This patchset addreses two problems with early loading on AMD.
First, feedback from Yinghai that find_ucode_in_initrd() should be
marked __init:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/4/695
And second, feedback from Henrique that Intel early loading supports
multiple microcode firmware concatenated together, whereas the current
AMD implementation lacks this support:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/31/4
V3:
* style fix -- reduce multiple if statements into a single one
V2:
* test for !initrd_start before using it
* use __pa() instead of __pa_nodebug() on AP load
* fixed calculation of start offset and size of the microcode container file
Jacob Shin (2):
x86/microcode/amd: make find_ucode_in_initrd() __init
x86/microcode/amd: allow multiple families' bin files appended
together
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.5
Change find_ucode_in_initrd() to __init and only let BSP call it
during cold boot. This is the right thing to do because only BSP will
see initrd loaded by the boot loader. APs will offset into
initrd_start to find the microcode patch binary.
Reported-by: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
index 9618805..c783248 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/earlycpio.h>
+#include <linux/initrd.h>
#include <asm/cpu.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
@@ -16,40 +17,59 @@
static bool ucode_loaded;
static u32 ucode_new_rev;
+static unsigned long ucode_offset;
+static size_t ucode_size;
/*
* Microcode patch container file is prepended to the initrd in cpio format.
* See Documentation/x86/early-microcode.txt
*/
-static __cpuinitdata char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin";
+static __initdata char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin";
-static struct cpio_data __cpuinit find_ucode_in_initrd(void)
+static struct cpio_data __init find_ucode_in_initrd(void)
{
long offset = 0;
+ char *path;
+ void *start;
+ size_t size;
+ unsigned long *uoffset;
+ size_t *usize;
struct cpio_data cd;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ struct boot_params *p;
+
/*
* On 32-bit, early load occurs before paging is turned on so we need
* to use physical addresses.
*/
- if (!(read_cr0() & X86_CR0_PG)) {
- struct boot_params *p;
- p = (struct boot_params *)__pa_nodebug(&boot_params);
- cd = find_cpio_data((char *)__pa_nodebug(ucode_path),
- (void *)p->hdr.ramdisk_image, p->hdr.ramdisk_size,
- &offset);
- } else
+ p = (struct boot_params *)__pa_nodebug(&boot_params);
+ path = (char *)__pa_nodebug(ucode_path);
+ start = (void *)p->hdr.ramdisk_image;
+ size = p->hdr.ramdisk_size;
+ uoffset = (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_offset);
+ usize = (size_t *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_size);
+#else
+ path = ucode_path;
+ start = (void *)(boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_image + PAGE_OFFSET);
+ size = boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_size;
+ uoffset = &ucode_offset;
+ usize = &ucode_size;
#endif
- cd = find_cpio_data(ucode_path,
- (void *)(boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_image + PAGE_OFFSET),
- boot_params.hdr.ramdisk_size, &offset);
+
+ cd = find_cpio_data(path, start, size, &offset);
+ if (!cd.data)
+ return cd;
if (*(u32 *)cd.data != UCODE_MAGIC) {
cd.data = NULL;
cd.size = 0;
+ return cd;
}
+ *uoffset = (u8 *)cd.data - (u8 *)start;
+ *usize = cd.size;
+
return cd;
}
@@ -62,9 +82,8 @@ static struct cpio_data __cpuinit find_ucode_in_initrd(void)
* load_microcode_amd() to save equivalent cpu table and microcode patches in
* kernel heap memory.
