2003-08-16 10:56:24

by Behdad Esfahbod

Subject: devfs oops on module missing

Hi,

With 2.6.0-test3 and 2.6.0-test2, devfs mounting at boot time,
devfsd 1.3.25 installed, no floppy drive, so floppy,ko would
reject to load. On boot time got this:

modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting floppy
(/lib/modules/2.6.0-test3/kernel/drivers/block/floppy.ko): No such device

devfs_put(f7498780): poisoned pointer
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/devfs/base.c:922!
invalid operand: 0000 [#1]
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<c01a2c68>]
EFLAGS: 00010286
EIP is at devfs_put+0xf8/0x105
eax: 0000000d ebx: f7498780 ecx: c033c430 edx: 00000286
esi: c03420c0 edi: f7498780 ebp: 00000000 esp: f78fbec8
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process devfsd (pid: 18, thredinfo=f78fa000 task=f79d0c80)
Stack: c02fbac4 c02e6ece f7498780 00000000 c01a5772 f7498780 f7d0f41f 00000001
f7d0f000 f791d4c8 00000082 f78fa000 c03420e8 f78b0800 f7498780 00000021
00000000 00000021 00000000 000003ff 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000
Call Trace:
[<c01a5772>] devfsd_read+0x31f/0x4c4
[<c011f68c>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
[<c011f68c>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
[<c0158ebe>] vfs_read+0xbc/0x127
[<c011f434>] schedule+0x1b6/ox3be
[<c0159149>] sus_read+0x42/0x63
[<c01091b9>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71

Code: 0f 0b 9a 03 d2 ba 2f c0 e9 1b ff ff ff 55 57 56 53 83 ec 10



Removing the floppy.ko, well, solved this problem.

2003-08-16 11:21:17

by Jeff Garzik

Subject: Re: devfs oops on module missing

Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With 2.6.0-test3 and 2.6.0-test2, devfs mounting at boot time,
> devfsd 1.3.25 installed, no floppy drive, so floppy,ko would
> reject to load. On boot time got this:
>
> modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting floppy
> (/lib/modules/2.6.0-test3/kernel/drivers/block/floppy.ko): No such device
>
> devfs_put(f7498780): poisoned pointer


hmm, isn't it time we deprecated devfs?

Jeff

2003-08-16 11:29:32

by Christoph Hellwig

Subject: Re: devfs oops on module missing

On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 07:21:02AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> hmm, isn't it time we deprecated devfs?

Well, it is long overdue, but what's the relation to this oops?
Even if we deprecate devfs now we'll have to keep it around for
two stable series or so until all users switch away.

But fortunately I think this bug is already fixed in current BK.