On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 08:05:04PM +0100, Matteo Croce wrote:
> Since commit ad67b74d2469d9b8 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p"),
> at boot "____ptrval____" is printed instead of the trampoline addresses:
>
> Base memory trampoline at [(____ptrval____)] 99000 size 24576
>
> Remove the address from the print as we don't want to leak kernel
> addresses.
>
> Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b8 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/realmode/init.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
> index d10105825d57..d76a1380ec37 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
> @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ void __init set_real_mode_mem(phys_addr_t mem, size_t size)
> void *base = __va(mem);
>
> real_mode_header = (struct real_mode_header *) base;
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "Base memory trampoline at [%p] %llx size %zu\n",
> - base, (unsigned long long)mem, size);
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "Base memory trampoline at %llx size %zu\n",
> + (unsigned long long)mem, size);
In case this wasn't clear, please remove the whole printk. And don't
forget to CC lkml on your submissions. CCed now.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:15 PM Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 08:05:04PM +0100, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > Since commit ad67b74d2469d9b8 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p"),
> > at boot "____ptrval____" is printed instead of the trampoline addresses:
> >
> > Base memory trampoline at [(____ptrval____)] 99000 size 24576
> >
> > Remove the address from the print as we don't want to leak kernel
> > addresses.
> >
> > Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b8 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
> > Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/realmode/init.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
> > index d10105825d57..d76a1380ec37 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
> > @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ void __init set_real_mode_mem(phys_addr_t mem, size_t size)
> > void *base = __va(mem);
> >
> > real_mode_header = (struct real_mode_header *) base;
> > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "Base memory trampoline at [%p] %llx size %zu\n",
> > - base, (unsigned long long)mem, size);
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "Base memory trampoline at %llx size %zu\n",
> > + (unsigned long long)mem, size);
>
> In case this wasn't clear, please remove the whole printk. And don't
> forget to CC lkml on your submissions. CCed now.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Got it, sent a v3 with the printk removed.
Anyway, I wonder if we can remove the 'size' argument and/or moving
set_real_mode_mem() into realmode.h to have it inlined.
Or maybe it's not worth it.
Regards,
--
Matteo Croce
per aspera ad upstream
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:36:48PM +0100, Matteo Croce wrote:
> Got it, sent a v3 with the printk removed.
> Anyway, I wonder if we can remove the 'size' argument and/or moving
> set_real_mode_mem() into realmode.h to have it inlined.
> Or maybe it's not worth it.
Sure, why not. Making the code simpler is always a GoodThing(tm). :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.