The platform_get_irq() is possible to fail.
And the returned irq could be error number and will finally cause the
failure of the request_irq().
Consider that platform_get_irq() can now in certain cases return
-EPROBE_DEFER, and the consequences of letting request_irq() effectively
convert that into -EINVAL, even at probe time rather than later on.
So it might be better to check just now.
Fixes: 658d439b2292 ("fjes: Introduce FUJITSU Extended Socket Network Device driver")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
---
Changelog:
v4 -> v5
*Change 1. Using error variable to check.
*Change 2. Correct the word.
*Change 3. Add new commit message.
*Change 4. Refine the commit message to be more reasonable.
---
drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c
index e449d9466122..17f2fd937e4d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c
@@ -1268,7 +1268,12 @@ static int fjes_probe(struct platform_device *plat_dev)
}
hw->hw_res.start = res->start;
hw->hw_res.size = resource_size(res);
- hw->hw_res.irq = platform_get_irq(plat_dev, 0);
+
+ err = platform_get_irq(plat_dev, 0);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto err_free_control_wq;
+ hw->hw_res.irq = err;
+
err = fjes_hw_init(&adapter->hw);
if (err)
goto err_free_control_wq;
--
2.25.1
On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 09:34:45 +0800 Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() is possible to fail.
> And the returned irq could be error number and will finally cause the
> failure of the request_irq().
> Consider that platform_get_irq() can now in certain cases return
> -EPROBE_DEFER, and the consequences of letting request_irq() effectively
> convert that into -EINVAL, even at probe time rather than later on.
> So it might be better to check just now.
>
> Fixes: 658d439b2292 ("fjes: Introduce FUJITSU Extended Socket Network Device driver")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
Please take note of the notifications you're getting. The previous
versions of this and the other two patches you posted shortly after
were already merged into the net tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/commit/?id=db6d6afe382de5a65d6ccf51253ab48b8e8336c3
If you want to refactor the check you need to send an incremental
change (IOW diff against the previously applied patch).