*/
-static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void)
+static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
{
- struct cpio_data cd;
struct equiv_cpu_entry *eq;
u32 *header;
u8 *data;
@@ -78,12 +97,9 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void)
#else
new_rev = &ucode_new_rev;
#endif
- cd = find_ucode_in_initrd();
- if (!cd.data)
- return;
- data = cd.data;
- left = cd.size;
+ data = ucode;
+ left = size;
header = (u32 *)data;
/* find equiv cpu table */
@@ -129,7 +145,11 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void)
void __init load_ucode_amd_bsp(void)
{
- apply_ucode_in_initrd();
+ struct cpio_data cd = find_ucode_in_initrd();
+ if (!cd.data)
+ return;
+
+ apply_ucode_in_initrd(cd.data, cd.size);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
@@ -145,12 +165,26 @@ u8 amd_bsp_mpb[MPB_MAX_SIZE];
void __cpuinit load_ucode_amd_ap(void)
{
struct microcode_amd *mc;
+ unsigned long *initrd;
+ unsigned long *uoffset;
+ size_t *usize;
+ void *ucode;
- mc = (struct microcode_amd *)__pa_nodebug(amd_bsp_mpb);
- if (mc->hdr.patch_id && mc->hdr.processor_rev_id)
+ mc = (struct microcode_amd *)__pa(amd_bsp_mpb);
+ if (mc->hdr.patch_id && mc->hdr.processor_rev_id) {
__apply_microcode_amd(mc);
- else
- apply_ucode_in_initrd();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ initrd = (unsigned long *)__pa(&initrd_start);
+ uoffset = (unsigned long *)__pa(&ucode_offset);
+ usize = (size_t *)__pa(&ucode_size);
+
+ if (!*usize || !*initrd)
+ return;
+
+ ucode = (void *)((unsigned long)__pa(*initrd) + *uoffset);
+ apply_ucode_in_initrd(ucode, *usize);
}
static void __init collect_cpu_sig_on_bsp(void *arg)
@@ -181,8 +215,13 @@ void __cpuinit load_ucode_amd_ap(void)
collect_cpu_info_amd_early(&cpu_data(cpu), ucode_cpu_info + cpu);
if (cpu && !ucode_loaded) {
- struct cpio_data cd = find_ucode_in_initrd();
- if (load_microcode_amd(0, cd.data, cd.size) != UCODE_OK)
+ void *ucode;
+
+ if (!ucode_size || !initrd_start)
+ return;
+
+ ucode = (void *)(initrd_start + ucode_offset);
+ if (load_microcode_amd(0, ucode, ucode_size) != UCODE_OK)
return;
ucode_loaded = true;
}
@@ -194,7 +233,7 @@ void __cpuinit load_ucode_amd_ap(void)
int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(void)
{
enum ucode_state ret;
- struct cpio_data cd;
+ void *ucode;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
unsigned int bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + bsp;
@@ -206,14 +245,11 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(void)
pr_info("microcode: updated early to new patch_level=0x%08x\n",
ucode_new_rev);
- if (ucode_loaded)
+ if (ucode_loaded || !ucode_size || !initrd_start)
return 0;
- cd = find_ucode_in_initrd();
- if (!cd.data)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- ret = load_microcode_amd(0, cd.data, cd.size);
+ ucode = (void *)(initrd_start + ucode_offset);
+ ret = load_microcode_amd(0, ucode, ucode_size);
if (ret != UCODE_OK)
return -EINVAL;
--
1.7.9.5
Add support for parsing through multiple families' microcode patch
container binary files appended together when early loading. This is
already supported on Intel.
Reported-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
index c783248..1ac6e9a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
@@ -87,15 +87,21 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
struct equiv_cpu_entry *eq;
u32 *header;
u8 *data;
- u16 eq_id;
+ u16 eq_id = 0;
int offset, left;
- u32 rev, dummy;
+ u32 rev, eax;
u32 *new_rev;
+ unsigned long *uoffset;
+ size_t *usize;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
new_rev = (u32 *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_new_rev);
+ uoffset = (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_offset);
+ usize = (size_t *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_size);
#else
new_rev = &ucode_new_rev;
+ uoffset = &ucode_offset;
+ usize = &ucode_size;
#endif
data = ucode;
@@ -108,18 +114,50 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
header[2] == 0) /* size */
return;
- eq = (struct equiv_cpu_entry *)(data + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ);
- offset = header[2] + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ;
- data += offset;
- left -= offset;
+ eax = cpuid_eax(0x00000001);
+
+ while (left > 0) {
+ eq = (struct equiv_cpu_entry *)(data + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ);
+
+ offset = header[2] + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ;
+ data += offset;
+ left -= offset;
- eq_id = find_equiv_id(eq, cpuid_eax(0x00000001));
- if (!eq_id)
+ eq_id = find_equiv_id(eq, eax);
+ if (eq_id)
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * support multiple container files appended together. if this
+ * one does not have a matching equivalent cpu entry, we fast
+ * forward to the next container file.
