Hello,
This patchset adds Oxalis board support. This board is one of the
96Boards Enterprise Edition platform from EBS-SYSTART GmbH. Below are some
of the key features of this board:
* SoC: NXP Layerscape LS1012A
* RAM: 1GB DDR3L
* PMU: NXP VR5100
* Storage: 64MByte SPI Flash for bootloader and RCW, MicroSD Card, SATA
* Connectivity: 2x Ethernet
* USB: 2x USB3.0
More information about this board can be found in 96Boards product
page: https://www.96boards.org/product/oxalis/
Ethernet and SPI flash are not supported yet!
Thanks,
Mani
Changes in v2:
As per Rob's review:
* Adopted the Oxalis board binding to JSON format.
* Sorted the EBS-SYSTART vendor prefix alphabetically.
* Used the generic node name for audio codec.
Manivannan Sadhasivam (3):
dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add EBS-SYSTART GmbH Vendor Prefix
dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add devicetree binding for Oxalis
arm64: dts: freescale: Add devicetree for Oxalis
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 +-
.../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile | 1 +
.../boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-oxalis.dts | 96 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-oxalis.dts
--
2.17.1
Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While adding
that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also.
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
@@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties:
- fsl,vf610
- fsl,vf610m4
- - description: LS1021A based Boards
+ - description: LS1012A based Boards
items:
- enum:
- fsl,ls1012a-rdb
- fsl,ls1012a-frdm
- fsl,ls1012a-qds
+ - ebs-systart,oxalis
- const: fsl,ls1021a
- description: LS1043A based Boards
--
2.17.1
Add devicetree support for Oxalis SoM board from EBS-SYSTART. This
board is one of the 96Boards Enterprise Edition platform. Below are some
of the key features of this board:
* SoC: NXP Layerscape LS1012A
* RAM: 1GB DDR3L
* PMU: NXP VR5100
* Storage: 64MByte SPI Flash for bootloader and RCW, MicroSD Card, SATA
* Connectivity: 2x Ethernet
* USB: 2x USB3.0
More information about this board can be found in 96Boards product
page: https://www.96boards.org/product/oxalis/
Ethernet and SPI flash are not supported yet!
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile | 1 +
.../boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-oxalis.dts | 96 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-oxalis.dts
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile
index f9be2426f83c..d8152cc06b3f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1012a-frwy.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1012a-oxalis.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1012a-qds.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) += fsl-ls1028a-qds.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-oxalis.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-oxalis.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7c726267ec8f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-oxalis.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+/*
+ * Device Tree file for Oxalis
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Manivannan Sadhasivam
+ *
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+
+#include "fsl-ls1012a.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Oxalis";
+ compatible = "ebs-systart,oxalis", "fsl,ls1012a";
+
+ sys_mclk: clock-mclk {
+ compatible = "fixed-clock";
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ clock-frequency = <25000000>;
+ };
+
+ reg_1p8v: regulator-1p8v {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "1P8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ };
+
+ sound {
+ compatible = "simple-audio-card";
+ simple-audio-card,format = "i2s";
+ simple-audio-card,widgets =
+ "Microphone", "Microphone Jack",
+ "Headphone", "Headphone Jack",
+ "Speaker", "Speaker Ext",
+ "Line", "Line In Jack";
+ simple-audio-card,routing =
+ "MIC_IN", "Microphone Jack",
+ "Microphone Jack", "Mic Bias",
+ "LINE_IN", "Line In Jack",
+ "Headphone Jack", "HP_OUT",
+ "Speaker Ext", "LINE_OUT";
+
+ simple-audio-card,cpu {
+ sound-dai = <&sai2>;
+ frame-master;
+ bitclock-master;
+ };
+
+ simple-audio-card,codec {
+ sound-dai = <&codec>;
+ frame-master;
+ bitclock-master;
+ system-clock-frequency = <25000000>;
+ };
+ };
+};
+
+&duart0 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&duart1 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&esdhc1 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&i2c0 {
+ status = "okay";
+
+ codec: audio-codec@a {
+ #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "fsl,sgtl5000";
+ reg = <0xa>;
+ VDDA-supply = <®_1p8v>;
+ VDDIO-supply = <®_1p8v>;
+ clocks = <&sys_mclk>;
+ };
+};
+
+&i2c1 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&sai2 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&sata {
+ status = "okay";
+};
--
2.17.1
Add vendor prefix for EBS-SYSTART GmbH.
