Impact: reduce kernel size a bit, address sparse warning
Addresses the problem pointed out by this sparse warning:
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:53:20: warning: symbol 'swiotlb_dma_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
For x86: swiotlb_dma_ops can be static, because it's not used outside pci-swiotlb.c
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
index 887388a..a1712f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(hwdev, size, dma_handle, flags);
}
-struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
+static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
.mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
.alloc_coherent = x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
.free_coherent = swiotlb_free_coherent,
--
1.6.0.6
Commit-ID: 49cc21f93ddc4c17c2be77d9da43a2db69acc0d3
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/49cc21f93ddc4c17c2be77d9da43a2db69acc0d3
Author: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:24:21 +0530
Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:35:11 +0200
x86: pci-swiotlb.c swiotlb_dma_ops should be static
Impact: reduce kernel size a bit, address sparse warning
Addresses the problem pointed out by this sparse warning:
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:53:20: warning: symbol 'swiotlb_dma_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
For x86: swiotlb_dma_ops can be static, because it's not used outside
of pci-swiotlb.c
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <[email protected]>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>
LKML-Reference: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
index 34f12e9..221a385 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(hwdev, size, dma_handle, flags);
}
-struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
+static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
.mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
.alloc_coherent = x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
.free_coherent = swiotlb_free_coherent,
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:12:52 GMT
tip-bot for Jaswinder Singh Rajput <[email protected]> wrote:
> Commit-ID: 49cc21f93ddc4c17c2be77d9da43a2db69acc0d3
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/49cc21f93ddc4c17c2be77d9da43a2db69acc0d3
> Author: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <[email protected]>
> AuthorDate: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:24:21 +0530
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> CommitDate: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:35:11 +0200
>
> x86: pci-swiotlb.c swiotlb_dma_ops should be static
>
> Impact: reduce kernel size a bit, address sparse warning
>
> Addresses the problem pointed out by this sparse warning:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:53:20: warning: symbol 'swiotlb_dma_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> For x86: swiotlb_dma_ops can be static, because it's not used outside
> of pci-swiotlb.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <[email protected]>
> Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>
> LKML-Reference: <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>
Well, this patch is fine for now. But all the users of swiotlb uses
struct dma_map_ops now so I plan to remove the arch's dma_map_ops
swiotlb_dma_ops.
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> index 34f12e9..221a385 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
> return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(hwdev, size, dma_handle, flags);
> }
>
> -struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> +static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> .mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
> .alloc_coherent = x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
> .free_coherent = swiotlb_free_coherent,
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Commit-ID: ff6c6fed3a8ab9b0a7b02574e095e905e89421d9
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ff6c6fed3a8ab9b0a7b02574e095e905e89421d9
Author: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:24:21 +0530
Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:51:04 +0200
x86: pci-swiotlb.c swiotlb_dma_ops should be static
Impact: reduce kernel size a bit, address sparse warning
Addresses the problem pointed out by this sparse warning:
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:53:20: warning: symbol 'swiotlb_dma_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
For x86: swiotlb_dma_ops can be static, because it's not used outside
of pci-swiotlb.c
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <[email protected]>
Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>
LKML-Reference: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
index 34f12e9..221a385 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(hwdev, size, dma_handle, flags);
}
-struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
+static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
.mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
.alloc_coherent = x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
.free_coherent = swiotlb_free_coherent,