+ */
+ while (left > 0) {
+ header = (u32 *)data;
+ if (header[0] == UCODE_MAGIC &&
+ header[1] == UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE)
+ break;
+
+ offset = header[1] + SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
+ data += offset;
+ left -= offset;
+ }
+
+ /* mark where the next microcode container file starts */
+ offset = data - (u8 *)ucode;
+ *uoffset += offset;
+ *usize -= offset;
+ ucode = data;
+ }
+
+ if (!eq_id) {
+ *usize = 0;
return;
+ }
/* find ucode and update if needed */
- rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, dummy);
+ rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, eax);
while (left > 0) {
struct microcode_amd *mc;
@@ -132,15 +170,21 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
mc = (struct microcode_amd *)(data + SECTION_HDR_SIZE);
if (eq_id == mc->hdr.processor_rev_id && rev < mc->hdr.patch_id)
if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc) == 0) {
- if (!(*new_rev))
- *new_rev = mc->hdr.patch_id;
- break;
+ rev = mc->hdr.patch_id;
+ *new_rev = rev;
}
offset = header[1] + SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
data += offset;
left -= offset;
}
+
+ /* mark where this microcode container file ends */
+ offset = *usize - (data - (u8 *)ucode);
+ *usize -= offset;
+
+ if (!(*new_rev))
+ *usize = 0;
}
void __init load_ucode_amd_bsp(void)
--
1.7.9.5
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:22:18PM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> This patchset addreses two problems with early loading on AMD.
>
> First, feedback from Yinghai that find_ucode_in_initrd() should be
> marked __init:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/4/695
>
> And second, feedback from Henrique that Intel early loading supports
> multiple microcode firmware concatenated together, whereas the current
> AMD implementation lacks this support:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/31/4
>
> V3:
> * style fix -- reduce multiple if statements into a single one
Hi hpa or Yinghai, just wondering if you had the chance to look at this
V3 yet.
Thank you,
* Jacob Shin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:22:18PM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> > This patchset addreses two problems with early loading on AMD.
> >
> > First, feedback from Yinghai that find_ucode_in_initrd() should be
> > marked __init:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/4/695
> >
> > And second, feedback from Henrique that Intel early loading supports
> > multiple microcode firmware concatenated together, whereas the current
> > AMD implementation lacks this support:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/31/4
> >
> > V3:
> > * style fix -- reduce multiple if statements into a single one
>
> Hi hpa or Yinghai, just wondering if you had the chance to look at this
> V3 yet.
It appears Peter applied v2 to tip:x86/microcode two days before you sent
v3 - please send any changes in v3 as delta patches.
Thanks,
Ingo
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:30:53PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jacob Shin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:22:18PM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> > > This patchset addreses two problems with early loading on AMD.
> > >
> > > First, feedback from Yinghai that find_ucode_in_initrd() should be
> > > marked __init:
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/4/695
> > >
> > > And second, feedback from Henrique that Intel early loading supports
> > > multiple microcode firmware concatenated together, whereas the current
> > > AMD implementation lacks this support:
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/31/4
> > >
> > > V3:
> > > * style fix -- reduce multiple if statements into a single one
> >
> > Hi hpa or Yinghai, just wondering if you had the chance to look at this
> > V3 yet.
>
> It appears Peter applied v2 to tip:x86/microcode two days before you sent
> v3 - please send any changes in v3 as delta patches.
I actually recieved the tip-bot email <https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/12/468>
couple of days after sending out the above message, so I assumed that
V3 was committed in.