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
index 389508584f48..38693105b5c6 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ dongwoon Dongwoon Anatech
dptechnics DPTechnics
dragino Dragino Technology Co., Limited
ea Embedded Artists AB
+ebs-systart EBS-SYSTART GmbH
ebv EBV Elektronik
eckelmann Eckelmann AG
edt Emerging Display Technologies
--
2.17.1
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:21 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While adding
> that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> @@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties:
> - fsl,vf610
> - fsl,vf610m4
>
> - - description: LS1021A based Boards
> + - description: LS1012A based Boards
Well, yes that was wrong...
> items:
> - enum:
> - fsl,ls1012a-rdb
> - fsl,ls1012a-frdm
> - fsl,ls1012a-qds
> + - ebs-systart,oxalis
Sort alphabetically.
> - const: fsl,ls1021a
And this is wrong too.
I you just change it, then we will be missing an entry for LS1021A.
What's the status of that SoC because there is no board dts file? We
should not have .dtsi files in the kernel which don't get built.
Rob
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:02:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:21 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While adding
> > that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > @@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties:
> > - fsl,vf610
> > - fsl,vf610m4
> >
> > - - description: LS1021A based Boards
> > + - description: LS1012A based Boards
>
> Well, yes that was wrong...
>
> > items:
> > - enum:
> > - fsl,ls1012a-rdb
> > - fsl,ls1012a-frdm
> > - fsl,ls1012a-qds
> > + - ebs-systart,oxalis
>
> Sort alphabetically.
>
Okay.
> > - const: fsl,ls1021a
>
> And this is wrong too.
>
Ah, I missed this ;-)
> I you just change it, then we will be missing an entry for LS1021A.
> What's the status of that SoC because there is no board dts file? We
> should not have .dtsi files in the kernel which don't get built.
>
I don't know much about LS1021A. Shawn should have an idea!
Thanks,
Mani
> Rob
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:02:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:21 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While adding
> > that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > @@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties:
> > - fsl,vf610
> > - fsl,vf610m4
> >
> > - - description: LS1021A based Boards
> > + - description: LS1012A based Boards
>
> Well, yes that was wrong...
>
> > items:
> > - enum:
> > - fsl,ls1012a-rdb
> > - fsl,ls1012a-frdm
> > - fsl,ls1012a-qds
> > + - ebs-systart,oxalis
>
> Sort alphabetically.
>
> > - const: fsl,ls1021a
>
> And this is wrong too.
>
> I you just change it, then we will be missing an entry for LS1021A.
> What's the status of that SoC because there is no board dts file? We
> should not have .dtsi files in the kernel which don't get built.
Hmm, I do not see any LS1021A SoC .dtsi in the tree. I suspect it's
just a typo of LS1012A.
@Leo, do we have a LS1021A SoC?
Shawn
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:07:12PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:21 PM Shawn Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:02:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:21 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While adding
> > > > that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > @@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties:
> > > > - fsl,vf610
> > > > - fsl,vf610m4
> > > >
> > > > - - description: LS1021A based Boards
> > > > + - description: LS1012A based Boards
> > >
> > > Well, yes that was wrong...
> > >
> > > > items:
> > > > - enum:
> > > > - fsl,ls1012a-rdb
> > > > - fsl,ls1012a-frdm
> > > > - fsl,ls1012a-qds
> > > > + - ebs-systart,oxalis
> > >
> > > Sort alphabetically.
> > >
> > > > - const: fsl,ls1021a
> > >
> > > And this is wrong too.
> > >
> > > I you just change it, then we will be missing an entry for LS1021A.
> > > What's the status of that SoC because there is no board dts file? We
> > > should not have .dtsi files in the kernel which don't get built.
> >
> > Hmm, I do not see any LS1021A SoC .dtsi in the tree. I suspect it's
> > just a typo of LS1012A.
> >
> > @Leo, do we have a LS1021A SoC?
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
Oops, I only searched arm64 folder.
So it seems the compatible of the boards below are missing there.
ls1021a-moxa-uc-8410a.dts
ls1021a-qds.dts
ls1021a-twr.dts
Shawn
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:50:51 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Add vendor prefix for EBS-SYSTART GmbH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:21 PM Shawn Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:02:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:21 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While adding
> > > that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > @@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties:
> > > - fsl,vf610
> > > - fsl,vf610m4
> > >
> > > - - description: LS1021A based Boards
> > > + - description: LS1012A based Boards
> >
> > Well, yes that was wrong...
> >
> > > items:
> > > - enum:
> > > - fsl,ls1012a-rdb
> > > - fsl,ls1012a-frdm
> > > - fsl,ls1012a-qds
> > > + - ebs-systart,oxalis
> >
> > Sort alphabetically.
> >
> > > - const: fsl,ls1021a
> >
> > And this is wrong too.
> >
> > I you just change it, then we will be missing an entry for LS1021A.
> > What's the status of that SoC because there is no board dts file? We
> > should not have .dtsi files in the kernel which don't get built.
