2003-07-30 12:45:20

by Larry McVoy

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: BK2CVS up to date

There was a pause in the updating of the 2.5 CVS tree exported from the
2.5 BK tree; it was related to the move to the new colo. The trees are
up to date now and I suspect that Ben's BK2SVN mirror will be updated
soon as well.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm


2003-07-30 12:57:09

by Jan-Benedict Glaw

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: BK2CVS up to date

On Wed, 2003-07-30 05:45:15 -0700, Larry McVoy <[email protected]>
wrote in message <[email protected]>:
> There was a pause in the updating of the 2.5 CVS tree exported from the
> 2.5 BK tree; it was related to the move to the new colo. The trees are
> up to date now and I suspect that Ben's BK2SVN mirror will be updated
> soon as well.

Fine, thanks.

MfG, JBG

--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier B?rger" | im Internet! | im Irak!
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(IRAQ_WAR_2 | DRM | TCPA));


Attachments:
(No filename) (686.00 B)
(No filename) (189.00 B)
Download all attachments

2003-07-30 13:24:48

by MånsRullgård

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: BK2CVS up to date

Larry McVoy <[email protected]> writes:

> There was a pause in the updating of the 2.5 CVS tree exported from the
> 2.5 BK tree; it was related to the move to the new colo. The trees are
> up to date now and I suspect that Ben's BK2SVN mirror will be updated
> soon as well.

That reminds me that (last time I checked (last week)) the CVS tag for
2.4.21 was missing. There's only a tag for 2.4.21-pre8, which is
equal to 2.4.21, but, IMHO, the final version should have a tag.

--
M?ns Rullg?rd
[email protected]

2003-07-30 14:17:25

by Larry McVoy

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: BK2CVS up to date

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:16:57PM +0200, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Larry McVoy <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > There was a pause in the updating of the 2.5 CVS tree exported from the
> > 2.5 BK tree; it was related to the move to the new colo. The trees are
> > up to date now and I suspect that Ben's BK2SVN mirror will be updated
> > soon as well.
>
> That reminds me that (last time I checked (last week)) the CVS tag for
> 2.4.21 was missing. There's only a tag for 2.4.21-pre8, which is
> equal to 2.4.21, but, IMHO, the final version should have a tag.

$ rlog ChangeSet,v | more

RCS file: ChangeSet,v
Working file: ChangeSet
head: 1.3660
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
v2_4_22-pre8: 1.3645
v2_4_22-pre7: 1.3621
v2_4_22-pre6: 1.3577
v2_4_22-pre5: 1.3538
v2_4_22-pre1: 1.3211
v2_4_21: 1.3190
...
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm

2003-07-30 15:42:59

by MånsRullgård

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: BK2CVS up to date

Larry McVoy <[email protected]> writes:

> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:16:57PM +0200, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> Larry McVoy <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > There was a pause in the updating of the 2.5 CVS tree exported from the
>> > 2.5 BK tree; it was related to the move to the new colo. The trees are
>> > up to date now and I suspect that Ben's BK2SVN mirror will be updated
>> > soon as well.
>>
>> That reminds me that (last time I checked (last week)) the CVS tag for
>> 2.4.21 was missing. There's only a tag for 2.4.21-pre8, which is
>> equal to 2.4.21, but, IMHO, the final version should have a tag.
>
> $ rlog ChangeSet,v | more
>
> v2_4_21: 1.3190

Well, it seem to be there now. My apologies for contributing to the
too-high noise on this list before checking facts.

--
M?ns Rullg?rd
[email protected]