On a kernel 2.6.0-test9 as an NFS client I am having trouble transferring
data to and from NFS servers. It it extraordinarily slow.??I?receive?the
following information in dmesg:
nfs warning: mount version older than kernel
nfs: server safe not responding, still trying
nfs: server safe not responding, still trying
nfs: server safe not responding, still trying
nfs: server safe not responding, still trying
I have also upgraded util-linux to 2.12pre
I am using various NFS servers, Solaris 2.8, Solaris 2.6, linux 2.4 and of
all things a windows server with NFS. It seems to suffer when connecting to
any one of them.
I have built from the default 2.6.0-test9 source.
Luke Driscoll <[email protected]> writes:
> On a kernel 2.6.0-test9 as an NFS client I am having trouble transferring
> data to and from NFS servers. It it extraordinarily slow.??I?receive?the
> following information in dmesg:
>
> nfs warning: mount version older than kernel
I see that one, too. Apart from that, it appears to work. Try the
tcp option, and see if it helps.
--
M?ns Rullg?rd
[email protected]
M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Luke Driscoll <[email protected]> writes:
>
>
>>On a kernel 2.6.0-test9 as an NFS client I am having trouble transferring
>>data to and from NFS servers. It it extraordinarily slow. I receive the
>>following information in dmesg:
>>
>>nfs warning: mount version older than kernel
>
>
> I see that one, too. Apart from that, it appears to work. Try the
> tcp option, and see if it helps.
>
tcp option seems to have helped, except when attempting to mount a
redhat 9 nfs server. Mount says:
"nfs server reported service unavailable: Address already in use"
Luke Driscoll <[email protected]> writes:
>>>On a kernel 2.6.0-test9 as an NFS client I am having trouble transferring
>>>data to and from NFS servers. It it extraordinarily slow. I receive the
>>>following information in dmesg:
>>>
>>>nfs warning: mount version older than kernel
>> I see that one, too. Apart from that, it appears to work. Try the
>> tcp option, and see if it helps.
>>
> tcp option seems to have helped, except when attempting to mount a
> redhat 9 nfs server. Mount says:
> "nfs server reported service unavailable: Address already in use"
Maybe the NFS server in RH9 doesn't support TCP mounts. I just spent
the better part of the afternoon fighting with almost every other
aspect of an RH9 system, so nothing surprises me when it comes to
redhat. They even ship a broken perl.
--
M?ns Rullg?rd
[email protected]