>
> Hmm, I do not see any LS1021A SoC .dtsi in the tree. I suspect it's
> just a typo of LS1012A.
>
> @Leo, do we have a LS1021A SoC?
arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
Rob
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:14:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:07:12PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:21 PM Shawn Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:02:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:21 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While adding
> > > > > that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > @@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties:
> > > > > - fsl,vf610
> > > > > - fsl,vf610m4
> > > > >
> > > > > - - description: LS1021A based Boards
> > > > > + - description: LS1012A based Boards
> > > >
> > > > Well, yes that was wrong...
> > > >
> > > > > items:
> > > > > - enum:
> > > > > - fsl,ls1012a-rdb
> > > > > - fsl,ls1012a-frdm
> > > > > - fsl,ls1012a-qds
> > > > > + - ebs-systart,oxalis
> > > >
> > > > Sort alphabetically.
> > > >
> > > > > - const: fsl,ls1021a
> > > >
> > > > And this is wrong too.
> > > >
> > > > I you just change it, then we will be missing an entry for LS1021A.
> > > > What's the status of that SoC because there is no board dts file? We
> > > > should not have .dtsi files in the kernel which don't get built.
> > >
> > > Hmm, I do not see any LS1021A SoC .dtsi in the tree. I suspect it's
> > > just a typo of LS1012A.
> > >
> > > @Leo, do we have a LS1021A SoC?
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
>
> Oops, I only searched arm64 folder.
>
> So it seems the compatible of the boards below are missing there.
>
> ls1021a-moxa-uc-8410a.dts
> ls1021a-qds.dts
> ls1021a-twr.dts
So how should we proceed here? The above mentioned boards are lacking
compatible in dts files and I guess that's the reason they didn't get
mentioned in "fsl" binding file.
Should I just go ahead and add the compatibles for these boards and list
them in binding file?
Thanks,
Mani
>
> Shawn
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 12:10 AM
> To: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> Cc: Leo Li <[email protected]>; moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC
> ARM ARCHITECTURE <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Amit Kucheria
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add devicetree binding for
> Oxalis
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:14:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:07:12PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:21 PM Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:02:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:21 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While
> > > > > > adding that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++-
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644
> > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > > @@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties:
> > > > > > - fsl,vf610
> > > > > > - fsl,vf610m4
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - - description: LS1021A based Boards
> > > > > > + - description: LS1012A based Boards
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, yes that was wrong...
> > > > >
> > > > > > items:
> > > > > > - enum:
> > > > > > - fsl,ls1012a-rdb
> > > > > > - fsl,ls1012a-frdm
> > > > > > - fsl,ls1012a-qds
> > > > > > + - ebs-systart,oxalis
> > > > >
> > > > > Sort alphabetically.
> > > > >
> > > > > > - const: fsl,ls1021a
> > > > >
> > > > > And this is wrong too.
> > > > >
> > > > > I you just change it, then we will be missing an entry for LS1021A.
> > > > > What's the status of that SoC because there is no board dts
> > > > > file? We should not have .dtsi files in the kernel which don't get built.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, I do not see any LS1021A SoC .dtsi in the tree. I suspect
> > > > it's just a typo of LS1012A.
> > > >
> > > > @Leo, do we have a LS1021A SoC?
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
> >
> > Oops, I only searched arm64 folder.
> >
> > So it seems the compatible of the boards below are missing there.
> >
> > ls1021a-moxa-uc-8410a.dts
> > ls1021a-qds.dts
> > ls1021a-twr.dts
>
> So how should we proceed here? The above mentioned boards are lacking
> compatible in dts files and I guess that's the reason they didn't get
> mentioned in "fsl" binding file.
>
> Should I just go ahead and add the compatibles for these boards and list
> them in binding file?
Please go ahead and do that. One thing is that the moxa-uc-8410a board is a 3rd-party board, not sure if it should belong to the fsl binding file.
Regards,
Leo
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 07:57:20PM +0000, Leo Li wrote:
> > > So it seems the compatible of the boards below are missing there.
> > >
> > > ls1021a-moxa-uc-8410a.dts
> > > ls1021a-qds.dts
> > > ls1021a-twr.dts
> >
> > So how should we proceed here? The above mentioned boards are lacking
> > compatible in dts files and I guess that's the reason they didn't get
> > mentioned in "fsl" binding file.
> >
> > Should I just go ahead and add the compatibles for these boards and list
> > them in binding file?
>
> Please go ahead and do that. One thing is that the moxa-uc-8410a board is a 3rd-party board, not sure if it should belong to the fsl binding file.
The fsl.yaml is designed to contain various boards using fsl SoCs, so
it's fine.
Shawn