_SEMAPHORE is equal to its
> definition in the uapi file, just like EFD_CLOEXEC and EFD_NONBLOCK.
>
>
This isn't hugely useful tbh but it's not terrible either.
---
Applied to the vfs.misc branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
Patches in the vfs.misc branch should appear in linux-next soon.
Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a
new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.
It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the
patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.
Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase,
trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
branch: vfs.misc
[1/1] eventfd: add a BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure consistency between EFD_SEMAPHORE and the uapi
https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/c3d48db389b7