I should have read the tip-bot message thoroughly and noticed
it. Sorry about that. Here is the delta patch:
---8<---
>From 1445587da716b306f39feef46fb7150f292060c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:52:50 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] x86, microcode, amd: another early loading fixup
commit cd1c32ca969ebfd65e61312c988223bb14f09c2e is an early premature
rendition of the patch. Augment it with this delta patch to:
* correctly mark offset and size of the matching bin file
* use __pa instead of __pa_nodebug during AP load
* check for !initrd_start before using it
---
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
index 4c593c2..1ac6e9a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
@@ -143,13 +143,17 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
left -= offset;
}
- offset = data - (u8 *)ucode;
+ /* mark where the next microcode container file starts */
+ offset = data - (u8 *)ucode;
*uoffset += offset;
*usize -= offset;
+ ucode = data;
}
- if (!eq_id)
+ if (!eq_id) {
+ *usize = 0;
return;
+ }
/* find ucode and update if needed */
@@ -166,15 +170,21 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
mc = (struct microcode_amd *)(data + SECTION_HDR_SIZE);
if (eq_id == mc->hdr.processor_rev_id && rev < mc->hdr.patch_id)
if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc) == 0) {
- if (!(*new_rev))
- *new_rev = mc->hdr.patch_id;
- break;
+ rev = mc->hdr.patch_id;
+ *new_rev = rev;
}
offset = header[1] + SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
data += offset;
left -= offset;
}
+
+ /* mark where this microcode container file ends */
+ offset = *usize - (data - (u8 *)ucode);
+ *usize -= offset;
+
+ if (!(*new_rev))
+ *usize = 0;
}
void __init load_ucode_amd_bsp(void)
@@ -204,19 +214,20 @@ void __cpuinit load_ucode_amd_ap(void)
size_t *usize;
void *ucode;
- mc = (struct microcode_amd *)__pa_nodebug(amd_bsp_mpb);
+ mc = (struct microcode_amd *)__pa(amd_bsp_mpb);
if (mc->hdr.patch_id && mc->hdr.processor_rev_id) {
__apply_microcode_amd(mc);
return;
}
- initrd = (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&initrd_start);
- uoffset = (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_offset);
- usize = (size_t *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_size);
- if (!*usize)
+ initrd = (unsigned long *)__pa(&initrd_start);
+ uoffset = (unsigned long *)__pa(&ucode_offset);
+ usize = (size_t *)__pa(&ucode_size);
+
+ if (!*usize || !*initrd)
return;
- ucode = (void *)((unsigned long)__pa_nodebug(*initrd) + *uoffset);
+ ucode = (void *)((unsigned long)__pa(*initrd) + *uoffset);
apply_ucode_in_initrd(ucode, *usize);
}
@@ -250,7 +261,7 @@ void __cpuinit load_ucode_amd_ap(void)
if (cpu && !ucode_loaded) {
void *ucode;
- if (!ucode_size)
+ if (!ucode_size || !initrd_start)
return;
ucode = (void *)(initrd_start + ucode_offset);
@@ -278,10 +289,7 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(void)
pr_info("microcode: updated early to new patch_level=0x%08x\n",
ucode_new_rev);
- if (ucode_loaded)
- return 0;
-
- if (!ucode_size)
+ if (ucode_loaded || !ucode_size || !initrd_start)
return 0;
ucode = (void *)(initrd_start + ucode_offset);
--
1.7.9.5
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:16:16AM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:30:53PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Jacob Shin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:22:18PM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> > > > This patchset addreses two problems with early loading on AMD.
> > > >
> > > > First, feedback from Yinghai that find_ucode_in_initrd() should be
> > > > marked __init:
> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/4/695
> > > >
> > > > And second, feedback from Henrique that Intel early loading supports
> > > > multiple microcode firmware concatenated together, whereas the current
> > > > AMD implementation lacks this support:
> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/31/4
> > > >
> > > > V3:
> > > > * style fix -- reduce multiple if statements into a single one
> > >
> > > Hi hpa or Yinghai, just wondering if you had the chance to look at this
> > > V3 yet.
> >
> > It appears Peter applied v2 to tip:x86/microcode two days before you sent
> > v3 - please send any changes in v3 as delta patches.
>
> I actually recieved the tip-bot email <https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/12/468>
> couple of days after sending out the above message, so I assumed that
> V3 was committed in.
