This driver only appears on IA32 & EM64T boxes.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
--- linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig~ 2005-11-14 19:23:45.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig 2005-11-14 19:24:18.000000000 -0500
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ config EFI_PCDP
config DELL_RBU
tristate "BIOS update support for DELL systems via sysfs"
+ depends on X86
select FW_LOADER
help
Say m if you want to have the option of updating the BIOS for your
Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This driver only appears on IA32 & EM64T boxes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
>
> --- linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig~ 2005-11-14 19:23:45.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig 2005-11-14 19:24:18.000000000 -0500
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ config EFI_PCDP
>
> config DELL_RBU
> tristate "BIOS update support for DELL systems via sysfs"
> + depends on X86
> select FW_LOADER
> help
> Say m if you want to have the option of updating the BIOS for your
Does it not compile on other architectures? If it does, there's an
argument for leaving it there, for compile coverage.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:01:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This driver only appears on IA32 & EM64T boxes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig~ 2005-11-14 19:23:45.000000000 -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig 2005-11-14 19:24:18.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ config EFI_PCDP
> >
> > config DELL_RBU
> > tristate "BIOS update support for DELL systems via sysfs"
> > + depends on X86
> > select FW_LOADER
> > help
> > Say m if you want to have the option of updating the BIOS for your
>
> Does it not compile on other architectures? If it does, there's an
> argument for leaving it there, for compile coverage.
If this were a "only works on non-x86" driver, I'd agree, but
x86 drivers probably get way more coverage than any arch already,
so I don't we really gain much by having this available on
archs that can't run it.
Dave
Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:01:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This driver only appears on IA32 & EM64T boxes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > --- linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig~ 2005-11-14 19:23:45.000000000 -0500
> > > +++ linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig 2005-11-14 19:24:18.000000000 -0500
> > > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ config EFI_PCDP
> > >
> > > config DELL_RBU
> > > tristate "BIOS update support for DELL systems via sysfs"
> > > + depends on X86
> > > select FW_LOADER
> > > help
> > > Say m if you want to have the option of updating the BIOS for your
> >
> > Does it not compile on other architectures? If it does, there's an
> > argument for leaving it there, for compile coverage.
>
> If this were a "only works on non-x86" driver, I'd agree, but
> x86 drivers probably get way more coverage than any arch already,
> so I don't we really gain much by having this available on
> archs that can't run it.
>
Where's the advantage in removing it from non-x86 builds?
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:17:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:01:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This driver only appears on IA32 & EM64T boxes.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > --- linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig~ 2005-11-14 19:23:45.000000000 -0500
> > > > +++ linux-2.6.14/drivers/firmware/Kconfig 2005-11-14 19:24:18.000000000 -0500
> > > > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ config EFI_PCDP
> > > >
> > > > config DELL_RBU
> > > > tristate "BIOS update support for DELL systems via sysfs"
> > > > + depends on X86
> > > > select FW_LOADER
> > > > help
> > > > Say m if you want to have the option of updating the BIOS for your
> > >
> > > Does it not compile on other architectures? If it does, there's an
> > > argument for leaving it there, for compile coverage.
> >
> > If this were a "only works on non-x86" driver, I'd agree, but
> > x86 drivers probably get way more coverage than any arch already,
> > so I don't we really gain much by having this available on
> > archs that can't run it.
>
> Where's the advantage in removing it from non-x86 builds?
One less pointless option showing up in configs.
Just like we don't have countless other arch-specific drivers showing
up under non-native archs. Why is this one different ?
Dave