>
> I should have read the tip-bot message thoroughly and noticed
> it. Sorry about that. Here is the delta patch:
Sigh :-( .. sorry, forgot to sign off. Here it is again:
---8<---
>From 1445587da716b306f39feef46fb7150f292060c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:52:50 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] x86, microcode, amd: another early loading fixup
commit cd1c32ca969ebfd65e61312c988223bb14f09c2e is an early premature
rendition of the patch. Augment it with this delta patch to:
* correctly mark offset and size of the matching bin file
* use __pa instead of __pa_nodebug during AP load
* check for !initrd_start before using it
Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
index 4c593c2..1ac6e9a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
@@ -143,13 +143,17 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
left -= offset;
}
- offset = data - (u8 *)ucode;
+ /* mark where the next microcode container file starts */
+ offset = data - (u8 *)ucode;
*uoffset += offset;
*usize -= offset;
+ ucode = data;
}
- if (!eq_id)
+ if (!eq_id) {
+ *usize = 0;
return;
+ }
/* find ucode and update if needed */
@@ -166,15 +170,21 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
mc = (struct microcode_amd *)(data + SECTION_HDR_SIZE);
if (eq_id == mc->hdr.processor_rev_id && rev < mc->hdr.patch_id)
if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc) == 0) {
- if (!(*new_rev))
- *new_rev = mc->hdr.patch_id;
- break;
+ rev = mc->hdr.patch_id;
+ *new_rev = rev;
}
offset = header[1] + SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
data += offset;
left -= offset;
}
+
+ /* mark where this microcode container file ends */
+ offset = *usize - (data - (u8 *)ucode);
+ *usize -= offset;
+
+ if (!(*new_rev))
+ *usize = 0;
}
void __init load_ucode_amd_bsp(void)
@@ -204,19 +214,20 @@ void __cpuinit load_ucode_amd_ap(void)
size_t *usize;
void *ucode;
- mc = (struct microcode_amd *)__pa_nodebug(amd_bsp_mpb);
+ mc = (struct microcode_amd *)__pa(amd_bsp_mpb);
if (mc->hdr.patch_id && mc->hdr.processor_rev_id) {
__apply_microcode_amd(mc);
return;
}
- initrd = (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&initrd_start);
- uoffset = (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_offset);
- usize = (size_t *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_size);
- if (!*usize)
+ initrd = (unsigned long *)__pa(&initrd_start);
+ uoffset = (unsigned long *)__pa(&ucode_offset);
+ usize = (size_t *)__pa(&ucode_size);
+
+ if (!*usize || !*initrd)
return;
- ucode = (void *)((unsigned long)__pa_nodebug(*initrd) + *uoffset);
+ ucode = (void *)((unsigned long)__pa(*initrd) + *uoffset);
apply_ucode_in_initrd(ucode, *usize);
}
@@ -250,7 +261,7 @@ void __cpuinit load_ucode_amd_ap(void)
if (cpu && !ucode_loaded) {
void *ucode;
- if (!ucode_size)
+ if (!ucode_size || !initrd_start)
return;
ucode = (void *)(initrd_start + ucode_offset);
@@ -278,10 +289,7 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(void)
pr_info("microcode: updated early to new patch_level=0x%08x\n",
ucode_new_rev);
- if (ucode_loaded)
- return 0;
-
- if (!ucode_size)
+ if (ucode_loaded || !ucode_size || !initrd_start)
return 0;
ucode = (void *)(initrd_start + ucode_offset);
--
1.7.9.5
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:24:14AM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:16:16AM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:30:53PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Jacob Shin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:22:18PM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> > > > > This patchset addreses two problems with early loading on AMD.
> > > > >
> > > > > First, feedback from Yinghai that find_ucode_in_initrd() should be
> > > > > marked __init:
> > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/4/695
> > > > >
> > > > > And second, feedback from Henrique that Intel early loading supports
> > > > > multiple microcode firmware concatenated together, whereas the current
> > > > > AMD implementation lacks this support:
> > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/31/4
> > > > >
> > > > > V3:
> > > > > * style fix -- reduce multiple if statements into a single one
> > > >
> > > > Hi hpa or Yinghai, just wondering if you had the chance to look at this
> > > > V3 yet.
> > >
> > > It appears Peter applied v2 to tip:x86/microcode two days before you sent
> > > v3 - please send any changes in v3 as delta patches.
> >
> > I actually recieved the tip-bot email <https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/12/468>
> > couple of days after sending out the above message, so I assumed that
> > V3 was committed in.
> >
> > I should have read the tip-bot message thoroughly and noticed
> > it. Sorry about that. Here is the delta patch:
>
> Sigh :-( .. sorry, forgot to sign off. Here it is again:
>
> ---8<---
>
> From 1445587da716b306f39feef46fb7150f292060c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:52:50 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, microcode, amd: another early loading fixup
>
> commit cd1c32ca969ebfd65e61312c988223bb14f09c2e is an early premature
> rendition of the patch. Augment it with this delta patch to:
> * correctly mark offset and size of the matching bin file
> * use __pa instead of __pa_nodebug during AP load
> * check for !initrd_start before using it
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
Hi hpa, checking back to see if you had the chance to look at this
delta patch. It is needed to properly support concatenated microcode
binaries on AMD early load. (Intel already supports this).
Thank you,
Commit-ID: 9608d33b8210c993af4430d661a6474946480c9b
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/9608d33b8210c993af4430d661a6474946480c9b
Author: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:52:50 -0500
Committer: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:55:37 -0700
x86, microcode, amd: Another early loading fixup
commit cd1c32ca969ebfd65e61312c988223bb14f09c2e is an early premature
rendition of the patch. Augment it with this delta patch to:
* correctly mark offset and size of the matching bin file
* use __pa instead of __pa_nodebug during AP load
* check for !initrd_start before using it
Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620152414.GA6676@jshin-Toonie
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
index 4c593c2..1ac6e9a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd_early.c
@@ -143,13 +143,17 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
left -= offset;
}
- offset = data - (u8 *)ucode;
+ /* mark where the next microcode container file starts */
+ offset = data - (u8 *)ucode;
*uoffset += offset;
*usize -= offset;
+ ucode = data;
}
- if (!eq_id)
+ if (!eq_id) {
+ *usize = 0;
return;
+ }
/* find ucode and update if needed */
@@ -166,15 +170,21 @@ static void __cpuinit apply_ucode_in_initrd(void *ucode, size_t size)
mc = (struct microcode_amd *)(data + SECTION_HDR_SIZE);
if (eq_id == mc->hdr.processor_rev_id && rev < mc->hdr.patch_id)
if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc) == 0) {
- if (!(*new_rev))
- *new_rev = mc->hdr.patch_id;
- break;
+ rev = mc->hdr.patch_id;
+ *new_rev = rev;
}
offset = header[1] + SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
data += offset;
left -= offset;
}
+
+ /* mark where this microcode container file ends */
+ offset = *usize - (data - (u8 *)ucode);
+ *usize -= offset;
+
+ if (!(*new_rev))
+ *usize = 0;
}
void __init load_ucode_amd_bsp(void)
@@ -204,19 +214,20 @@ void __cpuinit load_ucode_amd_ap(void)
size_t *usize;
void *ucode;
- mc = (struct microcode_amd *)__pa_nodebug(amd_bsp_mpb);
+ mc = (struct microcode_amd *)__pa(amd_bsp_mpb);
if (mc->hdr.patch_id && mc->hdr.processor_rev_id) {
__apply_microcode_amd(mc);
return;
}
- initrd = (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&initrd_start);
- uoffset = (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_offset);
- usize = (size_t *)__pa_nodebug(&ucode_size);
- if (!*usize)
+ initrd = (unsigned long *)__pa(&initrd_start);
+ uoffset = (unsigned long *)__pa(&ucode_offset);
+ usize = (size_t *)__pa(&ucode_size);
+
+ if (!*usize || !*initrd)
return;
- ucode = (void *)((unsigned long)__pa_nodebug(*initrd) + *uoffset);
+ ucode = (void *)((unsigned long)__pa(*initrd) + *uoffset);
apply_ucode_in_initrd(ucode, *usize);
}
@@ -250,7 +261,7 @@ void __cpuinit load_ucode_amd_ap(void)
if (cpu && !ucode_loaded) {
void *ucode;
- if (!ucode_size)
+ if (!ucode_size || !initrd_start)
return;
ucode = (void *)(initrd_start + ucode_offset);
@@ -278,10 +289,7 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(void)
pr_info("microcode: updated early to new patch_level=0x%08x\n",
ucode_new_rev);
- if (ucode_loaded)
- return 0;
-
- if (!ucode_size)
+ if (ucode_loaded || !ucode_size || !initrd_start)
return 0;
ucode = (void *)(initrd_start + ucode_offset);